Skip to main content
Log in

Factor Structure and Reliability of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales for Incarcerated Female Substance Abusers

  • Published:
Journal of Family Violence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Incarcerated women with a history of substance abuse often experience intimate partner violence (IPV), both as victims and as perpetrators. The issues surrounding partner violence and substance abuse are complex, and accurate assessment of this population's experience is critical to ensure proper treatment planning and program development. One of the most common instruments with which to measure IPV is the Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS). Unfortunately, very little published data exist on the revised version of the Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2), and no data could be located in the literature using this scale with incarcerated women. The purpose of this investigation was to examine the underlying factor structure and reliability of the CTS2 for 359 incarcerated women who had voluntarily participated in a 1–year long substance abuse treatment program. Item analysis revealed a high level of reliability for the overall scale as well as for the individual subscales. Additionally, results from the confirmatory multiple group factor analysis support the 5 underlying subscales, and taken together indicate that the scale is acceptable to use with this population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Abram, K. M., and Teplin, L. A. (1991). Co-occurring disordersamongmentally ill jail detainees: Implications for public policy. Am. Psychol. 46: 1036–1045.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association (1996). Report of the American Psychological Association Presidential task force on violence and the family. Violence and the family.Washington,DC.

  • Bernstein, I. H., Jaremko, M. E., and Hinkley, B. S. (1994). On the utility of the SCL-90–R with low-back pain patients. Spine 19: 42–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, I. H., Jaremko, M. E., and Hinkley, B. S. (1995). On the utility of theWest Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory. Spine 20: 956–963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, I. H., and Keith, J. B. (1991). Reexamination of Eisen, Sellman, and McAlister's Health Belief Model Questionnaire. Health Educ. Q. 18: 207–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browning, J., and Dutton, D. (1986). Assessment of wife assault with the conflict tactics scale: Using couple data to quantify the differential reporting effect. J. Marr. Fam. 48: 375–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowley, S. L., and Fan, X. (1997). Structural equation modeling: Basic concepts and applications in personality assessment research. J. Pers. Assess. 68: 508–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, D. G. (1995). Intimate abusiveness. Clin. Psychol. Sci. Pract. 2: 207–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, D. G. (1999). Traumatic origins of intimate rage. Aggression Viol. Behav. 4: 431–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor Analysis, 2nd edn., Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorsuch, R. L. (1988). UniuMult: For Univariate and Multivariate Analysis, Unimult, Altadena, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorsuch, R. L. (1996). Exploratory factor analysis: Its role in item analysis. J. Pers. Assess. 68: 532–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haney, C., and Zimbardo, P. (1998). The past and future of U.S. prison policy. Twenty-five years after the Stanford prison experiment. Am. Psychol. 53: 709–727.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassebaum, G., and Chandler, S.-M. (1994). Polydrug use and self control among men and women in prisons. J. Drug Educ. 24: 333–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, E., Heyman, R. E., and O'Leary, K. D. (1995). Correspondence between telephone and written assessments of physical violence in marriage. Behav. Ther. 26: 671–680.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucente, S. (1999a). MCMI-III characteristics and the 'cry for help' profile in incarcerated female substance abusers. In Flynn, P. (Chair), Correctional applications of the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-III. Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Boston, MA, August 1999.

  • Lucente, S. (1999b). Rates of intimate partner violence reported by incarcerated female substance abusers. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Boston, MA, August 1999.

  • Martin, S. L., Cotten, N. U., Browne, D. C., and Kurtz, B. (1995). Family violence and depressive symptomatology among incarcerated women. J. Fam. Viol. 10: 399–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., Krueger, R. F., Magdol, L., Margolin, G., Silva, P. A., and Sydney, R. (1997). Do partners agree about abuse in their relationship? A psychometric evaluation of interpartner agreement. Psychol. Assess. 9: 47–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morash, M., Haarr, R., and Rucker, L. (1994). A comparison of programming for women and men in U.S. prisons in the 1980's. Crime Delinq. 40: 197–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (1994). Assessing drug abuse among adolescents and adults: Standardized instruments (NIH PublicationNo. 94–3757).U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnaly, J., and Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan, H. S., Neidig, P. H., and O'Leary, K. D. (1994). Male-female and aggressor-victim differences in the factor structure of the modified conflict tactics scale. J. Interpers. Viol. 9: 366–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodenburg, F. A., and Fantuzzo, J. W. (1993). The measure of wife abuse: Steps toward the development of a comprehensive assessment technique. J. Fam. Viol. 8: 203–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, J., Caetano, R., and Clark,C. (1997a). "Liar, liar, pants on fire:" Differential reporting of intimate partner violence. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Chicago, IL, August 1997.

  • Schafer, J., Caetano, R., and Clark, C. (1997b). Methodological issues related to measuring spousal violence with a modified version of the CTS: Results from a sample of U.S. couples. Paper presented at the 5th International Family violence Conference, Durham, NH.

  • Singer, M. I., Bussey, J., Song, L., and Lunghofer, L. (1995). The psychosocial issues of women serving time in jail. Soc. Work 40: 103–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics Scales. J. Marr. Fam. 41: 75–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Boney-McCoy, S., and Sugarman, D. B. (1996). The revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2). J. Fam. Issues 17: 283–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valle, S. K., Demos, N., Broaddus, R., Mango, B., Cohen, L., Parrott, M., and Fry, B. (1998). Integrating substance abuse and domestic violence treatment. Corrections Compendium, March 1998.

  • Wexler, H. K., and Love, C. T. (1991).Therapeutic communities in prison [Monograph]. National Institute on Drug Abuse 144: 181–208.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lucente, S.W., Fals-Stewart, W., Richards, H.J. et al. Factor Structure and Reliability of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales for Incarcerated Female Substance Abusers. Journal of Family Violence 16, 437–450 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012281027999

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012281027999

Navigation