Analysing changes of health inequalities in the Nordic welfare states☆
Introduction
Socioeconomic inequalities in ill-health at one point of time have often been studied, but their changes over time have only seldom been under scrutiny (see e.g. Karisto, 1993; Elstad, 1996a; Lundberg, 1992). There are cross-sectional studies which have compared health inequalities in a number of countries (e.g. Mackenbach, Kunst, Cavelaars, Groenhof, Geurts, & the EU Working Group on Socioeconomic Inequalities in Health, 1997; Cavelaars et al., 1998; Lahelma, Manderbacka, Rahkonen, & Sihvonen, 1993; Lahelma & Arber, 1994), but we lack studies which have compared changes over time in two or more countries, i.e. looked whether health inequalities have changed in a similar or dissimilar way in different countries.
International comparisons are complicated for practical reasons, such as lack of comparable data, but also methodological reasons make such studies precarious. Countries which vary a lot with regard to social structure and culture do not easily allow focussed comparisons (Allardt, 1975). This study examines the Nordic countries, which share many similarities, and from which comparable data are available. Some previous cross-sectional Nordic comparisons have assessed socioeconomic inequalities in ill-health in the 1970s and 1980s (Karisto, Notkola, & Valkonen, 1978; Lahelma et al., 1993). However, no previous study has compared trends in health inequalities in the Nordic countries. Therefore, this study focussed on changes over time in inequalities in ill-health by employment status and educational attainment in four Nordic countries, that is Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden, from the mid-1980s to the mid-1990s.
Section snippets
The Nordic countries from the 1980s to the 1990s
From a broader international perspective the Nordic countries are often seen as a set of fairly similar countries in terms of history, geopolitical location, language and culture, economy and social structure. Referring to such similarities it is even customary to speak about a ‘Scandinavian’ or a ‘Nordic Model’ of welfare state (Erikson, Hansen, Ringen, & Uusitalo, 1987). In Esping-Andersen's (1990), Esping-Andersen's (1999) welfare state regime analysis the Nordic countries are grouped into a
Health inequalities in the Nordic countries
The above analyses of the welfare trends in the Nordic countries did not include health. In fact, we lack up-to-date Nordic comparisons of changes in health inequalities over time. According to European cross-sectional comparisons, describing the 1980s’ situation, substantial health inequalities can be found among Nordic men and women across various health and socioeconomic indicators (Mackenbach et al., 1997; Cavelaars et al., 1998; Lundberg and Lahelma 2001). Relative inequalities in
Aims of the study
The purpose of this study is to contribute to the evidence on health inequalities by an international comparison of changes over time. This is done in a set of relatively similar Nordic welfare states, that is Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden, in 1986/87 and 1994/95. Data sets and harmonised variables as similar as possible are used to be able to compare changes in the pattern and magnitude of health inequalities among men and women in these four countries. Comparisons of health inequalities
Nordic data bank
A key issue in this Nordic comparison over time is similar data sources. Broad representative Surveys on Living Conditions have been collected by the statistical authorities in Finland, Norway and Sweden to allow an examination of various subareas of welfare, including health. These surveys have been jointly planned and coordinated to be comparable across countries and over time. The data for our study derive from the Surveys on Living Conditions collected in Finland in 1986 and 1994, in Norway
Prevalence of ill-health in 1986/87 and 1994/95
There were differences between countries in the overall prevalence levels of limiting long-standing illness and perceived health. The prevalence of limiting long-standing illness was highest among Finnish men and women and lowest among Swedish men and women, while Norwegian and Danish (data only for 1994) men and women fell in-between. For perceived health the Finns had even more clearly the highest prevalence while Danish and Swedish men and women had equally low prevalence of perceived health
Limiting long-standing illness
A key interest of this study was in changes in health inequalities by employment status, because the main structural change from the 1980s to the 1990s in the Nordic countries was an increase in unemployment. The first analysis included men from three countries, Finland, Norway and Sweden. Taken these countries together no major changes in employment status inequalities in limiting long-standing illness could be found (Table 4(a)). This is indicated by the statistically non-significant age
Limiting long-standing illness
Analyses were continued by examining inequalities in limiting long-standing illness and perceived health by educational attainment. Thus, it was possible to control whether socioeconomic inequalities by educational attainment, which is not directly determined by the labour market situation, have changed in a similar or dissimilar way among Nordic men and women. Among men there were no major changes of inequalities in limiting long-standing illness by education, when Finland, Norway and Sweden
Discussion
We studied changes over time in health inequalities by employment status and educational attainment among men and women in four Nordic welfare states, that is Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden. The early 1990s saw a deep and sudden labour market crisis and a large increase in unemployment in Finland and somewhat less so in Sweden. Denmark had experienced corresponding economic difficulties already a decade earlier. The scale of the labour market changes in Norway was more moderate than that
Conclusion
It is likely that there are different reasons, first, for the existence of a pattern and magnitude of health inequalities per se, second, for the changes over time in the pattern and magnitude of health inequalities and, third, for the variation between countries over time in the pattern and magnitude of health inequalities. Diverse factors, such as past and present living conditions, health behaviours, labour market as well as broader welfare state arrangements, are all likely to contribute to
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the national statistical authorities from Finland, Norway and Sweden for permission to collate data from national Surveys on Living Conditions from each country into a Nordic data bank allowing this joint comparative research. The Danish National Institute of Public Health is acknowledged for providing data from the Health and Morbidity Survey for the data bank. Grants from the Joint Committee of the Nordic Social Science Research Councils (NOS-S), and the Academy of Finland,
References (65)
- et al.
