Original ArticlesThe appropriateness of recommendations for hysterectomy12☆,
Section snippets
Methods
We measured appropriateness of recommendations for hysterectomy using two sets of criteria: 1) a set developed for the Women’s Health and Hysterectomy Project by an expert panel using the RAND/University of Southern California–Los Angeles appropriateness method, and 2) three recent ACOG criteria sets designed “to evaluate the appropriateness of hysterectomy.”6
The RAND appropriateness method has been well described.1, 2, 7 For this study, we reviewed the literature on hysterectomy to examine its
Results
Patients had a mean age of 46 years and a median of two children (Table 1). Two thirds were white, 14% were Hispanic, and 13% were black. More than half the women had household incomes between $31,000 and $75,000 per year. One third had prior tubal sterilization. The study physicians did 375 hysterectomies abdominally (75%), 107 vaginally (22%), and 15 vaginally with laparoscopic assistance (3%). Of the 97 physicians in the study, 30 did one of the hysterectomies, 22 did two or three, and 17
Discussion
We found that the care leading recommendations of hysterectomies in our cohort was suboptimal. Seventy percent of those cases did not meet standards of expert panel recommendations. In addition, 76% of women with conditions covered by ACOG criteria sets would have been referred for peer review because their care did not meet ACOG criteria.
Our finding that many diagnostic steps are not done before hysterectomy is not unique. In the Maine Women’s Health Study, fewer than half of women with
References (25)
- et al.
Complications of abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy among women of reproductive age in the United States. The Collaborative Review of Sterilization
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(1982) - et al.
Variation in hysterectomy rates across small geographic areas of Massachusetts
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(1993) - et al.
Comparison of the appropriateness of coronary angiography and coronary artery bypass graft surgery between Canada and New York State
JAMA
(1994) - et al.
The appropriateness of use of cardiovascular procedures in women and men
Arch Intern Med
(1994) - et al.
1994 SummaryNational hospital discharge survey. Advance data from vital and health statistics No. 278
(1996) - et al.
The appropriateness of hysterectomyA comparison of care in seven health plans
JAMA
(1993) - et al.
Hysterectomy for chronic pain. ACOG Criteria Set 29
(1997)The RAND/UCLA appropriateness method. Pub. no. AHCPR 95-0009
(1994)- et al.
HysterectomyA review of the literature on indications, effectiveness, and risks. Pub. no. MR-592/2-AHCPR
(1998)
HysterectomyRatings of appropriateness. Pub. no. MR-592/3-AHCPR
HysterectomyClinical recommendations and indications for use. Pub. no. MR 592/1 AHCPR
Cited by (164)
The relationship between heavy menstrual bleeding, iron deficiency, and iron deficiency anemia
2023, American Journal of Obstetrics and GynecologyIncorporation of randomized controlled trials into organizational guidelines for obstetricians and gynecologists
2022, European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology: XComplications following hysterectomy in women with intellectual and developmental disabilities
2022, Disability and Health JournalThe Influence of Health Insurance Policy on Radiation Oncology Physician SBRT/SABR Use Practices: A North American Survey
2017, International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology PhysicsAlternative Treatment Utilization Before Hysterectomy for Benign Gynecologic Conditions at a Large Integrated Health System
2019, Journal of Minimally Invasive GynecologyCitation Excerpt :In addition, the patients with symptomatic myomas as an indication for surgery did not have clear documentation as to whether symptoms were bulk symptoms or abnormal uterine bleeding secondary to myomas, which may indicate higher rates of hysterectomy for abnormal uterine bleeding than what we observed. Our study corroborates previous work suggesting the need for quality improvement efforts to prevent inappropriate hysterectomies by improving alternative treatment protocols for managing benign gynecologic conditions [1,16,17]. To implement these practice changes, the characterization of current utilization rates of alternative treatments and development of condition-specific treatment strategies are needed.
Prevalence and determinants of hysterectomy in India
2023, Scientific Reports
- ☆
Funded in part by grant no. R18HS07095 from the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, and in part by the Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program.
- 1
The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research or the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
- 2
The authors thank the members of the expert panel (Bruce Bagley, Constance Bohon, Vivian Dickerson, Karen Freund, Joseph Gambone, Frank Ling, Anne Moulton, Herbert Peterson, and Marian Swinker) for their assistance in developing the ratings, and Stanley Zinberg of ACOG for assistance with revising the criteria.