Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Changes in the health status of women during and after pregnancy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the changes in health status experienced by a multi-ethnic cohort of women during and after pregnancy.

DESIGN: Observational cohort.

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Pregnant women from 1 of 6 sites in the San Francisco area (N=1,809).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Women who agreed to participate were asked to complete a series of telephone surveys that ascertained health status as well as demographic and medical factors. Substantial changes in health status occurred over the course of pregnancy. For example, physical function declined, from a mean score of 95.2 prior to pregnancy to 58.1 during the third trimester (0–100 scale, where 100 represents better health), and improved during the postpartum period (mean score, 90.7). The prevalence of depressive symptoms rose from 11.7% prior to pregnancy to 25.2% during the third trimester, and then declined to 14.2% during the postpartum period. Insufficient money for food or housing and lack of exercise were associated with poor health status before, during, and after pregnancy.

CONCLUSIONS: Women experience substantial changes in health status during and after pregnancy. These data should guide the expectations of women, their health care providers, and public policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hueston WJ, Kasik-Miller S. Changes in functional health status during normal pregnancy. J Fam Pract. 1998;47:209–12.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Otchet F, Carey MS, Adam L. General health and psychological symptom status in pregnancy and the puerperium: what is normal? Obstet Gynecol. 1999;94:935–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. McKee MD, Cunningham M, Jankowski KR, Zayas L. Health-related functional status in pregnancy: relationship to depression and social support in a multi-ethnic population. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;97:988–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Smith K, Downs B, O'Connell M. Maternity Leave and Employment Patterns: 1961–1955, Vol. P70–79. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau; 2001. Current Population Reports.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Starfield B. Primary Care: Balancing Health Needs, Services, and Technology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Grumbach K, Bodenheimer T. A primary care home for Americans: putting the house in order. JAMA. 2002;288:889–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Haas JS, Meneses V, McCormick MC. Outcomes and health status of socially disadvantaged women during pregnancy. J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 1999;8:547–53.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ware JE Jr. SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston, MA: The Health Institute; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gonzalez VM, Stewart A, Ritter PL, Lorig K. Translation and validation of arthritis outcome measures into Spanish. Arthritis Rheum. 1995;38:1429–46.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ren XS, Amick B III, Zhou L, Gandek B. Translation and psychometric evaluation of a Chinese version of the SF-36 Health Survey in the United States. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:1129–38.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lam CL, Gandek B, Ren XS, Chan MS. Tests of scaling assumptions and construct validity of the Chinese (HK) version of the SF-36 Health Survey. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:1139–47.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Andresen EM, Malmgren JA, Carter WB, Patrick DL. Screening for depression in well older adults: evaluation of a short form of the CES-D (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale). Am J Prev Med. 1994;10:77–84.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Perez-Stable EJ, Marin G, Marin BV, Katz MH. Depressive symptoms and cigarette smoking among Latinos in San Francisco. Am J Public Health. 1990;80:1500–2.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bush B, Shaw S, Cleary P, Delbanco TL, Aronson MD. Screening for alcohol abuse using the CAGE questionnaire. Am J Med. 1987;82:231–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Lu JF, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care. 1994;32:40–66.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Haas JS, McCormick MC. Hospital use and health status of women during the 5 years following the birth of a premature, low-birthweight infant. Am J Public Health. 1997;87:1151–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Goldenberg RL, Rouse DJ. Prevention of premature birth. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:313–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gabbe SG, Niebyl JR, Simpson JL, eds. Obstetrics. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Churchill Linvingstone; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rosenfield A, Maine D. Maternal mortality—a neglected tragedy. Where is the M in MCH? Lancet. 1985;2:83–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Koonin LM, MacKay AP, Berg CJ, Atrash HK, Smith JC. Pregnancy-related mortality surveillance—United States, 1987–1990. MMWR CDC Surveill Summ. 1997;46:17–36.