The factor structure of Antonovsky's sense of coherence scale in swedish clinical and nonclinical samples

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(97)00225-0Get rights and content

Abstract

Confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses of Antonovsky's Sense of Coherence Scale (SOCS) were run on two clinical and two non-clinical Swedish samples (N = 915). Confirmatory factor analyses did not support the hypothesis of a single common factor measured by all SOCS items, nor the three SOC components posited by Antonovsky. Exploratory factor analysis structures were similar enough across samples to propose the existence of three more or less stable factors. Although simple structure was not obtained, the first two factors were basically equivalent to Antonovsky's meaningfulness and comprehensibility components, respectively. On the basis of the high-loading items meaningfulness was interpreted as a zest—depression dimension and comprehensibility as intolerance vs tolerance for emotional conflict. The third factor was only distantly related to manageability, with the items involved all reflecting interpersonal trust and mistrust. The validity of these interpretations was supported by differential correlations between these factors and the Depression, Anxiety and Paranoia subscales of SCL-90.

References (24)

  • L.R. Derogatis et al.

    The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL): A self-report symptom inventory

    Behavioral Science

    (1974)
  • B. Dudek et al.

    Psychometric characteristics of the Orientation to Life Questionnaire for measuring the sense of coherence

    Polish Psychological Bulletin

    (1993)
  • Cited by (44)

    • Comparing sense of coherence, depressive symptoms and anxiety, and their relationships with health in a population-based study

      2008, Social Science and Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      In addition, two manageability items and one comprehensibility item (numbered 2, 3 and 5, see Fig. 1) were more likely to measure interpersonal trust/mistrust than the manageability or comprehensibility dimensions of SOC. In previous factor-analytic studies, these items have formed their own factor, which has been interpreted as reflecting interpersonal trust or mistrust (e.g., Sandell et al., 1998). Factor analyses conducted on the present data also indicated that the structure of the SOC scale was rather ambiguous.

    • Sense of coherence among delusional patients: prediction of remission and risk of relapse

      2008, Comprehensive Psychiatry
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, other findings of the study suggest a more complex relationship between the variables. Some of these involve studying the differential effects of the separate components of the SOC, which should be cautiously viewed as exploratory, due to equivocal data regarding independence of these components from the concept of a single SOC factor [9,10]. Sense of coherence among acutely delusional participants was found to be similar to that found in the population at large, contradicting the “common-sense” assumption of reduction in SOC in psychotic states [13].

    • The Sense of Coherence: Measurement Issues

      2022, The Handbook of Salutogenesis: Second Edition
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text