Odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) of reporting fair to very bad health for working and non-working participants adjusting for sex, age, and social class
| Independent variables* | Tertile | Working participants | Non-working participants |
|---|---|---|---|
| Odds ratios adjusted for sex, age, and social class | Odds ratios adjusted for sex, age, and social class | ||
| *The reference for each scale is that which was hypothesised as the most “advantageous” context in which to live for health—that is, the highest physical quality of the residential environment, etc. | |||
| Physical quality of | High | 1 | 1 |
| residential environment | Med | 1.12 (0.93 to 1.35) | 1.30 (1.08 to 1.58) |
| Low | 1.21 (1.02 to 1.45) | 1.23 (1.02 to 1.47) | |
| Public recreation | High | 1 | 1 |
| Med | 1.00 (0.83 to 1.22) | 1.05 (0.86 to 1.27) | |
| Low | 1.11 (0.93 to 1.33) | 0.90 (0.75 to 1.08) | |
| Health services | High | 1 | 1 |
| Med | 0.86 (0.72 to 1.05) | 1.16 (0.95 to 1.41) | |
| Low | 0.94 (0.77 to 1.14) | 1.09 (0.89 to 1.33) | |
| Left wing political climate | Low | 1 | 1 |
| High | 1.06 (0.89 to 1.25) | 1.36 (1.16 to 1.61) | |
| Access to private transport | High | 1 | 1 |
| Med | 1.16 (0.96 to 1.41) | 1.16 (0.97 to 1.39) | |
| Low | 1.13 (0.93 to 1.37) | 1.61 (1.33 to 1.92) | |
| Transport wealth | High | 1 | 1 |
| Med | 0.99 (0.83 to 1.18) | 1.23 (1.04 to 1.47) | |
| Low | 1.05 (0.85 to 1.30) | 1.47 (1.20 to 1.79) | |