Analysing changes of health inequalities in the Nordic welfare states

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00191-5Get rights and content

Abstract

This study examined changes over time in relative health inequalities among men and women in four Nordic countries, Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden. A serious economic recession burst out in the early 1990s particularly in Finland and Sweden. We ask whether this adverse social structural development influenced health inequalities by employment status and educational attainment, i.e. whether the trends in health inequalities were similar or dissimilar between the Nordic countries. The data derived from comparable interview surveys carried out in 1986/87 and 1994/95 in the four countries. Limiting long-standing illness and perceived health were analysed by age, gender, employment status and educational attainment. First, age-adjusted overall prevalence percentages were calculated. Second, changes in the magnitude of relative health inequalities were studied using logistic regression analysis. Within each country the prevalence of ill-health remained at a similar level, with Finns having the poorest health. Analysing all countries together health inequalities by employment status and education showed no major changes. There were slightly different tendencies among men and women in inequalities by both health indicators, although these did not reach statistical significance. Among men there was a suggestion of narrowing health inequalities, whereas among women such a suggestion could not be discerned. Looking at particular countries some small changes in men's as well as women's health inequalities could be found. Over a period of deep economic recession and a large increase in unemployment, particularly in Finland and Sweden, health inequalities by employment status and education remained broadly unchanged in all Nordic countries. Thus, during this fairly short period health inequalities in these countries were not strongly influenced by changes in other structural inequalities, in particular labour market inequalities. Institutional arrangements in the Nordic welfare states, including social benefits and services, were cut during the recession but nevertheless broadly remained, and are likely to have buffered against the structural pressures towards widening health inequalities.

Introduction

Socioeconomic inequalities in ill-health at one point of time have often been studied, but their changes over time have only seldom been under scrutiny (see e.g. Karisto, 1993; Elstad, 1996a; Lundberg, 1992). There are cross-sectional studies which have compared health inequalities in a number of countries (e.g. Mackenbach, Kunst, Cavelaars, Groenhof, Geurts, & the EU Working Group on Socioeconomic Inequalities in Health, 1997; Cavelaars et al., 1998; Lahelma, Manderbacka, Rahkonen, & Sihvonen, 1993; Lahelma & Arber, 1994), but we lack studies which have compared changes over time in two or more countries, i.e. looked whether health inequalities have changed in a similar or dissimilar way in different countries.

International comparisons are complicated for practical reasons, such as lack of comparable data, but also methodological reasons make such studies precarious. Countries which vary a lot with regard to social structure and culture do not easily allow focussed comparisons (Allardt, 1975). This study examines the Nordic countries, which share many similarities, and from which comparable data are available. Some previous cross-sectional Nordic comparisons have assessed socioeconomic inequalities in ill-health in the 1970s and 1980s (Karisto, Notkola, & Valkonen, 1978; Lahelma et al., 1993). However, no previous study has compared trends in health inequalities in the Nordic countries. Therefore, this study focussed on changes over time in inequalities in ill-health by employment status and educational attainment in four Nordic countries, that is Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden, from the mid-1980s to the mid-1990s.

Section snippets

The Nordic countries from the 1980s to the 1990s

From a broader international perspective the Nordic countries are often seen as a set of fairly similar countries in terms of history, geopolitical location, language and culture, economy and social structure. Referring to such similarities it is even customary to speak about a ‘Scandinavian’ or a ‘Nordic Model’ of welfare state (Erikson, Hansen, Ringen, & Uusitalo, 1987). In Esping-Andersen's (1990), Esping-Andersen's (1999) welfare state regime analysis the Nordic countries are grouped into a

Health inequalities in the Nordic countries

The above analyses of the welfare trends in the Nordic countries did not include health. In fact, we lack up-to-date Nordic comparisons of changes in health inequalities over time. According to European cross-sectional comparisons, describing the 1980s’ situation, substantial health inequalities can be found among Nordic men and women across various health and socioeconomic indicators (Mackenbach et al., 1997; Cavelaars et al., 1998; Lundberg and Lahelma 2001). Relative inequalities in

Aims of the study

The purpose of this study is to contribute to the evidence on health inequalities by an international comparison of changes over time. This is done in a set of relatively similar Nordic welfare states, that is Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden, in 1986/87 and 1994/95. Data sets and harmonised variables as similar as possible are used to be able to compare changes in the pattern and magnitude of health inequalities among men and women in these four countries. Comparisons of health inequalities

Nordic data bank

A key issue in this Nordic comparison over time is similar data sources. Broad representative Surveys on Living Conditions have been collected by the statistical authorities in Finland, Norway and Sweden to allow an examination of various subareas of welfare, including health. These surveys have been jointly planned and coordinated to be comparable across countries and over time. The data for our study derive from the Surveys on Living Conditions collected in Finland in 1986 and 1994, in Norway

Prevalence of ill-health in 1986/87 and 1994/95

There were differences between countries in the overall prevalence levels of limiting long-standing illness and perceived health. The prevalence of limiting long-standing illness was highest among Finnish men and women and lowest among Swedish men and women, while Norwegian and Danish (data only for 1994) men and women fell in-between. For perceived health the Finns had even more clearly the highest prevalence while Danish and Swedish men and women had equally low prevalence of perceived health

