Table 1

 Description of studies included in the meta-analysis

First author, yearParticipantsStudy topicInterventionsQuestionnaires returned/sent
Asch 19981000 primary care physicians identified through the American Medical Association Physician Master File (US).Attitudes about cost containment in cancer screening.1. $2 sent with questionnaire 2. $5 sent with questionnaire221/500 (44.2%) 296/500 (59.2%)
Bellizzi 1986200 people randomly selected from a city telephone directory, (US).Shopping convenience and lifestyle.1. No incentive 2. $1 bill included with questionnaire37/100 (37%) 54/100 (54%)
Berk 1993315 physicians (allergists and otolaryngologists) in Project HOPE survey (US).Tests and costs for diagnosing allergies.1. $10 with first mailing; follow up questionnaire and letter mentioning the incentive79/125 (63.2%)
2. No incentive with first mailing; Follow up questionnaire with $10 and letter explaining the importance of the study62/125 (49.6%)
3. No mention of $10 in either first or second mailing26/65 (40.0%)
Biner 1988200 of the 77216 residents of a mid-western city, randomly sampled from a telephone directory (US).Community needs assessment.2×2 factorial design: No incentive v $130/100 (30%) v
Reactance appeal v No reactance appeal61/100 (61%)
Biner 1990200 of the 120500 residents of a mid-western city, systematically sampled from a telephone directory (US).Community needs assessment.2×2 factorial design: $1 v $0.2567/100 (67%) v
Obliged to reply v Given in appreciation46/100 (46%)
Brennan 1991900 people listed on one of the 57 electoral rolls representing the main urban centres (New Zealand).Personal investments, banking and finance.1. No incentive 2. 20c coin with first mailing42/100 (42%) 46/100 (46%)
3. 50c coin with first mailing65/100 (65%)
4. $1 with first mailing49/100 (49%)
5. 20c coin with second mailing53/100 (53%)
6. 50c coin with second mailing45/100 (45%)
7. $1 with second mailing56/100 (56%)
8. Entry into prize draw for $200 cash offered with each mail out45/100 (45%)
9. Entry into prize draw for $200 gift voucher offered with each mail out50/100 (50%)
Brennan 1992a400 people listed on a financial service company’s ‘hot prospect’ list (New Zealand).Financial services.1. No incentive 2. $0.50144/200 (72%) 162/200 (81%)
Brennan 1992b400 people listed on the electoral roll (New Zealand).Use of brands of fruit juice.1. No incentive112/200 (56%)
2. $0.50128/200 (64%)
Brennan 1992c384 people listed on the electoral roll (New Zealand).Shopping.1. No incentive123/192 (64.1%)
2. $0.50134/192 (69.8%)
Brennan 1993a412 dairy and beef farmers (New Zealand).Use of mineral supplements.1. No incentive50/101 (49.5%)
2. $0.50 coin with first mailing70/103 (68.0%)
3. $1 coin with first mailing66/100 (66.0%)
4. $1 lottery ticket with first mailing64/108 (59.3%)
Brennan 1993b1847 people listed on the electoral roll (New Zealand).Attitudes toward social inequality.1. No incentive230/452 (50.9%)
2. $0.50 coin with first mailing278/454 (61.2%)
3. $1 coin with first mailing307/463 (66.3%)
4. Promise that $1 would be donated to a charity for each valid return (in each of three mailings)271/478 (56.7%)
Burns 1980400 bank, savings and loan chief executive officers (US).2×2 factorial design:54/200 (27.0%)
No incentive v $0.25 v
No follow up v Follow up postcard sent 10 days after initial mailing89/200 (44.5%)
Camunas 1990700 members of the New York State Nurses Association (US).Nursing association activities.1. No incentive 2. $1 bill63/300 (21.0%) 90/200 (45.0%)
3. Brochure27/200 (13.5%)
Collins 20004280 members of the RAND adolescent and young adult panel study drawn from schools across the US (US).Smoking and substance misuse.1. $20 cash with mailing 2. $20 cash on return of questionnaire1047/1689 (62.0%) 1019/1734 (58.8%)
3. $25 cash on return of questionnaire564/857 (65.8%)
Deehan 19973584 GPs who did not respond to two mailings of a questionnaire (UK).Work with patients who misuse alcohol.Third mailing: 1. No incentive 101/1188 (8.5%)
2. £5 charity donation57/607 (9.4%)
3. £10 charity donation58/578 (10.0%)
4. £5105/613 (17.1%)
5. £10135/598 (22.6%)
Fourth mailing to non-respondents in control group of third mailing:
1. £563/534 (11.8%)
2. £1085/536 (15.9%)
Denton 1988297 graduates from the Department of Educational Curriculum and Instruction at a large university in the south west (US).Educational knowledge and skills.2×2 factorial design: No incentive v $0.25 No newsletter v newsletter109/257 (42.4%) v 16/40 (40.0%)
