Elsevier

The Lancet

Volume 352, Issue 9128, 22 August 1998, Pages 597-600
The Lancet

Articles
International multicentre pooled analysis of late postnatal mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1 infection

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(98)01419-6Get rights and content

Summary

Background

An understanding of the risk and timing of mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1 in the postnatal period is important for the development of public-health strategies. We aimed to estimate the rate and timing of late postnatal transmission of HIV-1.

Methods

We did an international multicentre pooled analysis of individual data from prospective cohort studies of children followed-up from birth born to HIV-1-infected mothers. We enrolled all uninfected children confirmed by HIV-1-DNA PCR, HIV-1 serology, or both. Late postnatal transmission was taken to have occurred if a child later became infected. We calculated duration of follow-up for non-infected children from the time of negative diagnosis to the date of the last laboratory follow-up, or for infected children to the mid-point between the date of last negative and first positive results. We stratified the analysis for breastfeeding.

Findings

Less than 5% of the 2807 children in four studies from industrialised countries (USA, Switzerland, France, and Europe) were breastfed and no HIV-1 infection was diagnosed. By contrast, late postnatal transmission occurred in 49 (5%) of 902 children in four cohorts from developing countries, in which breastfeeding was the norm (Rwanda [Butare and Kigali], Ivory Coast, Kenya), with an overall estimated risk of 3·2 per 100 child-years of breastfeeding follow-up (95% CI 3·1–3·8), with similar estimates in individual studies (p=0·10). Exact information on timing of infection and duration of breastfeeding was available for 20 of the 49 children with late postnatal transmission. We took transmission to have occurred midway between last negative and first positive HIV-1 tests. If breastfeeding had stopped at age 4 months transmission would have occurred in no infants, and in three if it had stopped at 6 months.

Interpretation

Risk of late postnatal transmission is consistently shown to be substantial for breastfed children born to HIV-1-positive mothers. This risk should be balanced against the effect of early weaning on infant mortality and morbidity and maternal fertility.

Introduction

Mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1 infection can occur during pregnancy in the intrapartum period or postnatally.1 HIV-1 DNA is present in breastmilk2 and postnatal transmission can occur through breastfeeding.3, 4 Breastfed children have a higher risk of mother-to-child transmission than those who have never been breastfed,5 and prospective follow-up of children born to HIV-1-infected mothers has shown that some infants become infected postnatally after loss of maternal antibodies.6, 7

Avoidance of breastfeeding by HIV-1-infected women is recommended if safe and affordable alternatives are available,8 a practice reinforced by WHO, UNICEF, and UNAIDS (UNAIDS website [HIV and infant feeding http://coww.unaids.org/unaids/document/epidemic/infant.html] accessed on July 28, 1998). In many developing countries, however, high expense and rates of infant morbidity and mortality are associated with alternative feeding methods and identification of HIV-1-infected pregnant women. In places where the prevalence of HIV-1 is high, postnatal acquisition of HIV-1 infection through breastfeeding remains a concern and a possible compromise would be to stop breastfeeding early.8, 9, 10

Although breastfeeding has been estimated to double the risk of vertical transmission,4 the exact risk and timing of transmission attributable to breastfeeding remain unclear. A randomised controlled trial of breastfeeding compared with bottle feeding is underway in Nairobi, Kenya,2 which should provide a reliable estimate of the additional risk of HIV-1 transmission attributable to breastfeeding. The postnatal transmission risk of HIV-1 can also be assessed in large prospective studies with frequent laboratory followup of children born to HIV-1-infected mothers, in which postnatal transmission can be distinguished from intrapartum transmission.11 In such studies, late seroconversions in breastfed children have been reported,6, 7, 12, 13, 14, 15 but the reliability of risk estimates needs to be improved.

Improved understanding of the risk and timing of postnatal transmission of HIV-1 is important for the development of strategies for infant-feeding and weaning policies.9, 16 Such understanding is especially relevant to interventions to decrease vertical transmission that are currently being developed and assessed.17, 18 We did an international multicentre pooled analysis to estimate the rate and timing of late postnatal transmission of HIV-1.

