Elsevier

Health & Place

Volume 11, Issue 3, September 2005, Pages 237-248
Health & Place

Is there a link between rates of common mental disorder and deficits in social capital in Gospel Oak, London?: Results from a qualitative study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2004.05.002Get rights and content

Abstract

Previous research in Gospel Oak indicates high-rates of common mental disorder. This paper explores how far deficits in social capital may be linked to these rates. Interviews, focus groups and participant observation were conducted to assess social capital in Gospel Oak from the phenomenological experience of residents. The data suggested that most residents perceived the neighbourhood to be rich in well-developed facilities, services and associational activity. Residents also generally expressed satisfaction with local trust and reciprocity. The results do not support the hypothesis that rates of common mental disorder in Gospel Oak are linked to deficits in social capital. Compositional factors may be more important in accounting for these rates.

Introduction

Common mental disorder (CMD) is a term used to describe a heterogeneous range of disorders characterised by anxiety and depressive symptoms “commonly encountered in community settings and whose occurrence signals a breakdown in normal functioning” (Goldberg and Huxley, 1992).

Prevalence of CMD in the United Kingdom (UK) has been reliably estimated through the UK National Psychiatric Morbidity Surveys (UK NPMS). The first occurred in 1993 (Meltzer et al., 1995), the second in 2000 (Singleton et al., 2001). Both sampled close to 10 000 randomly selected individuals screened for psychiatric morbidity using the Revised Version of the Clinical Interview Schedule (CIS-R; Lewis and Peloti, 1990).

The UK NPMS shows a clear excess of CMD in urban areas. In the 2000 UK NPMS the urban areas of London and North-West England had the highest prevalence rates of CIS-R scores above 12, an accepted cut-off point for ascertaining the presence of a CMD. This was a repetition of results found in the 1993 survey. The 1993 survey showed higher prevalence of CIS-R scores above 12 in urban areas with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.21 (95% CI 1.06–1.38). Two competing theories exist to explain elevated rates of CMD in urban areas-compositional theory and contextual theory.

Section snippets

Compositional theory

Compositional theory (also known as drift theory) focuses on the characteristics of individuals living in urban environments, rather than the urban environment per se. A fundamental proposition of compositional theory is that people currently experiencing (or with a life history of) mental health stress “drift” to large urban environments. These people are posited to bring their pre-existing mental illnesses or vulnerability factors with them, thus inflating rates in these urban areas.

Another

Contextual theory

Contextual theory (also known as “breeder” theory) accounts for elevated rates of CMD in urban areas by focusing on collectively experienced characteristics of the environment rather than risk factors experienced solely at the individual level. They rely on a belief that certain common supra-individual exposures in urban areas have a deleterious affect on mental health, thus creating a generic increase in risk for residents. These factors include pollution, noise, lack of open space, urban

Social capital and mental health

Most studies of social capital and health have focused on physical health outcomes. However it has been suggested that social capital may play a positive role in determining mental health outcomes (McKenzie et al., 2002). Putnam himself marshals evidence supporting this link quoting Seligman's observation that “the rate of depression over the last two generations has increased roughly tenfold” (Putnam, 2000, p. 261). Putnam ascribes this “increase” to a widespread decrease in social capital

Site of study

Gospel Oak is an electoral ward in the London Borough of Camden with approximately 6 200 residents. It is a mixed tenure area, streets of privately owned Georgian housing mark the North whereas the South is occupied overwhelmingly by Camden Council's Gospel Oak Housing Estate. This estate consists of a series of discreet sub-estates built in the early nineteen-seventies. The Ward is generally typical of inner-London in terms of demographic characteristics; 62% of dwellings are local authority

Sampling strategy and participants

The epidemiological study of Gospel Oak described in the introduction is ongoing. In 1999 a quantitative cross-sectional survey was carried out of nearly 1000 residents. Individual participants were selected using random probability sampling methods (see Weich et al., 2002 for further details). Participants’ mental health status was assessed using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). Data was also collected on participants’ demographic and socio-economic

Processes and questions

Twenty-six residents participated in in-depth interviews (two of these unavoidably became family interviews). Six attended one of two focus groups. Almost all interviews occurred in resident's homes, lasting on average one hour. All were conducted by the first author and recorded onto audiocassette using a small dictaphone. They were then transcribed verbatim into a word-processing package for later analysis. We gave participants the choice of whether they would rather participate in interviews

Participant observation

Participant observation was also conducted on a regular basis over a 24-month period by the first author to compliment the data gathered from other sources. Two related strategies guided the participant observation, both aiming to ensure the maximum data possible was gathered relevant to the research question.

