Original article
Refusal and information bias associated with postal questionnaires and face-to-face interviews in very elderly subjects,☆☆

https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(95)00527-7Get rights and content

Abstract

Our objectives were (1) to analyze the refusal bias associated with postal questionnaires and face-to-face interviews and (2) to compare responses elicited from a postal questionnaire with those provided by a face-to-face interview in subjects over 75 years of age. Our methods included a postal questionnaire sent to a representative sample of community-dwelling elderly individuals (n = 842). All subjects were also invited to participate in an in-home interview conducted by a trained nurse. One hundred and six subjects (12.6%) were nonrespondents to the postal questionnaire. These nonrespondents were more cognitively impaired, more disabled, and showed a higher 1-year mortality rate (13.2 versus 5.2%) than respondents. Late respondents who needed a reminder letter were similar to nonrespondents. One hundred and eighty-seven subjects (22.2%) refused to participate in the home interview. These nonparticipants were similar to the participants on age, sex, 1-year mortality rate, and responses given to all but two postal questions. Comparison of postal questionnaire responses and face-to-face responses revealed that agreement was substantial to moderate for factual information (κ = 0.41 to 0.80) but poor for clinical information (depression, cognitive impairment, disability). A short index including age, sex, and six questions on disability was useful in identifying disabled subjects by a postal questionnaire. Our conclusion is that nonresponse bias is evidenced when postal questionnaires are utilized in the very elderly population and caution should be used when interpreting health data obtained by this technique. Refusal bias from face-to-face interviewing is less important in this population.

References (56)

  • AMD Porter

    The Edinburgh birthday card scheme

  • DS Dillman
  • R Hébert et al.

    Le Système de mesure de l'autonomie fonctionnelle (SMAF)

    Revue Gériatrie

    (1988)
  • R Hébert et al.

    The Functional Autonomy Measurement System (SMAF): Description and validation of an instrument for the measurement of handicaps

    Age Ageing

    (1988)
  • R Hébert et al.

    Profil d'autonomie fonctionnelle de personnes âgées en institution

    Cahiers I'ACFAS

    (1986)
  • EL Teng et al.

    The modified Mini-Mental State (3MS) Examination

    J Clin Psychiat

    (1987)
  • EL Teng et al.

    The Modified Mini-Mental State (The 3MS) Test

    Clin Neuropsychol

    (1987)
  • R Hébert et al.

    Validation de l'adaptation française du Modified Mini-Mental State (3MS)

    Revue Gériatrie

    (1992)
  • J Vézina et al.

    Comparison de la performance diagnostique de l'Inventaire de dépression gériatrique de Beck et de l'Échelle de dépression gériatrique: utilisation des courbes caractéristiques

  • L Hyer et al.

    Concurrent and discriminant validities of the Geriatric Depression Scale with older psychiatric inpatients

    Psychol Rep

    (1984)
  • TL Brink et al.

    Geriatric depression scale reliability: Order, examiner and reminiscence effects

    Clin Gerontol

    (1985)
  • JI Sheikh et al.

    Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS): Recent evidence and development of a shorter version

  • JT Norris et al.

    Assessment of depression in the geriatric medical outpatients: The validity of two screening measures

    J Am Geriatr Soc

    (1987)
  • P Bourque et al.

    Étude psychométrique de l'Échelle de dépression gériatrique

    Revue Canadienne du Vieillissement

    (1990)
  • D Clayton et al.
  • J Cohen

    A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales

    Educ Psychol Meas

    (1960)
  • JR Landis et al.

    The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data

    Biometrics

    (1977)
  • FC Pannill et al.

    Functional Assessment Screening

  • Cited by (101)

    • Participation bias in postal surveys among older adults: The role played by self-reported health, physical functional decline and frailty

      2012, Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics
      Citation Excerpt :

      During study development, response rate to a postal survey can probably be increased using simple procedures, such as sending a paid envelope for responses, and sending regularly reminders to non-respondents. For example, before sending the first reminder, Hébert et al. (1996b) had obtained a response rate of 40.4% in a postal survey among the elderly; this response rate reached 70.7% after sending the first reminder (sent 7 days after the original mailing), and 87.4% after sending a personalized reminder letter (sent 3 weeks after the original mailing). Another way to reduce the effects of non-response bias is to use statistical procedures that deal with missing data.

    • Morbidity in aged Finns: A systematic review

      2012, Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Presented at the 49th Annual Scientific Meeting of the American Geriatrics Society, Washington D.C., November 16, 1992.

    ☆☆

    Funded by the National Health Research and Development Program, Health and Welfare, Canada.

    View full text