Denton 1991100 graduates from the Department of Educational Curriculum and Instruction at a large university in the south west: (US).Educational knowledge and skills.1. No incentive 2. $0.25 3. $0.5012/20 (60.0%) 13/20 (65.0%) 14/20 (70.0%)
4. $114/20 (70.0%)
5. Raffle13/19 (68.4%)
Dommeyer 1980352 people listed in the Cincinnati telephone directory (US).Attitudes to mailed surveys.No incentive v pre-paid $0.25 in follow up21/176 (11.9%) 30/176 (17.0%)
Dommeyer 1988600 people listed in the Chicago and Pheonix telephone directory (US).Morality and conscience.1. No incentive 2. $0.25 coin37/100 (37%) 50/100 (50%)
3. $0.25 cheque37/100 (37%)
4. $0.25 money order38/100 (38%)
5. ‘Early bird’—get a share in an incentive ($25) if send questionnaire back quickly33/100 (33%)
6. Sweep stake (entered into sweepstake to win $25 if return questionnaire by deadline)30/100 (30%)
Donaldson 1999400 physicians randomly selected from a list of US physicians actively caring for at least one transplant patient (US).Interest in an internet consulting service.2×2 factorial design: No incentive v $5 cheque with initial mailing No follow up call v follow up call to non-respondents 4 weeks after initial mailing91/200 (45.5%) v 115/200 (57.5%)
Doob 1971a400 people listed in a phone book (Toronto and Ontario, Canada).Lifestyle.2×2 factorial design: No incentive v dime incentive60/200 (30.0%) v
No reactance v reactance (‘reactance’ was a request written to make participants feel an attempt was being made to limit their freedom)93/200 (46.5%)
Doob 1971b200 people listed in a phone book (Toronto and Ontario, Canada).Lifestyle.2×2 factorial design: No incentive v dime incentive30/100 (30%) v
No reactance v reactance48/100 (48%)
Doob 1971c200 people listed in a phone book (Toronto and Ontario, Canada).Lifestyle.2×2 factorial design: No incentive v $0.20 incentive36/100 (36%) v
No reactance v reactance53/100 (53%)
Doob 1973804 people listed in a California telephone directory (US).General.1. No incentive 2. $0.05110/268 (41.0%) 159/268 (59.3%)
3. $0.20191/268 (71.3%)
Doody 2003a1500 radiologist technologists who had not responded to two earlier mailings of a questionnaire (US).Physician diagnosed cancers and risk factors.1. No incentive 2. $1 bill46/300 (15.3%) 74/300 (24.7%)
3. $2 bill86/300 (28.7%)
4. $2 cheque63/300 (21.0%)
5. $5 cheque82/300 (27.3%)
Doody 2003b1200 radiologist technologists who had not responded to two earlier mailings of a questionnaire (US).Physician diagnosed cancers and risk factors.1. No incentive 2. $1 bill53/300 (17.7%) 71/300 (23.7%)
3. $2 bill84/300 (28.0%)
4. $2 cheque66/300 (22.0%)
Fiset 1994517 dentists insured by a major malpractice carrier in two western states (US).Malpractice claims experience.1. $5 2. $10156/258 (60.5%) 163/259 (62.9%)
Friedman 1979600 people listed in telephone directories of two suburban areas in the greater New York Metropolitan area (US).Public attitudes toward ethnic groups.2×2 factorial design: No incentive v $0.25 Sponsor name suggests black race v white race66/300 (22.0%) v 113/300 (37.7%)
Furse 1982600 microwave oven owners listed in a major manufacturer’s warranty registration records (US).Microwave ovens.3×2 factorial design: No incentive v $0.50 enclosed v $1 enclosed110/200 (55.0%) v
No charity incentive v charity incentive (promise of $1 to charity of respondent’s choice for returned questionnaire)154/200 (77.0%)
Gajraj 1990700 customers of a major public utility, comprising households in south western Ontario (Canada).Energy conservation.1. No incentive 2. $0.50 included34/100 (34%) 62/100 (62%)
3. Promise of $0.50 on return of completed questionnaire42/100 (42%)
4. Pen included41/100 (41%)
5. Promise of pen on return of completed questionnaire43/100 (43%)
6. Inclusion in share of winning from five Super Lotto lottery tickets55/100 (55%)
7. Promise of inclusion in share of five Super Lotto lottery tickets on return of completed questionnaire45/100 (45%)
Gendall 19981890 people on the electoral roll (New Zealand).Role of government and attitudes to work orientation.1. No incentive 2. Foil wrapped tea bag included386/632 (61.1%) 388/631 (61.5%)
3. $1 coin included431/627 (68.7%)
Gibson 19991446 residents of Pierce County who had been clients of Medicaid and 797 residents who had been clients of Washington Basic Health Plan for more than 6 months (US).Health and use of health services.1. No incentive 2. $1 3. $2209/412 (50.7%) 874/1467 (59.6%) 139/364 (38.2%)
