Skip to main content
Log in

Identifying components comprising neighborhood quality of life

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research identified factors affecting neighborhood quality of life. A total of 140 men and women from diverse groups throughout the San Francisco Bay area participated. Each person completed a critical incident questionnaire reporting specific events within the neighborhood that affected his or her quality of life. Analysis of 695 incidents resulted in 17 factors within five main areas: (a) Environmental and Physical Conditions, (2) Economic Conditions, (3) Facilities and Services, (4) Political Conditions, and (5) Personal Characteristics and Interpersonal Relationships. The approach and results can be used to study impacts of specific social policies on neighborhoods and their residents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • AndrewsF. M. and WitheyS. B.: 1974, ‘Developing measures of perceived life quality: Results from several national surveys’, Social Indicators Research 1, pp. 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • AxelrodM.: 1956, ‘Urban structure and social participation’, American Sociological Review 21, pp. 13–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • BarkerR. G. and SchoggenP.: 1973, Qualities of Community Life (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).

    Google Scholar 

  • BellW. and BoatM. D.: 1957, ‘Urban neighborhoods and informal social relations’, American Journal of Sociology 63, pp. 391–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • BildB. R. and HavighurstR. J.: 1976, ‘Senior citizens in great cities: The case of Chicago’, The Gerontologist 16, Part II, pp. 1–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • CampbellA.: 1972, ‘Aspirations, satisfaction, and fulfillment’, in A.Campbell and P. E.Converse (eds.), The Human Meaning of Social Change. (Russell Sage Foundation, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • CantrilH.: 1965, The Pattern of Human Concerns (Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, N.J.).

    Google Scholar 

  • DaviesJ. C.III: 1966, ‘Neighborhood groups and urban renewal (Columbia University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • DeweyR.: 1960, ‘The rural-urban continuum: Real but relatively unimportant’, American Journal of Sociology 25, pp. 60–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • DuncanO. D.: 1969, Toward Social Reporting: Next Steps (Russell Sage Foundation, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Protection Agency: 1973, The Quality of Life Concept: A Potential new Tool for Decision-makers (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.).

    Google Scholar 

  • FarisR. E. L. and DunhamH. W.: 1939, Mental Disorder in Urban Areas (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).

    Google Scholar 

  • FavaS. F.: 1956, ‘Suburbanism as a way of life’, American Sociological Review 21, pp. 34–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • FellinP., and LitwakE.: 1968, ‘The neighborhood in urban American society’, Social Work 13, pp. 72–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • FlanaganJ. C.: 1954, ‘The critical incident technique’, Psychological Bulletin 51, pp. 327–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • FlanaganJ. C.: 1974, Measuring Human Performance (American Institutes for Research, Palo Alto, Calif.).

    Google Scholar 

  • FlanaganJ. C. and Russ-EftD.: 1975, An Empirical Study to Aid in Formulating Educational Goals (AIR-42000-7/75-FR) (American Institutes for Research, Palo Alto, Calif.).

    Google Scholar 

  • FlanaganJ. C. and Russ-EftD.: 1977, Identifying Opportunities for Improving the Quality of Life of Older Age Groups: Progress Report (AIR-53500-6/77-IR) (American Institutes for Research, Palo Alto, Calif.).

    Google Scholar 

  • GansG. D.: 1962, The Urban Villagers (Free Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goals for Americans: The Report of the President's Commission on National Goals: 1960, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.

  • GreerS.: 1956, ‘Urbanism Reconsidered: A Comparative Study of Local Areas in a Metropolis’, American Sociological Review 21, pp. 19–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • GreerS. and KubeE.: 1959, ‘Urbanism and social structure: A Los Angeles study’, in M.Sussman (ed.), Community Structure and Analysis (Crowell, New York), pp. 93–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • GrossB. M. and SpringerM.: 1967, ‘New goals for social information’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences 2, pp. 208–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • HoytH.: 1939, The Structure and Growth of Residential Neighborhoods in American Cities' (Federal Housing Administration, Washington, D.C.).

    Google Scholar 

  • KoelleH. H.: 1974, ‘An experimental study on the determination of a definition for the “quality of life”’, Regional Studies 9, pp. 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • KnoxP. L.: 1974, ‘Level of living: A conceptual framework for monitoring regional differences in well-being,’ Regional Studies 8, pp. 11–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • LansingJ. B. and MaransR. W.: 1969, ‘Planners notebook: Evaluation of neighborhood quality’, Journal of the American Institute of Planners 35, 195–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • LitwakE. and FellinP.: 1963, ‘Neighborhood cohesion under conditions of mobility’, American Sociological Review 28, pp. 364–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • LoganJ. R.: 1976, ‘Industrialization and the stratification of cities in suburban regions’, American Journal of Sociology 82, pp. 333–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louis, A.: 1975, ‘The worst American city’, Harpers Magazine (January 1975), pp. 67–71.

