Elsevier

Toxicology Letters

Volume 180, Issue 2, 15 August 2008, Pages 151-156
Toxicology Letters

The Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) in risk assessment

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2008.05.006Get rights and content

Abstract

The Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) is a level of human intake or exposure that is considered to be of negligible risk, despite the absence of chemical-specific toxicity data. The TTC approach is a form of risk characterisation in which uncertainties arising from the use of data on other compounds are balanced against the low level of exposure. The approach was initially developed by the FDA for packaging migrants, and used a single threshold value of 1.5 μg/day (called the threshold of regulation). Subsequent analyses of chronic toxicity data resulted in the development of TTC values for three structural classes with different potentials for toxicity (1,800, 540 and 90 μg/day). These TTC values have been incorporated into the procedure that is used internationally for the evaluation of flavouring substances. Further developments included additional TTC values for certain structural alerts for genotoxicity (0.15 μg/day), and for the presence of an organophosphate group (18 μg/day). All of these TTC values were incorporated into an extended decision tree for chemicals, such as contaminants, which might be present in human foods. The TTC approach has been shown to have potential applications to risk assessments of cosmetic ingredients, household products and impurities in therapeutic drugs.

Introduction

Humans are exposed daily to increasing numbers of chemicals from food, cosmetics, household products, medicines and the environment. Extensive safety data exist for some of these chemicals, but for others only limited data are available currently. Nevertheless, risk assessment for all chemicals is necessary to ensure that the health of the population is not adversely affected. Intentional addition of chemicals to food without adequate safety assessment is not acceptable; however, the generation of substance-specific toxicity data on the thousands of chemicals that may be present at low levels in food, due to migration from packaging or the use of flavouring substances, is not feasible in the near future. Thus, a rigorous, scientifically sound, and practical approach is necessary to allow risk characterisation of the myriad of chemicals to which humans are exposed.

For individual chemicals with known toxicological profiles, there are established procedures for determining levels of exposure without significant health risks to humans. For non-genotoxic chemicals a conventional toxicological safety evaluation relies on the identification of the highest dose level, usually derived from animal toxicity studies, at which the most sensitive adverse effect does not occur, and application of an adequate margin of safety to determine a level of exposure that is likely to be safe in humans.

The Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) approach is based on the concept that reasonable assurance of safety can be given, even in the absence of chemical-specific toxicity data, providing that the intake is sufficiently low, i.e. that an exposure level can be defined below which there is no significant risk to human health (JECFA, 2006). The approach is based on the knowledge gained from the general toxicity database that has been developed in the past 50–60 years. The TTC approach is a form of risk characterisation that balances uncertainties inherent in extrapolation of these data to an unstudied substance against the predicted or known low level of exposure.

Section snippets

Packaging migrants and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) threshold of regulation

The concept of a threshold level of intake giving a negligible risk for chemicals without toxicity data was initially proposed by Frawley (1967) for substances intended for use in food-packaging materials. The FDA decided that for substances present in food contact materials, known as indirect additives, it would perform only an abbreviated safety assessment, mainly focused on intake without the need for specific toxicity testing if the concentration in food is below 0.5 ppb (parts per billion).

Flavouring substances and the development of TTC values for different structural groups

The TTC concept was extended by Munro et al. (1996) who developed human exposure thresholds for each of three structural classes of chemicals (Class I, II and III) identified using the Cramer et al. (1978) decision tree. This decision tree divides chemicals into the three classes based on structural properties suggestive of varying inherent risks of toxicity.

  • (i)

    Class I substances have simple structures, are efficiently metabolised and are of low potential toxicity.

  • (ii)

    Class II substances are less

TTC values for structural alerts for possible genotoxicity and carcinogenicity and the development of a decision tree for general chemicals in food, including contaminants

The application of the structural class TTC values developed by Munro et al. (1996) to substances other than flavours has been the subject of a number of reviews (Kroes et al., 2000, Barlow et al., 2001); these identified that the distribution of NOAELs for neurotoxins was at lower doses than the Class III distribution, indicating that the Class III TTC value might not be adequate for such compounds. Kroes et al. (2004) undertook additional analyses and expanded the procedure that was initially

Application of TTC values to cosmetics

Kroes et al. (2007) analysed the appropriateness of the Kroes et al. (2004) decision tree to the safety evaluation of cosmetic ingredients. Topical exposure could affect toxicity in two ways. First, the stratum corneum represents a permeability barrier, so that only a fraction of the applied topical dose would reach the systemic circulation. Second, many compounds undergo significant metabolism in the gut lumen, gut mucosa and the liver during their absorption from the gut, which could result

Application of TTC values to household products

Blackburn et al. (2005) evaluated the applicability of the TTC database to ingredients used in personal and household care products, based on comparison of the range of chemical structures with those in the original Munro et al. (1996) database. They also investigated the range of NOAELs for selected ingredients in structural Classes I (21 chemicals), II (2 chemicals) and III (21 chemicals) compared with the NOAELs in the original database. NOAELs from long-term toxicity studies were not

Application of the TTC value for potential genotoxicity/carcinogenicity to genotoxic impurities in medicinal products

Although the TTC approach is not intended to be used for compounds for which there are established risk assessment procedures, such as food additives, pesticides and therapeutic drugs, it has been applied recently to develop a method for determining maximum levels of genotoxic impurities in medicinal products (Müller et al., 2006). Analytical testing requirements for pharmaceutical products are usually based on practicability rather than the potential for toxicity. Because the synthetic routes

Structural class definitions

The approach is based on application of the Cramer et al. (1978) decision tree, which was developed primarily for flavouring substances. Although this has been validated for wider application by the analyses undertaken by Munro et al. (1996), it has not been checked against recent toxicity data or structure-activity relationships. A reconsideration of the decision tree, and revision to exclude questions related to natural occurrence in foods would increase confidence in its wider application.

Modification of the Kroes et al. (2004) decision tree

Conclusions

Application of the TTC concept in the absence of chemical-specific data is a pragmatic approach that allows the safety evaluation of chemicals to which humans are exposed in food and the environment. A strength of the approach is that unnecessary animal studies are not performed because it identifies those chemicals that need additional testing. Although the TTC approach has been formally applied only in the evaluation of flavouring substances and packaging materials, there are no restrictive

Conflict of interest statement

IM and AGR have been Temporary Advisors at JECFA Meetings that evaluated flavouring agents. AGR was a member of the ILSI-Europe Expert Group on the TTC and of the Colipa Expert Group chaired by Professor Kroes that developed the paper on application of TTC to cosmetics.

References (27)

Cited by (146)

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text