Firstly the researcher attempted to cultivate a trusted relationship with approximately a dozen key informants who lived and/or worked in the area. These included shopkeepers, activists,

Data analysis

All this data was used to assist us in our attempt to assess the phenomenological meaning and influence of local social capital on aspects related to mental health of residents. As suggested by Geertz (1973) we attempted to build an overall thick-description throughout the analysis, maintaining complexity and links between the data. Simultaneously, we proceeded to sort the data according to the method proposed by Miles and Huberman (1994) of reducing data through thematic grouping, with ongoing

Results

The results are divided into two principal components. Firstly we examine data collected with regards to what could be understood as structural aspects of social capital in Gospel Oak such as organisations, networks, facilities and services. Secondly we examine data related to more inter-personal aspects of social capital in the neighbourhood such as trust and reciprocity. This division is theoretically driven in that these two components have been consistently and most commonly identified as

Structural aspects of social capital in Gospel Oak

We examined aspects of facilities, services and organisations in Gospel Oak. These have been identified as variables that are crucial for the formation and development of social capital (Cattell, 2001; Baum and Palmer, 2002). They also indicate some of the principal characteristics of social capital as defined by Putnam for example density of community networks, civic engagement and civic identity/sense of belonging.

Reciprocity and trust in Gospel Oak

In this second principal section of the results we explore the more relational aspects of social capital in Gospel Oak, most notably trust and reciprocity. We found that most residents stated that they felt the area was one with satisfactory levels of trust and that this made them feel good about themselves and Gospel Oak. Brian is a senior citizen with a mental illness. He remarks, like many others, how he looks after other residents’ keys:

We have hanging on our nail on our dining room four

Social capital and common mental disorder

In overall terms, most residents we encountered reported qualitative satisfaction with components deemed to define social capital such as trust and community networks. This married well with ethnographic evidence gathered through participant observation. Thus the data does not support the hypothesis, suggested by prior research and speculation, that gross rates of CMD in Gospel Oak are linked to deficits in social capital. If there is any affect on mental health the data suggests social capital

Conclusion

The principal research question in this study did not demand a very finely nuanced description and analysis. This question arose from real speculation that deficits in social capital may be linked to gross rates of CMD. In overall terms the results suggest that the residents we encountered generally seemed satisfied with social capital in the neighbourhood, and they interpreted this as having a positive influence on their mental well-being. This married well with our own ethnographic analysis

Acknowledgements

The study was funded by the UK Medical Research Council in the form of a research studentship to RW, who was also assisted financially by a Macrae bursary of the King's College Theological Trust. We are eternally grateful. The research took place while RW was a research student at the Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London. The fieldwork was facilitated by the kindness of Prof. Michael King and the Academic Dept. of Psychiatry, Royal Free and University College Medical Schools-Royal

References (56)

  • G.W. Brown et al.

    The social origins of depression

    (1978)
  • Ward comparisons, London Borough of Camden

    (2000)
  • C. Campbell et al.

    Social Capital and Health

    (1999)
  • H. Cooper et al.

    The Influence of Social Support and Social Capital on Health

    (1999)
  • J.R.M. Copeland et al.

    Depression in Europe

    British Journal of Psychiatry

    (1999)
  • S. Curtis et al.

    Is there a place for geography in the analysis of health inequality?

    Sociology of health and illness

    (1998)
  • J.K. Davies et al.

    Healthy Cities

    (1993)
  • N.K. Denzin et al.

