Adolescent health briefAdolescents’ understanding of social class: a comparison of white upper middle class and working class youth
Section snippets
Methods
The study design and sample have been described in detail previously (8). Briefly, this is a cross-sectional study of a convenience sample of 48 working class and 50 upper middle class 16-year-old, academically achieving, white adolescents stratified by gender, recruited through flyers in local high schools and newspaper advertisements for participation in a psychological experiment on social class identification and its biobehavioral correlates. Assignment to either the upper middle class or
Subjective vs. objective social class identity and social class aspirations
Data on teens’ subjective social class identification and expected social class at parents’ age stratitfied by objective social position are presented in Table 1. Only 17% of working class youth subjectively identified as “working class,” compared with 74% of upper middle class subjects who correctly identify with their objective social class position (p < .0001). No upper middle class youth misclassified themselves as “working” or “upper class” and rarely expected to rise to a higher class as
Discussion
The working class adolescents in this study exhibited differences in self-identification of social class position, perceptions of how society operates relative to class, aspirations for their future, and expectations of achieving their aspirations relative to upper middle class youth. Though our society has gone through significant transitions in the past 10 to 20 years, including more women in the workplace and more single-parent families (15), these youth followed the pattern of social class
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank S. Jean Emans, M.D., for helpful comments on earlier drafts of this manuscript.
Funded in part by a grant from The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation to The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, and Project MCJ-MA 259195 and Order # 103HR960337P from the Maternal and Child Health Bureau (Title V, Social Security Act), Health Resources and Services Administration, DHHS.
References (15)
- et al.
Society and Health
(1995) Social determinants of healththe sociobiological translation
- et al.
The measurement of social class in epidemiology
Epidemiol Rev
(1988) - et al.
Socioeconomic factors and cardiovascular diseasea review of the literature
Circulation
(1993) The Psychology of Social ClassesA Study of Class Consciousness
(1949)- Centers R. Social class identifications of American youth....
- et al.
Functions of children’s perceptions of the stratification system
Am Sociol Rev
(1971)
Cited by (39)
Beyond parental wealth: Grandparental wealth and the transition to adulthood
2024, Research in Social Stratification and Mobility“It's about having money, but also happiness:” A qualitative investigation of how adolescents understand subjective status in themselves and others
2018, Journal of AdolescenceCitation Excerpt :In particular, adolescents' use of both traditional and non-traditional status markers, and the justification that adolescents provided for their own scale placement will be discussed in more detail below. Following from previous research suggesting that adolescents associate money with status starting in childhood (Goodman et al., 2000; Rauscher et al., 2017), almost all of the adolescents in the current study indicated that money and other traditional markers of SES (e.g., material goods, education, and occupational prestige) were reflective of higher status for both themselves and others. While adolescents often acknowledged the centrality of wealth and traditional assessments of SES, a subset of adolescents explicitly stated that they rejected status as understood in this way, in line with previous work suggesting that adolescents often endorse the importance of a more economically equal society (e.g., Arsenio & Willems, 2017).
Children's perceptions of social resource inequality
2017, Journal of Applied Developmental PsychologyCitation Excerpt :Notably, the existing literature suggests that knowledge about the economic underpinnings of resource inequality between groups is slow to develop. For example, with few exceptions (Chafel & Neitzel, 2005; Hussak & Cimpian, 2015), studies have shown that children do not spontaneously consider how social factors (e.g., insufficient educational or job opportunities) contribute to differences in individuals' economic status until 12–18 years of age (Arsenio, Preziosi, Silberstein, & Hamburger, 2013; Flanagan et al., 2014; Goodman et al., 2000; Mistry, Brown, Chow, & Collins, 2012). Younger children have also been shown to perceive certain group-based resource inequalities to be deserved, and to assume that the way things are is the way that they are supposed to be (McGillicuddy-De Lisi, Daly, & Neal, 2006; Olson, Dweck, Spelke, & Banaji, 2011).
Asset ownership and health and mental health functioning among AIDS-orphaned adolescents: Findings from a randomized clinical trial in rural Uganda
2009, Social Science and MedicineCitation Excerpt :Future studies may benefit from a relatively longer follow-up period, with more data points. Third, while family income and educational attainment of parents are key measures of socioeconomic status—and hence frequently used in explaining the well-being of children—the survey did not include items on family income due to the difficulty in obtaining reliable and accurate data on this item when children are the respondents (Currie, Elton, Todd, & Platt, 1997; Goodman et al., 2000). In regards to parents' educational attainment, the study did collect this information but this particular item had too many observations reported as “I don't know” for meaningful analysis (28% of mother's education and 57% of father's education were reported as “I don't know”).
Objective and subjective social class gradients for substance use among Mexican adolescents
2009, Social Science and MedicineCitation Excerpt :The social gradient in adolescent health has largely been explored using objective indicators of the socioeconomic components of parents' social class, such as income, education, or occupation, which serve as proxy measures of access to goods and services. Several recent studies have also investigated adolescents' perceptions of their relative subjective social status (SSS)—using scales modeled after those used in adults—and found the ladders to be valuable in explaining adolescents' health status even after taking into account objective indicators of parental social class (Glendinning, Love, Hendry, & Shucksmith, 1992; Goodman et al., 2001; Goodman et al., 2000). Similar to the measurements for SSS in adults, the youth-specific indicators involve two “ladders:” one representing broader society, and the other representing one's immediate community; adolescents are asked to rank themselves on these ladders.
Subjective social status and neural processing of race in Mexican American adolescents
2018, Development and Psychopathology