Original article
Scaling the Spanish version of the Nottingham Health Profile: Evidence of limited value of item weights

https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(95)00064-XGet rights and content

Abstract

The Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) is a measure of health status developed in Great Britain and adapted into Spanish. The objective of the study was to obtain item weights for the Spanish version and to compare them with those of the original instrument, to further assess the cross-cultural equivalence of the new version. The usefulness of using weights in obtaining scores for the Spanish version was also evaluated.

Weights for the Spanish items were obtained using Thurstone's method of paired comparisons in a sample of 1123 individuals. Correlations between Spanish and English weights ranged from 0.72 to 0.93. A comparison between unweighted, weighted, and randomly weighted NHP scores was also performed. Results showed extremely high correlations between these scoring strategies, and a similar precision for discriminating different levels of health status. Scaling assumptions for NHP scales were consistently satisfied using unweighted scores.

Item weights comparison provided evidence of the cross-cultural equivalence of the adapted version. Nevertheless, the unweighted NHP scoring is recommended because weighted NHP items do not improve the psychometric properties of the instrument.

References (57)

  • A Domingo Salvany et al.

    Propuesta de un indicador de la “clase social” basado en la ocupación

    Gac Sanit

    (1989)
  • G Bravo et al.

    Estimating the reliability of continuous measures with Cronbach's alpha or the intraclass correlation coefficient: Toward the integration of two traditions

    J Clin Epidemiol

    (1991)
  • X Badia et al.

    Re-scaling the Spanish version of the Sickness Impact Profile: An opportunity for the assessment of cross-cultural equivalence

    J Clin Epidemiol

    (1995)
  • G Permanyer-Miralda et al.

    Comparison of perceived health status and conventional functional evaluation in patients with stable coronary artery disease

    J Clin Epidemiol

    (1991)
  • AR Feinstein

    Clinimetrics

    (1987)
  • SM Hunt et al.

    Measuring Health Status

    (1986)
  • I McDowell et al.

    Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires

    (1987)
  • A Bowling

    Measuring Health: A Review of Quality of Life Measurement Scales

    (1991)
  • SM Hunt et al.

    A quantitative approach to perceived health status: A validation study

    J Epidemiol Community Health

    (1980)
  • SM Hunt et al.

    Measuring health status: A new tool for clinicians and epidemiologists

    J R Coll Gen Pract

    (1985)
  • SP McKenna et al.

    Weighting the seriousness of perceived health using Thurstone's method of paired comparisons

    Int J Epidemiol

    (1981)
  • LL Thurstone

    A law of comparative judgment

    Psychol Rev

    (1927)
  • RA Bradley

    Science, statistics, and paired comparisons

    Biometrics

    (1976)
  • DL Patrick et al.

    A cross-cultural comparison of health status values

    Am J Public Health

    (1985)
  • SM Hunt et al.

    Cross-cultural adaptation of health measures

    Health Policy

    (1991)
  • J Alonso et al.

    Spanish version of the Nottingham Health Profile: Translation and preliminary validity

    Am J Public Health

    (1990)
  • JC Nunnally

    Psychometric Theory

    (1978)
  • DL Streiner et al.

    Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use

    (1989)
  • Cited by (35)

    • Longer response scales improved the acceptability and performance of the Nottingham Health Profile

      2006, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The response rate and item completion rates were good. Like others, we found that floor effects were acceptable, but ceiling effects were large [14–16], and reliability coefficients exceeded recommended levels [8–14]. Validation by numerical dimension-specific items yielded results that were only slightly worse than those of the alternative versions of the questionnaire.

    • Paired comparisons of sensory pain adjectives

      2004, European Journal of Pain
    • A comparison of 4 questionnaires to measure fatigue in postpoliomyelitis syndrome

      2004, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Citation Excerpt :

      It must be mentioned that most of the NHP energy category scores reported in the literature were calculated from weighted item scores.37 However, the importance of weighting is under discussion,38,39 and the median score of 33 found in our study is well within the range of values reported in the literature.2,11–13,36 Analysis of concurrent validity showed low correlations (range, .43–.68) between the total scores of all pairs of questionnaires, which indicates that little of the variation in score of 1 questionnaire was explained by the variation in score of another questionnaire.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This research was supported by a grant from the “Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria (FIS) (Expediente No. 90/0535)” and by a Ph. D. candidate grant from the “Comissió Interdepartemental de Recerca i Innovació Tecnològica (CIRIT) i la Direcció General d'Universitats de la Generalitat de Catalunya”.

    View full text