Health LiteracyAbilities, skills and knowledge in measures of health literacy
Introduction
Health literacy, defined as an individual's ability to obtain and use health information to make choices about health care, is related to patients’ health [1], [2], health status, service utilization, self-care behaviors, and even risk for death [2], [3] and has been tied to race- and ethnicity-related disparities [4], [5], [6]. In spite of the large amount of research on it, important questions about health literacy remain, such as how it can most effectively be defined to facilitate measurement and develop effective interventions. In most studies, health literacy has been assessed as patient performance on a test of health literacy, but each of the commonly used measures evaluates health literacy in a different way. In some instances, health literacy is defined as reading comprehension (the Reading subtest of Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults, or TOFHLA [7]), sight-word reading (the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine, or REALM [8]), calculation (the Numeracy subtest of the TOFHLA), or identifying synonyms (the Short Assessment of Health Literacy for Spanish Adults, or SAHLSA [9]). Each of these strategies assesses something related to health literacy, but their diversity leaves open the question of what each has in common with the “social construct of health literacy”. [10]
Each measure samples different content, uses different response formats, and has been developed on different populations [11]. The TOFHLA, for example, evaluates reading comprehension by asking a person to supply words eliminated from the text (the cloze procedure), while its numeracy scale asks that he or she explain how to take medications. The REALM requires the person to correctly read aloud words related to healthcare. The need for a similar measure for Spanish speakers led to the development of the SAHLSA, but the low frequency of orthographically irregular words in Spanish meant that it was necessary to develop a different response format. The SAHLSA asks the person tested to view a stimulus word on a card and choose which of two other words is most similar in meaning.
Performance on these measures requires reading and health knowledge, and several, especially the TOFHLA subtests, also require reasoning, problem solving and numeracy [12]. The variety of contents and formats, however, suggests that the abilities, skills, and knowledge required for successful performance on each are different [13], [14]. Griffin et al., for example, showed substantial differences in which patients were identified as having limited health literacy by different measures [15], and similar findings have been reported in other studies [13], [16]. Because of this, it was hypothesized that more clearly establishing the relations of widely used tests of health literacy to other variables might provide a better understand what each measures. It was also hypothesized that a better understanding would also provide a clearer picture of what health literacy is by more clearly delineating its component skills. In this paper, it is hypothesized that the variables most relevant to health literacy are individuals’ general cognitive abilities and academic skills, and their health-related knowledge, after their demographic characteristics (race, ethnicity, age, and SES) are taken into account.
Studies have shown that health literacy is related to age, race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. For example, persons older than 65 years of age performed at lower levels on the Health Literacy scale of the National Assessment of Adult Literacy [17]. Blacks and Hispanics have also been shown to perform at lower levels on measures of health literacy. Closely intertwined with other demographic characteristics is socioeconomic status, itself related to health literacy [18]. The finding that English-speaking Hispanics may be at a disadvantage to non-Hispanics when their health literacy is assessed in English [19] suggests that preferred language may also be a key characteristic. Gender may also be related to performance on tests of health literacy [19].
Understanding the relation of tests of health literacy to basic cognitive abilities (or intelligence, often assessed by IQ tests) may be especially important since research has shown that both general intellectual abilities and health literacy are related to health [20], [21], [22], [23]. General intellectual ability can be defined as reflecting a person's acquired knowledge and communication ability (crystallized ability) and capacity to reason and solve novel problems (fluid ability) [24], [25], [26]. Baker et al. [23] showed that overall performance on the Mini-mental State Exam (MMSE; [27]) was related to S-TOFHLA scores. Levinthal et al. [28] evaluated the relation of demographic and cognitive variables to performance on the S-TOFHLA and found that both were related. Chin et al. [21] found that age, education, basic cognitive abilities, and disease-related knowledge were related to performance on the S-TOHLA and REALM. Others have shown that performance on tests of health literacy is related to various abilities including memory, verbal fluency, reasoning, and general intellectual functioning [22], [29], [30].
By its very nature, health literacy appears related to academic skills such as reading and mathematics [31], [32], [33]. Academic skills can be distinguished from basic cognitive abilities by their acquisition via formal instruction during schooling. While basic cognitive abilities are thought to be stable over time [34], academic skills such as reading, writing, and arithmetic are amenable to change through formal interventions well into adult life [35]. While it is important to distinguish between general reading skills and health literacy [36], [37], the correlation between patients’ performance on measures of academic skills and health literacy has been presented as evidence of the measures’ validity [7], [38].
In addition to demographics, cognitive abilities and academic skills, health knowledge is related both to performance on tests of health literacy and health. Disease-specific knowledge, for example, has been linked to health literacy in diabetes [39], hypertension [21], [40], HIV infection [41], asthma, and congestive heart failure [40].
These studies illustrate the diverse influences affecting performance on tests of health literacy. Demographics, cognitive abilities, academic skills, and health knowledge are each related to scores on measures of health literacy. Few studies have included variables from all of these domains, however, and studies that have used variables from multiple domains have shown that variables from one domain may reduce the importance of others. In this paper, it is hypothesized that after taking demographic characteristics into account, each group of variables will define health literacy as a unique entity depending on a person's general intellectual abilities, academic skills and health-related knowledge (ASK).
