Original article
Detecting survival effects of socioeconomic status: Problems in the use of aggregate measures

https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(94)90194-5Get rights and content

Abstract

Direct measures of SES are seldom included in medical records or large databases on disease incidence or survival, forcing researchers to infer the SES characteristics of individuals from aggregate data (e.g. census tract-level income, education, etc.). This paper assesses the degree of error that results from such inference and the impact this error may have on reported relationships between SES and survival. The authors obtained both individual and census tract-level data on 536 persons diagnosed with cancer between 1980 and 1982 and monitored their survival through 1992. Pearson correlations between individual-level and census tract-level SES variables ranged between 0.2 and 0.4. Statistically significant relationships between SES and survival were observed in the models based on individual-level but not census tract-level SES data. The authors computed the degree to which inference of individual-level from census tract-level SES reduces estimates of risk ratios across SES. It appears likely that much larger numbers of observations than have been used in published studies will be needed to better understand the relationship of SES to survival and other disease outcomes.

References (12)

  • H.H. Dayal et al.

    Race and socioeconomic status in survival from breast cancer

    J Chron Dis

    (1982)
  • E.L. Wegner et al.

    Racial and socioeconomic status differences in survival of colorectal cancer patients in Hawaii

    Cancer

    (1982)
  • L. LeMarchand et al.

    Relationship of ethnicity and other prognostic factors to breast cancer survival patterns in Hawaii

    J Natl Cancer Inst

    (1984)
  • H.P. Freeman

    Cancer in the economically disadvantaged

    Cancer

    (1989)
  • H.H. Dayal et al.

    Race, socioeconomic status, and other prognostic factors for survival from prostate cancer

    J Natl Cancer Inst

    (1985)
  • T.N. Chirikos et al.

    Economic status and survivorship in digestive system cancers

    Cancer

    (1985)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (77)

  • Impacts of health insurance on tympanostomy tube outcomes in the pediatric population

    2023, International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
  • Health Care Disparities and the Future of Pancreatic Cancer Care

    2021, Surgical Oncology Clinics of North America
    Citation Excerpt :

    Of these, self-report is the optimal method and should be used when feasible. With regard to socioeconomic status, the use of individual-level income is not reliable and thus census tract or zip code level should be used as estimation.72 As previously noted, some have argued for the use of socioeconomic status as a proxy for race, education, and urban environment, but this is not ideal.

  • Predicting for Lost to Follow-up in Surgical Management of Patients with Chronic Subdural Hematoma

    2021, World Neurosurgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    These included factors such as educational level, level of social support, easy access to communication (e.g., a cell phone), and individual income data. Although zip code data were available for our patients, extrapolating socioeconomic status from census data using solely the zip code can lead to additional confounding.29 Future research or quality improvement initiatives should strive to prospectively collect these variables.

  • Sociodemographic, socioeconomic, and clinical determinants of survival in patients with cancer: A systematic review of the literature focused on the elderly

    2018, Journal of Geriatric Oncology
    Citation Excerpt :

    This variable, which is the only individual-level variable available in the SEER-Medicare linked database, is a measure of poverty but it is not sensitive [64]. Because individual measures of socioeconomic position are not always available and reliable, aggregated data used to be a substitute with strengths and limitations [65–68]. However, no consensus exists on which aggregated data to choose in order to study health disparities.

  • Role of individual-housing–based socioeconomic status measure in relation to smoking status among late adolescents with asthma

    2016, Annals of Epidemiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Despite the potential relationship of SES to smoking rate among those with asthma, socioeconomic data are often unavailable in data sets used in clinical research, such as administrative data and medical records [24–26]. The neighborhood SESs (e.g., Census data) are often used as a proxy of individual SES, but literature has found that the use of area-based proxies for individual-level measures resulted in overestimates or underestimates of socioeconomic gradients in health [27–31]. Also, it has been reported that individual-level socioeconomic measures are more strongly associated with smoking history than area-level measures among late adolescents [32].

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text