Table 2

Numeric values contributing to summary estimates shown in table 1, for those studies with sufficient data for quantitative synthesis, based on estimates pooled across time points within age groups within each study

Outcome: DMFT-no-comparison community
StudyYear of cessationAge and number of years postcessationPrecessation meanPrecessation SDPrecessation nPostcessation meanPostcessation SDPostcessation n
La Salud, Cuba271990age 6/7; 7 years (1997)0.070.341070.070.3182
age 8/9; 7 years (1997)0.501.041590.600.98123
age 10/11; 7 years (1997)1.101.511260.801.21104
age 12/13; 7 years (1997)2.102.11781.101.75105
Prague, Czech Republic28 291988age 6; 7 years (1995)0.130.025100.320.03551
East Germany (Spremberg)25 261990age 8; 3 and 6 years (1993 and 1996)0.811.23910280.440.903382
age 9; 3 and 6 years (1993 and 1996)1.101.36910060.611.098449
age 12; 3 and 6 years (1993 and 1996)3.992.5598562.162.029412
age 13; 3 and 6 years (1993 and 1996)4.923.0387662.252.131507
age 15; 3 and 6 years (1993 and 1996)6.893.5864544.043.233404
age 16; 3 and 6 years (1993 and 1996)7.624.0643544.683.284419
East Germany (Zittau)261993age 12; 3 years (1996)2.472.063371.961.96184
Outcome: DMFT-comparison community*
StudyYear of cessationAge and number of years postcessationPost–pre (cessation community): meanPost–pre (cessation community): SDPost–pre (cessation community): nPost–pre (comparison community): meanPost–pre (comparison community): meanPost–pre (comparison community): mean
Stranraer, Scotland†31–341983age 10; 3 and 5 years (1986 and 1988)0.342.44546−0.673.20501
Tiel, Netherlands‡38 391973age 15; 6–7, 8–9, 10–11, 12–13, 14–15 years (1979–80; 1981–82; 1983–84; 1985–86; 1987–88)−0.756.083191−6.597.232538
Chemnitz, East Germany25 26 §1990age 6; 1 and 5 year2 (1991, 1995)−0.020.6684920.000.661974
age 7; 1 and 5 year2 (1991, 1995)−0.111.0184920.001.301974
age 8; 1 and 5 years (1991, 1995)−0.271.268492−0.181.591974
age 9; 1 and 5 year2 (1991, 1995)−0.301.738492−0.041.951974
age 10; 1 and 5 year2 (1991, 1995)−0.262.2784920.062.201974
age 11; 1 and 5 year2 (1991, 1995)−0.372.838492−0.242.571974
age 12; 1 and 5 year2 (1991, 1995)−0.372.998492−0.213.061974
age 13; 1 and 5 year2 (1991, 1995)−0.573.528492−0.593.661974
age 14; 1 and 5 year2 (1991, 1995)−0.534.078492−0.804.221974
age 15; 1 and 5 year2 (1991, 1995)−0.754.428492−1.774.741974
Outcome: deft-no-comparison community
StudyYear of cessationAge and number of years postcessationPrecessation meanPrecessation SDPrecessation nPostcessation meanPostcessation SDPostcessation n
Wick, Scotland371979age 5/6; 5 years (±radiograph)2.892.572124.111.927252
China35 361983age 3; 2.5 and 4.5 years (1986, 1988)1.330.174482.4960.354211.000
age 4; 2.5 and 4.5 years (1986, 1988)2.360.196263.2900.277328.000
age 5; 2.5 and 4.5 years (1986, 1988)2.470.175243.4850.285420.000
age 6; 2.5 and 4.5 years (1986, 1988)3.070.214983.3050.298428.000
  • *SD for change score was imputed, following Cochrane collaboration procedure using a correlation coefficient of 0.10

  • †For Stranraer, Scotland study,31–34 cessation community is Stranraer, comparison community is Annan.

  • ‡For Tiel, Netherlands study,38 cessation community is Tiel, comparison community is Culemborg.

  • §For the East Germany study,25 cessation community is Chemnitz, comparison community is Plauen. Furthermore, for this study, only an overall sample size per year was provided (not broken down by age). Values in this table were determined by dividing the n for each year by the number of age groups (10); for the combined groups, the value is halved.

  • DMFT, deft=decayed, missing, filled teeth (permanent, primary).