Limiting long-standing illness

A key interest of this study was in changes in health inequalities by employment status, because the main structural change from the 1980s to the 1990s in the Nordic countries was an increase in unemployment. The first analysis included men from three countries, Finland, Norway and Sweden. Taken these countries together no major changes in employment status inequalities in limiting long-standing illness could be found (Table 4(a)). This is indicated by the statistically non-significant age

Limiting long-standing illness

Analyses were continued by examining inequalities in limiting long-standing illness and perceived health by educational attainment. Thus, it was possible to control whether socioeconomic inequalities by educational attainment, which is not directly determined by the labour market situation, have changed in a similar or dissimilar way among Nordic men and women. Among men there were no major changes of inequalities in limiting long-standing illness by education, when Finland, Norway and Sweden

Discussion

We studied changes over time in health inequalities by employment status and educational attainment among men and women in four Nordic welfare states, that is Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden. The early 1990s saw a deep and sudden labour market crisis and a large increase in unemployment in Finland and somewhat less so in Sweden. Denmark had experienced corresponding economic difficulties already a decade earlier. The scale of the labour market changes in Norway was more moderate than that

Conclusion

It is likely that there are different reasons, first, for the existence of a pattern and magnitude of health inequalities per se, second, for the changes over time in the pattern and magnitude of health inequalities and, third, for the variation between countries over time in the pattern and magnitude of health inequalities. Diverse factors, such as past and present living conditions, health behaviours, labour market as well as broader welfare state arrangements, are all likely to contribute to

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the national statistical authorities from Finland, Norway and Sweden for permission to collate data from national Surveys on Living Conditions from each country into a Nordic data bank allowing this joint comparative research. The Danish National Institute of Public Health is acknowledged for providing data from the Health and Morbidity Survey for the data bank. Grants from the Joint Committee of the Nordic Social Science Research Councils (NOS-S), and the Academy of Finland,

References (65)

  • J Vahtera et al.

    Effect of organisational downsizing on health of employees

    Lancet

    (1997)
  • M Alestalo et al.

    ScandinaviaWelfare states in the periphery—peripheral welfare states?

  • E Allardt

    Att ha, attälska, att vara. Om välfärden i Norden (Having, loving and being. Welfare in the Nordic countries)

    (1975)
  • M Bartley et al.

    Relation between socioeconomic status, employment and health during economic change, 1973–93

    British Medical Journal

    (1996)
  • D Blane et al.

    The measurement of morbidity in relation to social class

  • M Blaxter

    A comparison of measures of inequality in morbidity

  • A.D De Bruin et al.

    Health interview surveys. Towards international harmonisation of methods and instruments

    (1996)
  • B Burström et al.

    Inequality in the social consequences of illnessHow well do people with long-term illness fare in the British and Swedish labour markets?

    International Journal of Health Services

    (2000)
  • C Cavelaars et al.

    Inequalities in self-reported health by educational levelA comparison of 11 Western European countries

    Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

    (1998)
  • W Cockerham

    The social determinants of the decline of the life expectancy in Russia and eastern EuropeA lifestyle explanation

    Journal of Health and Social Behaviour

    (1997)
  • E Dahl et al.

    Sysselsettning, klasse og helse 1980–1995. En analyse av fem norske levekårsundersø-kelser (Employment status class and health 1980–1995. An analysis of five Norwegian surveys on living conditions)

    Tidskrift for samfunnsforskning

    (1999)
  • G Davey Smith et al.

    Explanations for socio-economic differentials in mortality

    European Journal of Public Health

    (1994)
  • DIKE (1996). Social ulighed, sundhed og sygdom—illustration af sammenhænge (Social inequality, health and...
  • J.I Elstad

    How large are the differences—really? Self-reported long-standing illness among working class and middle class men

    Sociology of Health and Illness

    (1996)
  • Erikson, R., Hansen, E. J., Ringen, S., & Uusitalo, H. (Eds). (1987). The Scandinavian model. Welfare states and...
  • R Erikson et al.

    The Scandinavian approach to welfare research

  • G Esping-Andersen

    Three worlds of welfare capitalism

    (1990)
  • G Esping-Andersen

    Social foundations of post-industrial economies

    (1999)
  • S.E Fienberg

    The analysis of cross-classified categorical data

    (1980)
  • J Fritzell

    Still different Income distribution in the Nordic countries in a European comparison

  • J Fritzell et al.

    Välfärdsförändringar 1968–1991 (Changes in welfare)

  • B Halleröd et al.

    Poverty and social exclusion in the Nordic countries

  • Cited by (0)

    This paper has been prepared within a joint Nordic project on Social variations in health: Nordic comparisons and changes over time, coordinated at the Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki. The study design has been jointly planned and discussed at three workshops. Analyses have been made and drafts written by EL, KK, ER and TT. The other project members, listed alphabetically, have provided national survey data to the coordinating centre, contributed to the final analyses and their interpretation, as well as to the writing of the drafts.

    View full text