Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of mortality rates in three prospective studies from Copenhagen with mortality rates in the central part of the city, and the entire country

  • Published:
European Journal of Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Valid generalizations of results from population-based epidemiological surveys requires knowledge about how representative the sample is. The Copenhagen Center for Prospective Population Studies have assessed mortality on the basis of pooled data from three research programmes in the region of Copenhagen. In two of the studies, subjects were randomly selected, using the Danish Central Population Registry, within certain age groups and area-restricted sectors of the Greater Copenhagen. In the third study, men employed in 14 companies participated. Participation rates were between 78% and 87% in the three programmes. Standardized mortality rates (SMR) were calculated in relation to mortality rates in the municipality of Copenhagen and in the whole country in three age groups and the two genders. SMR values in the whole sample including non-participants were similar to rates for Copenhagen in the Copenhagen City Heart Study, whereas mortality rates in the Glostrup Population Studies were similar to rates for the whole country. The mortality rates among participants were lower than in the whole sample, and differences existed in relation to region and selection criteria of the cohorts. The Copenhagen Male Study, where only employed men were included, showed the lowest mortality rates, and higher rates were found in the study from the central part of the City (the Copenhagen City Heart Study) compared to the study from the suburbs (the Glostrup Population Studies). The difference between mortality rates in the cohorts and in Copenhagen City decreased with increasing age. The SMR converged towards 1.00 with increasing observation time. In conlusion, high participation rates were found in all three studies, resulting in SMR values for participants only slightly lower than in the source population in the two randomly selected samples, but 30% lower values in the sample of employed men. As mortality rates in the total samples including non-participants were markedly higher than among the participants, generalizations of results for participants to the whole population should be made with caution, especially during the first years of observation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rothman KJ. Causes. Am J Epidemiol 1976; 104: 587–592.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Paikin H, Jacobsen B, Schulsinger F, et al. Characteristics of people who refused to participate in a social and psychopathological study. In: Mednick SA, Schulsinger F, Higgins J, et al. (eds), Genetics, environment and psychopathology. New York: North-Holland Publishing Company, 1974: 291–339.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sonne-Holm S, Sørensen TIA, Jensen G et al. Influence of fatness, intelligence, education and sociodemographic factors on response rate in a health survey. J Epidemiol Comm Health 1990; 43: 369–374.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gordon T, Moore FE, Shurtleff D et al. Some methodologic problems in the long-term study of cardiovascular disease: Observations on the Framingham Study. J Chron Dis 1959; 10: 186–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cobb S, King S, Chen E. Differences between respondents and nonrespondents in a morbidity survey involving clinical examination. J Chron Dis 1957; 6: 95–108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bruhn JG. Sociological factors related to participation in a screening clinic for heart disease. Soc Sci Med 1969; 3: 85–93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Janzon L, Hanson BS, Isacsson S-O et al. Factors influencing participation in health surveys. Results from prospective population study 'Men born in 1914' in Malmö, Sweden. J Epidemiol Comm Health 1986; 40: 174–177.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rosengren A, Wilhelmsen L, Berglund G et al. Non-participants in a general population study of men, with special reference to social and alcoholic problems. Acta Med Scand 1987; 221: 243–251.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tibblin G. A population study of 50-year-old-men. An analysis of the non-participation group. Acta Med Scand 1965; 178: 453–459.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Criqui MH, Barrett-Connor E, Austin MA. Differences between respondents and non-respondents in a population-based cardiovascular disease study. Am J Epidemiol 1978; 108: 367–372.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Milne JS, Maule MM, Williamson J. Method of sampling in a study of older people with a comparison of respondents and non-respondents. Brit J Prev Soc Med 1971; 25: 37–41.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jensen G. Epidemiology of chest pain and angina pectoris. Acta Med Scand 1983; suppl 682: 13–19.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wilhelmsen L, Ljungberg S, Wedel H et al. A comparison between participants and non-participants in a primary prevention trial. J Chron Dis 1976; 29: 331–339.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Strandberg TE, Salomaa VV, Vanhanen HT et al. Mortality in participants and non-participants of a multifactorial prevention study of cardiovascular diseases: A 28 year follow up of the Helsinki Businessmen Study. Br Heart J 1995; 74: 449–454.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Walker M, Shaper AG, Cook DG. Non-participation and mortality in a prospective study of cardiovascular disease. J Epidemiol Comm Health 1987; 41: 295–299.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Appleyard M, Hansen AT, Jensen G et al. The Copenhagen City Heart Study. Østerbroundersøgelsen. A book of tables with data from the first examination (1976–1978) and a five-year follow-up (1981–1983). Scand J Soc Med 1987; suppl 41.

  17. Hagerup LM, Schroll M, Hollnagel H et al. The Glostrup Population Studies. Collection of epidemiological tables. Scand J Soc Med 1981; suppl.20.

  18. Gyntelberg F. Physical fitness and coronary heart disease in Copenhagen men aged 40–59 III. Dan Med Bull 1974; 21: 49–56.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Andersen, L.B., Vestbo, J., Juel, K. et al. A comparison of mortality rates in three prospective studies from Copenhagen with mortality rates in the central part of the city, and the entire country. Eur J Epidemiol 14, 579–585 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007485116788

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007485116788

Navigation