  • MarkelyO. W. and BagleyM. D.: 1975, Minimum standards for quality of life (EPA-600/5-75-012), (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.).

    Google Scholar 

  • MartinW.: 1956, ‘The structuring of social relationship engendered by suburban residence’, American Sociological Review 21, pp. 446–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • MossM.: 1968, ‘Consumption: A report on contemporary issues’, in E. B.Sheldon, and W. E.Moore (eds.), Indicators of Social Change: Concepts and Measurement (Russell Sage Foundation, New York), pp. 449–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • The OECD Social Indicator Development Programme; List of Social Concerns Common to Most OECD Countries’ 1973, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Manpower and Social Affairs Directorate, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • ParkR. E.: 1915, ‘The city: Suggestions for the investigation of human behavior in the city environment’, American Journal of Sociology 10, pp. 517–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • ParkR. E.: 1952, Human Communities (Free Press, Glencoe, Ill.).

    Google Scholar 

  • ParkR. E. and BurgessE. W.: 1925, The City (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).

    Google Scholar 

  • RossiP. H.: 1972, ‘Community social indicators’, in A.Campbell and P. E.Converse (eds.), The Human Meaning of Social Change (Russell Sage Foundation, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • SchneiderM.: 1975, ‘The quality of life in large American cities: Objective and subjective social indicators’, Social Indicators Research 1, pp. 495–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • SchwartzB. (ed.): 1967, The Changing Face of the Suburbs (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).

    Google Scholar 

  • SheldonE. B. and LandK. C.: 1972, ‘Social reporting for the 1970s: A review and programmatic statement’, Policy Sciences 3, pp. 137–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • ShevkyE. and BellW.: 1955, Social Area Analysis (Stanford University Press, Stanford, Calif.).

    Google Scholar 

  • ShevkyE. and WilliamsM.: 1949, The Social Areas of Los Angeles (University of California Press, Berkeley, Calif.).

    Google Scholar 

  • SimmelG.: 1957, ‘The metropolis and mental life’, in P. K. Hatt and A. J. Reiss, Jr. (eds.), Cities and Society: The Revised Reader in Urban Sociology (Free Press of Glencoe, New York), pp. 635–646.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spautz, M.: 1976, The socio-economic gap: Can we develop an index for quality of life?’, Paper presented at the meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Philadelphia, Pa., December 1971.

  • Spiro, S. E.: 1968, ‘Effects of neighborhood characteristics on participation in voluntary associations’ (University of Michigan doctoral dissertation, Ann Arbor, Mich.).

  • SussmanM. B. (ed.): 1959, Community Structure and Analysis (Crowell, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistical Policy Division of the Office of Management and Budget: 1973, Social indicators: Selected Statistics on Social Conditions and Trends in the United States (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.).

    Google Scholar 

  • SuttlesG. D.: 1968, The Social Order of the Slum (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).

    Google Scholar 

  • Theodorson G. A.: ‘Acceptance of industrialization and its attendant consequences’, American Sociological Review 18, pp. 477–484.

  • U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare: 1969, Toward a Social Report (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.).

    Google Scholar 

  • WarrenD. I.: 1971, ‘Neigborhoods in urban areas’, in Encyclopedia of Social Work, Vol. I (National Association of Social Workers, New York), pp. 872–882.

    Google Scholar 

  • WarrenD. I.: 1975, Black Neighborhoods: An Assessment of Community Power (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, Mich.).

    Google Scholar 

  • WarrenR. L.: 1963, The Community in America (Rand McNally, Chicago).

    Google Scholar 

  • WilliamsO., HermanH., LiebmanC., and DyeT.: 1965, Suburban Differences and Metropolitan Policies (University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, Pa.).

    Google Scholar 

  • WirthL.: 1965, ‘Urbanism as a way of life’, in P. K.Hatt and A. J.Reiss, Jr. (eds.), Cities and Society: The Revised Reader in Urban Sociology (Free Press of Glencoe, New York), pp. 46–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • WoodR. C.: 1958, Suburbia: Its People and Their Politics (Houghton Mifflin, Boston).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The research reported here was funded by a Behavioral Research Support Grant administered by the American Institutes for Research. I would like to thank William V. Clemans, John C. Flanagan, Kevin J. Gilmartin, Robert E. Krug, and Victor W. Rouse for their critical comments on this paper and Michel Greethy for her assistance in collecting and preparing the data for analysis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Russ-Eft, D. Identifying components comprising neighborhood quality of life. Soc Indic Res 6, 349–372 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00300654

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00300654

Keywords

Navigation