Elsevier

The Lancet

Volume 345, Issue 8953, 1 April 1995, Pages 840-842
The Lancet

Viewpoint
Grey zones of clinical practice: some limits to evidence-based medicine

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(95)92969-XGet rights and content

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (22)

  • Kl Kahn et al.

    The effect of comorbidity on appropriateness ratings for two gastrointestinal procedures

    J Clin Epidemiol

    (1988)
  • Rh Brook et al.

    Diagnosis and tretment of coronary artery disease: comparison of doctors' attitudes in the USA and the UK

    Lancet

    (1988)
  • Sj Tanenbaum

    What physicians know

    N Engl J Med

    (1993)
  • Rh Brook et al.

    A method for the detailed assessment of the appropriateness of medical technologies

    Int J Tech Asses Health Care

    (1986)
  • Re Park et al.

    Physician ratings of appropriate indications for three procedures: theoretical indications vs indications used in practice

    Am J Publ Health

    (1989)
  • Ll Leape et al.

    Group judgments of appropriateness: the effect of panel composition

    Qual Assur Health Care

    (1992)
  • Gm Fraser et al.

    Indications for cholecystectomy; the results of a consensus panel approach

    Qual Assur Health Care

    (1993)
  • E. Scott et al.

    When does consensus exist in expert panels?

    J Publ Health Med

    (1991)
  • Ce Phelps

    The methodologic foundations of studies of the appropriateness of medicl care

    N Engl J Med

    (1993)
  • J. Lomas et al.

    The role of evidence in the consensus process

    JAMA

    (1988)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

View full text