Socio-economic factors, perceived control and self-reported health in Russia
Social Science & Medicine
(1998) - et al.
Socioeconomic factors, material inequalities, and perceived control in self-rated healthCross-sectional data form seven post-communist countries
Social Science & Medicine
(2000) Health life styles in Russia
Social Science & Medicine
(2000)Inequalities in health related to womens marital, parental, and employment status—a comparison between the early 1970s and the late 1980s, Norway
Social Science & Medicine
(1996)- et al.
Changes in the social patterning of health? The case of Finland
Social Science & Medicine
(1997) Income inequality and healthExpanding the debate
Social Science & Medicine
(2000)- et al.
Do women over-report morbidity? Mens and womens responses to structured prompting on a standard question about chronic illness
Social Science & Medicine
(1999) - et al.
Reliability of perceived health by sex and age
Social Science & Medicine
(1999) - et al.
Excess mortality of unemployed men and women during a period of rapidly increasing unemployment
Lancet
(1996) - et al.
An empirical analysis of the dimensions of health status measures
Social Science & Medicine
(1989)
Effect of organisational downsizing on health of employees
Lancet
ScandinaviaWelfare states in the periphery—peripheral welfare states?
Att ha, attälska, att vara. Om välfärden i Norden (Having, loving and being. Welfare in the Nordic countries)
Relation between socioeconomic status, employment and health during economic change, 1973–93
British Medical Journal
The measurement of morbidity in relation to social class
A comparison of measures of inequality in morbidity
Health interview surveys. Towards international harmonisation of methods and instruments
Inequality in the social consequences of illnessHow well do people with long-term illness fare in the British and Swedish labour markets?
International Journal of Health Services
Inequalities in self-reported health by educational levelA comparison of 11 Western European countries
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
The social determinants of the decline of the life expectancy in Russia and eastern EuropeA lifestyle explanation
Journal of Health and Social Behaviour
Sysselsettning, klasse og helse 1980–1995. En analyse av fem norske levekårsundersø-kelser (Employment status class and health 1980–1995. An analysis of five Norwegian surveys on living conditions)
Tidskrift for samfunnsforskning
Explanations for socio-economic differentials in mortality
European Journal of Public Health
How large are the differences—really? Self-reported long-standing illness among working class and middle class men
Sociology of Health and Illness
The Scandinavian approach to welfare research
Three worlds of welfare capitalism
Social foundations of post-industrial economies
The analysis of cross-classified categorical data
Still different Income distribution in the Nordic countries in a European comparison
Välfärdsförändringar 1968–1991 (Changes in welfare)
Poverty and social exclusion in the Nordic countries
Cited by (0)
- ☆
This paper has been prepared within a joint Nordic project on Social variations in health: Nordic comparisons and changes over time, coordinated at the Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki. The study design has been jointly planned and discussed at three workshops. Analyses have been made and drafts written by EL, KK, ER and TT. The other project members, listed alphabetically, have provided national survey data to the coordinating centre, contributed to the final analyses and their interpretation, as well as to the writing of the drafts.