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sachs BP, Brown DA, Driscoll SG, et al. Maternal mortality in Massachusetts. Trends and prevention. N Engl J Med. 1987;316:667–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Tarlov AR, Ware JE Jr, Greenfield S, Nelson EC, Perrin E, Zubkoff M. The Medical Outcomes Study. An application of methods for monitoring the results of medical care. JAMA. 1989;262:925–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Calkins DR, Rubenstein LV, Cleary PD, et al. Failure of physicians to recognize functional disability in ambulatory patients. Ann Intern Med. 1991;114:451–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ganz PA, Moinpour CM, Pauler DK, et al. Health status and quality of life in patients with early-stage Hodgkin’s disease treated on Southwest Oncology Group Study 9133. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:3512–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ruo B, Rumsfeld JS, Hlatky MA, Liu H, Browner WS, Whooley MA. Depressive symptoms and health-related quality of life: the Heart and Soul Study. JAMA. 2003;290:215–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rumsfeld JS, MaWhinney S, McCarthy M Jr, et al. Health-related quality of life as a predictor of mortality following coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Participants of the Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group on Processes, Structures, and Outcomes of Care in Cardiac Surgery. JAMA. 1999;281:1298–303.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Eisenman DP, Gelberg L, Liu H, Shapiro MF. Mental health and health-related quality of life among adult Latino primary care patients living in the United States with previous exposure to political violence. JAMA. 2003;290:627–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Permanyer G, Alonso J, Alijarde-Guimera M, Soler-Soler J. Comparison of perceived health status and conventional functional evaluation in stable patients with coronary artery disease. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44:779–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lee TH, Shammash JB, Ribeiro JP, Hartley LH, Sherwood J, Goldman L. Estimation of maximum oxygen uptake from clinical data: performance of the Specific Activity Scale. Am Heart J. 1988;115(pt 1):203–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. McCallum J, Shadbolt B, Wang D. Self-related health and survival: a 7-year follow-up study of Australian elderly. Am J Public Health. 1994;84:1100–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Lowrie EG, Curtin RB, Lepain N, Schatell D. Medical outcomes study short form-36: a consistent and powerful predictor of morbidity and mortality in dialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 2003;41:1286–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. O’Hara MW, Zekoski EM, Philipps LH, Wright EJ. Controlled prospective study of postpartum mood disorders: comparison of childbearing and nonchildbearing women. J Abnorm Psychol. 1990;99:3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Evans J, Heron J, Francomb H, Oke S, Golding J. Cohort study of depressed mood during pregnancy and after childbirth. BMJ. 2001;323:257–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Georgiopoulos AM, Bryan TL, Yawn BP, Houston MS, Rummans TA, Therneau TM. Population-based screening for postpartum depression. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;93(pt 1):653–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Pajulo M, Savonlahti E, Sourander A, Helenius H, Piha J. Antenatal depression, substance dependency and social support. J Affect Disord. 2001;65:9–17.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Marcus SM, Flynn HA, Blow FC, Barry KL. Depressive symptoms among pregnant women screened in obstetrics settings. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2003;12:373–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kessler RC, McGonagle KA, Zhao S, et al. Lifetime and 12-month prevalence of DSM-III-R psychiatric disorders in the United States. Results from the National Comorbidity Survey. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1994;51:8–19.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Dayan J, Creveuil C, Herlicoviez M, et al. Role of anxiety and depression in the onset of spontaneous preterm labor. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;155:293–301.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. ACOG committee opinion. Exercise during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Number 267, January 2002. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2002;77:79–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kramer MS. Aerobic exercise for women during pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;(2):CD000180. Review.

  41. McGovern P, Dowd B, Gjerdingen D, Moscovice I, Kochevar L, Murphy S. The determinants of time off work after childbirth. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2000;25:527–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Sydsjo G, Sydsjo A. Newly delivered women’s evaluation of personal health status and attitudes towards sickness absence and social benefits. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2002;81:104–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Perneger TV, Etter JF, Rougemont A. Prospective versus retrospective measurement of change in health status: a community based study in Geneva, Switzerland. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1997;51:320–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer S. Haas MD, MSPH.

Additional information

None of the authors has a conflict of interest.

This work was supported by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01 HD37389).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haas, J.S., Jackson, R.A., Fuentes-Afflick, E. et al. Changes in the health status of women during and after pregnancy. J GEN INTERN MED 20, 45–51 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.40097.x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.40097.x

Key Words

Navigation