Table 1

Regression analysis of the total sample (n = 250782) for perceived general health: parameters and standard errors

Perceived general health (good/very good  = 1)
Step 1Step 2Step 3aStep 3b
*p⩽0.05; **p⩽0.01; ***p⩽0.001.
Age−0.039 (.000)***−0.039 (.000)***−0.039 (.000)***−0.039 (.000)***
Sex (woman)−0.134(.013)***−0.133 (.014)***−0.130(.014)***−0.132 (.014)***
Health insurance (private)0.308 (.015)***0.308 (.015)***0.302 (.015)***0.307 (.015)***
Level of education (high)0.262 (.019)***0.266 (.019)***0.267 (.019)***0.268 (.019)***
Attending school/studying0.030 (.028)0.032 (.028)0.038 (.028)0.034 (.028)
Unemployed/jobseeker−1.118 (.041)***−1.117 (.041)***−1.111 (.041)***−1.115 (.041)***
Housewife/houseman−0.350 (.020)***−0.352 (.020)***−0.354 (.020)***−0.352 (.020)***
Incapacitated−2.403 (.026)***−2.408 (.026)***−2.408 (.026)***−2.410 (.026)***
Retired−0.362 (.022)***−0.362 (.022)***−0.360 (.022)***−0.362 (.023)***
Job unknown−0.443 (.034)***−0.444 (.034)***−0.443 (.035)***−0.442 (035)***
Ethnic minority−0.450 (020)***−0.446 (020)***−0.439 (020)***−0.443 (.020)***
Very strongly urban−0.309 (.054)***−0.102 (.057)−0.070 (.062)
Strongly urban−0.173 (.049)**0.010 (.052)−0.015 (.053)
Moderately urban0.070 (.046)0.081 (.048)0.013 (.047)
Slightly urban0.014 (.046)0.079 (.046)0.031 (.045)
Percentage of green (1 km)0.005 (.000)***
Percentage of green (3 km)0.006 (.001)***