Abstract
It has been argued that behavior on the Internet differs from similar behavior in the “real world” (Joinson, 1998a). In the present study, participants completed measures of self-consciousness, social anxiety, self-esteem, and social desirability, using either the World-Wide Web (WWW) or pen and paper, and were assigned to either an anonymous or a nonanonymous condition. It was found that people reported lower social anxiety and social desirability and higher self-esteem when they were anonymous than when they were nonanonymous. Furthermore, participants also reported lower social anxiety and social desirability when they were using the Internet than when they were using paper-based methods. Contrast analyses supported the prediction that participants using the WWW anonymously would show the lowest levels of social desirability, whereas participants answering with pen and paper nonanonymously would score highest on the same measure. Implications for the use of the Internet for the collection of psychological data are discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bride, M. (1996).Teach yourself the Internet. London: Hodder Headline.
Buchanan, T., &Smith, J. L. (1999). Using the Internet for psychological research: Personality testing on the World-Wide Web.British Journal of Psychology,90, 125–144.
Carver, C. S., &Scheier, M. F. (1981).Attention and self-regulation: A control theory approach to human behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Cohen, J. (1977).Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (Rev. ed.). New York: Academic Press.
Crowne, D. P., &Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology.Journal of Consulting Psychology,24, 349–354.
Fenigstein, A., Scheier, M. F., &Buss, A. H. (1975). Public and private self-consciousness: Assessment and theory.Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology,43, 522–527.
Greist, J. H., Klein, M. H., &Van Cura, L. J. (1973). A computer interview by psychiatric patient target symptoms.Archives of General Psychiatry,29, 247–253.
Hansen, N. E., &Gladfelter, J. (1996). Teaching graduate psychology seminars using electronic mail: Creative distance education.Teaching of Psychology,23, 252–256.
Joinson, A. N. (1998a). Causes and implications of disinhibited behavior on the Net. In J. Gackenbach (Ed.),Psychology of the Internet (pp. 43–60). New York: Academic Press.
Joinson, A. N. (1998b). Social psychological applications of educational simulation. In J. Rolfe, D. Saunders, & T. Powell (Eds.),Simulation and gaming research yearbook (Vol. 6, pp. 155–160). London: Kogan Page.
Joinson, A. N., &Harris, P. R. (1995).Self-enhancement and selfprotection on the Internet: A study of football fans on the WWW. Paper presented at the BPS London Conference, Institute of Education, London.
Kiesler, S., Siegal, J., &McGuire, T. W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer mediated communication.American Psychologist,39, 1123–1134.
Krantz, J. H., Ballard, J., &Scher, J. (1997). Comparing the results of laboratory and World-Wide Web samples on the determinants of female attractiveness.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,29, 264–269.
Lea, M., &Spears, R. (1991). Computer-mediated communication, deindividuation and group decision making.International Journal of Man-Machine Studies,39, 283–301.
Locke, S. D., &Gilbert, B. O. (1995). Method of psychological assessment, self-disclosure, and experimental differences: A study of computer, questionnaire and interview assessment formats.Journal of Social Behavior & Personality,10, 255–263.
Matheson, K., &Zanna, M. P. (1988). The impact of computermediated communication on self-awareness.Computers in Human Behavior,4, 221–233.
MIDS (1996).Matrix Information and Directory Services 3rd Internet Survey. Downloaded June 1997 from http://www3.mids.org/mn/601/ demo9510.html
Parks, M. R., &Floyd, K. (1996). Making friends in Cyberspace.Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication,1. Downloaded June 1997 from http://jmc.huji.ac.il/vol1/issue4/parks.html
Paulhus, D. L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.),Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 17–59). New York: Academic Press.
Prentice-Dunn, S., &Rogers, R.W. (1982). Effects of public and private self-awareness on deindividuation and aggression.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,43, 503–513.
Reicher, S. D., Spears, R., &Postmes, T. (1995). A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.),European review of social psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 161–198). Chichester, U.K.: Wiley.
Rosenberg, M. (1979).Conceiving the self. New York: Basic Books.
Rosenthal, R., &Rosnow, R. L. (1985).Contrast analysis: Focused comparisons in the analysis of variance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Short, J. A., Williams, E., &Christie, B. (1976).The social psychology of telecommunication. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley.
Stern, S. E., &Faber, J. E. (1997). The lost e-mail method: Milgram’s lost-letter technique in the age of the Internet.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,29, 260–263.
Zimbardo, P. G. (1969). The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order vs. deindividuation, impulse and chaos. In W. J. Arnold & D. Levine (Eds.),Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 237–307). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The author thanks Jo Trivette for her help in the collection of data and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on an earlier draft of this article.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Joinson, A. Social desirability, anonymity, and internet-based questionnaires. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 31, 433–438 (1999). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200723
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200723