Section snippets
Method
As part of a larger study whose purpose has been to develop a new computer-administered measure of health literacy [42], participants completed a battery of general intellectual, academic skills, and health literacy measures. They were recruited from the community through publicity at various local organizations, distribution of flyers, and referral by persons who had already completed the study.
Results
Descriptive statistics for the sample are presented in Table 1. Our sample intentionally included participants from a wide range of ages (18–85) and the mean age for the combined sample was 51.0 years (standard deviation = 16.5). The sample included individuals with a wide range of education (3–20 years) with a combined sample mean of 12.9 years (standard deviation = 2.6).
Regression models are presented in Table 2, Table 3, Table 4, Table 5. Results for the TOFHLA Reading subtest (Table 2) show
Discussion
The purpose of these analyses was to assess how performance on health literacy measures was related to abilities, skills, and knowledge as specified by the ASK model. Results for several measures support the model, especially those for the TOFHLA Reading subscale. Support was less substantial for other measures, but all included at least one model element. Analyses for each measure do not uniformly include model elements, suggesting that important aspects of health literacy as measured by some
Conflict of interest
The authors state that they have no conflict of interest in the study.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by a grant to Dr. Ownby from the US National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL096578). The authors also acknowledge other members of the team of investigators: Drs. Sara J. Czaja and David Loewenstein (Center on Aging at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine), Rosemary Davenport, RN, MSN, ARNP, Study Coordinator, Dr. Ana-Maria Homs, Assessor, and Ms. Lilly Valiente who provided data management assistance.
References (56)
- et al.
Health literacy: an overlooked factor in understanding HIV health disparities
Am J Prev Med
(2007) - et al.
Critical appraisal of health literacy indices revealed variable underlying constructs, narrow content and psychometric weaknesses
J Clin Epidemiol
(2011) - et al.
Performance of the English and Spanish S-TOFHLA among publicly insured medicaid and medicare patients
Patient Educ Couns
(2005) - et al.
Mini-mental state. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician
J Psychiatr Res
(1975) - et al.
The association between health literacy and indicators of cognitive impairment in a diverse sample of primary care patients
Patient Educ Couns
(2013) The evolving concept of health literacy
Soc Sci Med
(2008)- et al.
Health literacy and knowledge of chronic disease
Patient Educ Couns
(2003) - et al.
The effect of progressive, reinforcing telephone education and counseling versus brief educational intervention on knowledge, self-care behaviors and heart failure symptoms
J Card Fail
(2011) - et al.
Goal setting in diabetes self-management: taking the baby steps to success
Patient Educ Couns
(2009) - et al.
Development of a brief test to measure functional health literacy
Patient Educ Couns
(1999)
Health literacy interventions and outcomes: an updated systematic review. Evidence report/technology assessment no. 199
Literacy and health outcomes: a systematic review of the literature
J Gen Intern Med
Low health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic review
Ann Intern Med
Health literacy explains racial disparities in diabetes medication adherence
J Health Commun
Promoting health literacy research to reduce health disparities
J Health Commun
The Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults: a new instrument for measuring patients’ literacy skills
J Gen Intern Med
Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM): a quick reading test for patients
J Read
Development of an easy-to-use Spanish health literacy test
Health Serv Res
Health literacy measurement: a proposed research agenda
J Health Commun
Coming to consensus on health literacy measurement: an online discussion and consensus-gauging process
Nurs Outlook
Health literacy is related to problem solving
Measurement variation across health literacy assessments: implications for assessment selection in research and practice
J Health Commun
Variation in estimates of limited health literacy by assessment instruments and non-response bias
J Gen Intern Med
Measuring adult literacy in health care: performance of the newest vital sign
Am J Health Behav
The health literacy of America's adults: results from the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy (NCES 2006-483)
The causal pathways linking health literacy to health outcomes
Am J Health Behav
Towards understanding the links between health literacy and physical health
Health Psychol
The process-knowledge model of health literacy: evidence from a componential analysis of two commonly used measures
J Health Commun
Cited by (41)
Patient activation and medication adherence in adults
2024, Journal of the American Pharmacists AssociationDevelopment of KROHL, a tool for evaluating oral health knowledge
2022, PEC InnovationUnderstanding Health Literacy for People Living With HIV: Locations of Learning
2018, Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS CareHealth literacy and its correlates in informal caregivers of adults with memory loss
2018, Geriatric NursingCitation Excerpt :Pearson product-moment correlations, Spearman's rank-order correlations, and point-biserial correlations were used to examine bivariate associations between health literacy and other measures. In accord with the approach by Ownby et al.,16 a four-step hierarchical multiple linear regression was conducted to assess the impact of each element of the ASK model on caregiver health literacy progressively. With a fixed sample size of 91 for this secondary analysis, we would have at least 0.80 power to detect a population R2 as small as 0.157 for the overall regression model with 8 predictors at a significance level of 0.05 for two-sided hypothesis testing with an F-test.