    Handbook of Qualitative Research

    (1994)
  • Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (DETR), 2000. Our Towns & Cities: The urban white paper. DETR,...
  • C. Duncan et al.

    Psychiatric morbiditya multi-level approach to regional variations in the UK

    Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

    (1995)
  • H.L. Freeman

    Mental Health and the Environment

    (1984)
  • The Future for Queen's Crescent Library

    (1999)
  • H.J. Gans

    The Urban Villagers

    (1962)
  • C. Geertz

    The Interpretation of Cultures

    (1973)
  • B. Glaser et al.

    The Discovery of Grounded Theory

    (1967)
  • D. Goldberg et al.

    Common Mental Disorders

    (1992)
  • M. Hammersley

    Whats Wrong with Ethnography?

    (1992)
  • D. Harvey

    Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference

    (1996)
  • Cited by (22)

    • Estimating ecological social capital using multi-level regression with post-stratification: A spatial analysis of psychiatric admission rates in wales

      2019, Health and Place
      Citation Excerpt :

      The causal mechanisms underpinning this association are less clear. Explanations can be broadly divided into compositional and contextual accounts[e.g. (Whitley and Prince, 2005)]. Compositional accounts suggest that people predisposed to, or with existing, mental health problems move to particular types of area, causing a decline in social and economic capital (Sariaslan et al., 2015).

    • Recovery from severe mental illness in Québec: The role of culture and place

      2019, Health and Place
      Citation Excerpt :

      Hence, much recovery research has focused on the importance of secure and safe housing for people in recovery (e.g. Piat et al., 2012; Padgett, 2007; Henwood et al., 2011; Townley et al., 2009). Other research has examined the impact of neighborhood-level factors, such as safety and social capital, and how this can provide a ‘therapeutic landscape’ for recovery (Whitley and Prince, 2005; Slade et al., 2014; Duff, 2012; Gariepy et al., 2014). Indeed, Duff (2016) conducted ethnographic research examining recovery, noting that places can act as therapeutic landscapes through their ‘affective atmospheres’, which he describes as shared interstitial spaces that emerge in everyday encounters between bodies, objects and subjects.

    • Neighborhoods and mental health: Exploring ethnic density, poverty, and social cohesion among Asian Americans and Latinos

      2014, Social Science and Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Neighborhood social cohesion may also foster good mental health-promoting norms within neighborhoods and encourage desirable health behaviors, such as physical activity and a healthy diet (Kawachi and Berkman, 2000, 2001; Whitley and McKenzie, 2005). The theoretical importance of social cohesion is supported by an emerging literature that empirically examines its relationship to various mental health outcomes, including anxiety (Cutrona et al., 2000; McCulloch, 2001), depression (Cutrona et al., 2000; Mair et al., 2010a; McCulloch, 2001; Whitley and Prince, 2005), schizophrenia (Boydell et al., 2001), general mental health status (Drukker et al., 2003), and self-rated mental health (Mulvaney-Day et al., 2007; Ross, 2000; Zhang and Ta, 2009). To date, however, findings on the beneficial effects of neighborhood social cohesion remain inconclusive: Some studies suggest significant and positive effects of neighborhood social cohesion on mental health (Mair et al., 2010a,b; McCulloch, 2001; Ross, 2000); others reveal insignificant findings (Cutrona et al., 2000; Mulvaney-Day et al., 2007; Zhang and Ta, 2009).

    • Defying the odds: A mixed-methods study of health resilience in deprived areas of England

      2013, Social Science and Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Another study by Wiles et al. (2009) concluded that place attachment was a significant factor for increased wellbeing amongst older adults. There is a large literature on the importance of social capital for health with most studies finding a positive association across a range of health indicators including self-rated health (Kawachi, Kennedy, & Glass, 1999), mortality (Lochner, Kawachi, Brennan, & Buka, 2003) and mental health (Kawachi & Berkman, 2001; Whitley & Prince, 2005). Social capital is also considered to be a mediator of the area-level relationship between inequality and health (Cattell, 2001; Wilkinson, 1996, 1999).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text