Original article
Factors associated with self-reported back-pain prevalence: A populationdashbased study

https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9681(85)90023-2Get rights and content

Abstract

We present a study of demographic factors associated with self-reported back pain prevalence in a populationdashbased study. Study variables were age, gender, occupation, physical demand of occupation, income, education and marital status. Crude associations of the independent variables and reported back pain were in general agreement with other cross-sectional studies. Multiway contingency tables and multivariate models were employed for further analyses. When we controlled each of the other variables, only gender, education and marital status remained strongly associated with reported back pain. Using these three variables plus age, we developed regression models for the prediction of back pain and identified a steep gradient of prevalence: the highest prevalence (44–46%) was in no-longer-married women aged 50–64, regardless of education, while the lowest prevalence (9–11%) was in men who were married and had greater than a high school education. Because the models employ only census-type variables, they should be easy to validate or use to predict back pain prevalence in other populations.

References (40)

  • LD Haber

    Disabling effects of chronic disease and impairment—II: Functional capacity limitations

    J Chron Dis

    (1973)
  • SZ Nagi et al.

    A social epidemiology of back pain in a general population

    J Chron Dis

    (1973)
  • S Greenland et al.

    Controlled clinical trials of manipulation: a review and a proposal

    JOM

    (1980)
  • HC Pheasant

    Backache—its nature, incidence and cost

    West J Med

    (1977)
  • R Andersen et al.

    Societal and individual determinants of medical care utilization in the United States

    Milbank Mem Fund Q

    (1973)
  • LA Aday et al.

    The Utilization of Health Services: Indices and Correlates; a Research Bibliography

    (1972)
  • JB McKinlay

    Some approaches and problems in the study of the use of services: an overview

    J Health Soc Behav

    (1972)
  • J Mausner et al.

    Epidemiology: an Introductory Text

  • National Center for Health Statistics

    Prevalence of Chronic Skin and Musculo-skeletal Conditions

    (1976)
  • National Center for Health Statistics

    Prevalence of Selected Impairments

    (1974)
  • HA Valkenburg et al.

    The epidemiology of low back pain

  • LS Cunningham et al.

    Epidemiology of musculoskeletal impairments and associated disability

    Am J Pub Health

    (1984)
  • F Biering-Sørensen

    Low back trouble in a general population of 30-, 40-, 50-, and 60-year-old men and women. Study design, representativeness and basic results

    Dan Med Bull

    (1982)
  • F Biering-Sørensen

    A prospective study of low back pain in a general population. I. Occurrence, recurrence and aetiology

    Scand J Rehabil Med

    (1983)
  • MS Marquis et al.

    Measurement Evaluation of the Health Insurance Screening Interview

    Rand Corp. R-2107-HEW

    (1977)
  • JE Ware et al.

    Conceptualization and Measurement of Health Status for Adults in the Health-Insurance Study: Model for Health and Methodology

    Rand Corp. R-1987-1

    (1980)
  • A Magora

    Investigation of the relation between low back pain and occupation. V. Psychological aspects

    Scand J Rehab Med

    (1973)
  • O Dehlin et al.

    Back symptoms and psychological perception of work

    Scand J Rehab Med

    (1977)
  • JW Frymoyer et al.

    Epidemiologic studies of low-back pain

    Spine

    (1980)
  • YM Bishop et al.

    Discrete Multivariate Analysis: Theory and Practice

    (1975)
  • Cited by (107)

    • Clinical features of axial spondyloarthritis

      2015, Rheumatology: Sixth Edition
    • Associations among low back pain, income, and body mass index in Taiwan

      2013, Spine Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      Low back pain has been found to be related to variables such as age, sex, educational level, exercise, and smoking [11,12,29]. Empirically, the association between socioeconomic status and LBP was inconsistent in the existing literature [30–32]. Our basic exploratory analyses did show that persons in the low-income group were more likely to have a more physically heavy workload, to be a smoker, to have a higher BMI, and were less educated than high-income group.

    • Musculoskeletal problems and ergonomic risk assessment in rubber tappers: A community-based study in southern Thailand

      2012, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Social stress or emotions increase pain perception and decrease pain thresholds. Similar to previous reports (Nagi et al., 1973; Reisbord and Greenland, 1985), we found a significant association between lower levels of education and income and low back pain, however, the association of working while in poor general health and low back pain among people of low socioeconomic status remains unknown. Since, we found that abnormal physical ergonomic factors were associated with low back pain.

    • The Epidemiology of low back pain

      2010, Best Practice and Research: Clinical Rheumatology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Manahan et al. found in their study of 1685 villagers in the Philippines that low back pain was not related to gender [125], while Anderson found no significant differences in the prevalence of back pain between men and women in Nepal [126]. Low educational status has been shown to be associated with an increased prevalence of low back pain [127–130]. This association is an even stronger predictor of episode duration and poor outcomes from low back pain [128].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text