Section snippets

Methods

We gathered all published and unpublished data from completed or continuing cohort studies, in which information was available on sequential prospective laboratory follow-up (PCR, ELISA, and western blot) of children born to mothers known to be infected with HIV-1 before or at delivery. To limit the publication bias inherent to pooled analysis,19 we contacted all potential investigators through the International Working Group on Mother-To-Child Transmission of HIV-1, a large network of

Results

By October, 1997, we had gathered individual data from six cohort studies, and summary data from two other studies, including 5997 children (Table 17, 12, 14, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28). In the four cohorts from industrialised countries, 5% or less of children were ever breastfed, and laboratory follow-up included HIV-1 serology, DNA PCR, and viral culture every 3 months after birth. In the four developing-country cohorts, breastfeeding was the norm and, with the exception of Butare where only

Discussion

The previously reported risks of late postnatal transmission of HIV-1 infection were based on small numbers and ranged from 5% to 12%,11, 14 or a yearly incidence of 5·8 per 100 child-years of breastfeeding.12 A study in Nairobi, Kenya, reported 40 cases of acquisition of infection though breastfeeding in children of mothers with either prevalent or incident HIV-1 infection.24 We attempted to overcome difficulties of differences in definition of late postnatal transmission, laboratory methods

References (33)

  • HIV and infant feeding: an interim statement

    Wkly Epidemiol Rec

    (1996)
  • HIV/AIDS: the global epidemic

    Wkly Epidemiol Rec

    (1997)
  • A Simonon et al.

    An assessment of the timing of mother-to-child transmission of HIV type-1 by means of polymerase chain reaction

    J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr

    (1994)
  • M Bulterys et al.

    HIV-1 seroconversion after 20 months of age in a cohort of breastfed children born to HIV-1-infected women in Rwanda

    AIDS

    (1995)
  • J Bertolli et al.

    Estimating the timing of mother-to-child transmission of human immunodeficiency virus in a breast-feeding population in Kinshasa, Zaire

    J Infect Dis

    (1996)
  • ER Epkini et al.

    Late postnatal mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1 in Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire

    Lancet

    (1997)
  • Cited by (211)

    • HIV in pregnancy: Mother-to-child transmission, pharmacotherapy, and toxicity

      2021, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Molecular Basis of Disease
    • A threshold delay model of HIV infection of newborn infants through breastfeeding

      2019, Infectious Disease Modelling
      Citation Excerpt :

      This represents a first step towards the development of general immuno-epidemiological model frameworks of HIV exposure through breastfeeding and HIV persistence at the population level. There is strong evidence that the longer the duration of breastfeeding, the greater the risk of HIV transmission, i.e. the risk is cumulative (see Leroy et al. (1998); Miotti et al. (1999); Breastfeeding and HIV International Transmission Study Group et al. (2004)) with the cumulative risk of transmission through breastfeeding being 10–14% for infants aged 4–6 weeks and 22% for infants aged 18–24 months (Leroy et al. (2002); Nduati et al. (2000); The Petra study team (2002)). Several research teams have successfully designed experiments which confirm this hypothesis (see, for example, Hessell et al. (2009); Kersh et al. (2009); Van Rompay et al. (2005)).

    • HIV Prevention and Treatment in Children and Adolescents

      2016, International Encyclopedia of Public Health
    • Breastfeeding: Health benefits for child and mother

      2013, Archives de Pediatrie
      Citation Excerpt :

      Il devra bénéficier d’une nouvelle injection de vaccin à 1 mois et 6 mois (ou à 1, 2, et 12 mois). Le portage maternel du virus de l’hépatite C n’est pas une contreindication à l’allaitement, à moins d’une hépatite chronique évolutive [1,57]. La situation est radicalement différente pour le virus de l’immunodéficience humaine (VIH) et cette infection maternelle contre-indique formellement l’allaitement dans les pays industrialisés [58].

    • Human Immunodeficiency Virus/Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome in the Infant

      2011, Infectious Diseases of the Fetus and Newborn Infant
    • APOBEC3 proteins expressed in mammary epithelial cells are packaged into retroviruses and can restrict transmission of milk-borne virions

      2010, Cell Host and Microbe
      Citation Excerpt :

      The most potent inhibitors of HIV infection, APOBEC3G and -3F, are highly expressed in HIV-target lymphoid cells, while APOBEC3A, -3B, and -3H, also expressed in keratinocytes and skin, could play a role in restricting human papilloma virus infection (Vartanian et al., 2008). In contrast to MMTV, it is unclear whether milk-borne transmission of lentiviruses and delta viruses is cell-free or cell associated and whether lymphoid or mammary cells or both are the virus reservoir (Becquart et al., 2002; Bobat et al., 1997; Henderson et al., 2004; Hino et al., 1994; Koulinska et al., 2006; Lawrence and Lawrence, 2004; Leroy et al., 1998; Lewis et al., 1998; Li et al., 2004; Miotti et al., 1999; Pandrea et al., 2008; Rousseau et al., 2003, 2004; Rychert et al., 2006; Ziegler et al., 1985). Cultured human MECs can be productively infected with HTLVI (LeVasseur et al., 1998), and several studies have shown that human MECs express low levels of CXCR4 and can be infected by CXCR4-tropic HIV-1; at least in tissue culture cells, these cells produce infectious virus (El Messaoudi et al., 2000; Moriuchi and Moriuchi, 2004; Su et al., 2004; Toniolo et al., 1995).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text