The application of respondent-driven sampling (RDS) is a promising new approach to understanding hidden populations, including those at high risk for HIV infection. The method has significant advantages over other sampling methods, including the possibility that representativeness samples can be accrued. However, the requirements for a respondent-driven sample to achieve representative and to demonstrate its superiority over other methods are quite strict. This report focuses on whether the accompanying paper by Ramirez-Valles et al. fulfills these requirements in terms of the theorems underlying RDS regarding sample recruitment rates, referral patterns, and network sizes. Further, it investigates the assertion that the accrued sample has proven that RDS is superior to more traditional time-location or venue-based sampling methods. Unconvinced that either is the case, the author suggests a method to test if RDS is indeed the gold-standard recruitment strategy for obtaining inclusive and representative samples of hidden populations.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Broadhead, R. S., Heckathorn, D. D., Grund, J., Stern, L. S., and Anthony, D. L. (1995). Drug users versus outreach workers in combatting AIDS: Preliminary evidence of a peer-driven intervention. Journal of Drug Issues, 23, 531–564.
Broadhead, R. S., Heckathorn, D. D., Weakliem, D. L., Anthony, D. L., Madray, H., and Mills, R. J. (1998). Harnessing peer networks as an instrument for AIDS prevention: Results from a peer-driven intervention. Public Health Reports, 113(Suppl. 1), 42–57.
Heckathorn, D. D., Semaan, S., Broadhead, R. S., and Hughes, J. J. (2002). Extensions of respondent-driven sampling: A new approach to the study of injection drug users aged 18–25. AIDS and Behavior, 6, 55–67.
Heckathorn, D. D. (1997). Respondent-driven sampling; A new approach to the study of hidden populations. Social Problems, 44, 174–199.
Heckathorn, D. (2002). Respondent driven sampling II: Deriving valid population estimates from chain-referral samples of hidden populations. Social Problems, 49, 11–34.
Martin, J. L., Wiley, J., and Osmond, D. (2003). Social networks and unobserved heterogeniety in risk for AIDS. Population Research Policy Review, 22, 65–90.
Parsons, J. (2005). HIV positive gay and bisexual men. In S.C. Kalichman (Ed.), Positive prevention: Reducing HIV transmission among people living with HIV/AIDS (pp. 99–129). New York: Springer.
Ramirez-Valles, J., Heckathorn, D. D., Vázquez, R., Diaz, R., and Campbell, R. T. (2005). From networks to populations: The development and application of respondent-driven sampling among IDUs and Latino gay men. AIDS and Behavior.
Salganik, M. J., and Heckathorn, D. D. (2004). Making unbiased estimates about hidden populations using respondent-driven sampling. Sociology Methodology, 34, 193–240.
Semaan, S., Lauby, J., and Liebman, J. (2002). Street and network sampling in evaluation studies of HIV risk-reduction interventions. AIDS Reviews, 4, 213–223.
Thompson, S. K., and Frank, O. (2000). Model-based estimation with link-tracing sampling designs. Survey Methodology, 26, 87–98.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Heimer, R. Critical Issues and Further Questions About Respondent-Driven Sampling: Comment on Ramirez-Valles, et al. (2005). AIDS Behav 9, 403–408 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-005-9030-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-005-9030-1