Original article
The disability rating index: An instrument for the assessment of disability in clinical settings

https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(94)90086-8Get rights and content

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate an instrument for assessment of physical disability, mainly intended for clinical settings, the Disability Rating Index (DRI). Healthy persons (n = 1092), both white and blue collar workers, and patients (n = 366) with different levels of physical capacity, were assessed. Most of the patients (n = 303) underwent rehabilitation programmes for neck/shoulder/low-back pain but some (n = 47) were arthritis patients waiting for hip or knee replacement surgery, or wheelchair patients with multiple sclerosis (n = 16). The reliability was investigated by test-retest studies, intra- and inter-rater and internal consistency studies. Five construct validity tests were carried out: a discrimination study; a converging validity test; a test for sensitivity to small alterations in health status; and two correlational validity tests. Correlation of the self-reported DRI to the actual performance in similar activities was carried out. Responsiveness was tested by correlation of the DRI before/after replacement surgery for arthritis. The test-retest correlations were 0.83–0.95 in the studies, including correlation of different versions. The intra- and inter-rater reproducibility was 0.98 and 0.99 respectively. The Kruskal-Wallis test in the discrimination study yielded p < 0.0001. More than 90% of the respondents completed the questionnaire correctly. Correlation of the DRI to the Functional Status Questionnaire was 0.46. The responsiveness was excellent, p = 0.0001. The DRI proved to be a robust, practical clinical and research instrument with good responsiveness and acceptability for assessment of disability caused by impairment of common motor functions.

References (36)

  • S. Katz et al.

    Studies of illness in the aged. The Index of ADL: a standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function

    JAMA

    (1963)
  • F.I. Mahoney et al.

    Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index

    Md State Med J

    (1965)
  • M.W. Linn et al.

    The Rapid Disability Rating Scale—2

    J Am Geriatr Soc

    (1982)
  • J.R. McWhinnie

    Disability assessment in population surveys: result of the OECD common development effort

    Rev Epidémiol State Publique

    (1981)
  • M. Roland et al.

    A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: Development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain

    Spine

    (1983)
  • M. Bergner et al.

    The Sickness Impact Profile: conceptual formulation and methodology for the development of a health status measure

    Int J Health Serv

    (1976)
  • J. Fairbank et al.

    The Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire

    Physiotherapy

    (1980)
  • R.F. Meenan et al.

    Measuring health status in arthritis: the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales

    Arthritis Rheum

    (1980)
  • Cited by (297)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text