Gillpatrick 1994619 engineers identified from the subscriber list of a major trade journal (US).Computer aided design workstations.2×2 factorial design: No incentive v $141/213 (19.2%) v
No pre-contact v pre-contact178/406 (43.8%)
Glisan 19821512 farmers from six geographical regions (US).Farm operations and crops.3×3×2 factorial design:73/504 (14.5%)
No incentive v $0.25 v promised survey results v
Tan v blue v white questionnaire122/504 (24.2%)
Regular stamp v commemorative stamp v
98/504 (19.4%)
Godwin 1979232 people in 60 countries, including government ministers, senior academics and directors of relevant organisations.Facts and opinions on politics of family planning programs.1. No incentive 2. $25 on return of questionnaire 3. $50 on return of questionnaire46/72 (63.9%) 57/77 (74.0%) 62/83 (74.7%)
Goodstadt 19772416 readers of Addictions magazine (US).Evaluation of Addictions magazine.1. No incentive375/604 (62.1%)
2. $0.25451/604 (74.7%)
3. Free book incentive403/604 (66.7%)
4. Promise of free book on return of completed questionnaire396/604 (65.6%)
Groeneman 1986600 people listed in the telephone directories of Toronto, Montreal, Vancouver and Winnipeg selected using ‘distinctive Jewish name sampling’ (Canada).Travel experiences and attitudes toward possible future trips.1. No incentive 2. $1 enclosed51/300 (17%) 102/300 (34%)
Hackler 1973218 mothers of ninth or tenth grade students living in one neighbourhood of Edmonton (US).Community cohesiveness.1. No incentive 2. $1 bill incentive43/109 (39.4%) 77/109 (70.6%)
Halpern 20021,200 general internists and family practitioners randomly selected from the American Medical Association’s master file of physicians (US).The comparative merits of placebo controlled versus active controlled trials of novel antihypertensive drugs.2×2×2 factorial design: $5 v $10 incentive Small v large outgoing envelope354/700 (50.6%) v 293/500 (58.6%)
Peppermint candy v none
Hancock 19406263 people listed on the personal tax records of the county assessors (US).Attitudes toward chain and independent stores.1. No incentive 2. $0.25 included366/3726 (9.8%) 463/960 (48.2%)
3. Promise of $0.25 on return of questionnaire204/1123 (18.2%)
4. Personal interview388/454 (85.5%)
Hansen RA 19802496 industrial safety engineers employed by firms that require employees to wear safety hard hats (US).Work related.1. No incentive 2. $0.25114/832 (13.7%) 308/832 (37.0%)
3. Ballpoint pen worth $0.25177/832 (21.3%)
Hopkins 1988507 professional school and public librarians (US).Attitudes and practices toward holding books in Spanish.1. No incentive 2. $1 incentive188/253 (74.3%) 218/254 (85.8%)
Hubbard 1988a2,000 residents of a major mid-western metropolitan area (US).Satisfaction with a range of banking and financial services.1. No incentive 2. Promise of $1 donation to charity of respondent’s choice162/400 (40.5%) 134/400 (33.5%)
3. $0.25 enclosed227/400 (56.8%)
4. $1 enclosed272/400 (68.0%)
5. Opportunity to win $200 cash prize207/400 (51.8%)
Hubbard 1988b3150 residents of a major mid-western metropolitan area (US).Satisfaction with a range of banking and financial services.1. No incentive 2. Pre-paid $0.25121/450 (26.9%) 182/450 (40.4%)
3. Pre-paid $1254/450 (56.4%)
4. Opportunity to win $50133/450 (29.6%)
5. Opportunity to win $100127/450 (28.2%)
6. Opportunity to win $150129/450 (28.7%)
7. Opportunity to win $200170/450 (37.8%)
Huck 1974200 students living in residence halls at the university of Tennessee (US).A variation of the Rokeach Dogmatism Scale.1. First mailing with $0.25 2. Second mailing (to non-respondents) with $0.2547/50 (94%) 46/50 (92%)
3. Third mailing (to non-respondents) with $0.2539/50 (78%)
4. First, second and third mailings without $0.2536/50 (72%)
James 1990844 cable television subscribers in Fairfax County, Virginia (US).Personal information.1. No incentive 2. $0.25148/168 (88.1%) 146/169 (86.4%)
3. $0.5145/168 (86.3%)
4. $1157/169 (92.9%)
5. $2163/170 (95.9%)
James 19921200 members of a national trade association of owners of construction subcontracting companies who were not currently enrolled in the association’s health insurance programme (US).Personal information about employees.1. No incentive 2. $1 cash 3. $5 cash 4. $5 cheque78/150 (52.0%) 96/150 (64.0%) 107/150 (71.3%) 101/150 (67.3%)
5. $10 cheque100/150 (66.7%)
6. $20 cheque119/150 (79.3%)
7. $40 cheque104/150 (69.3%)
8. $50 on return of completed questionnaire85/150 (56.7%)
Jobber 1988159 chief executives of building societies (UK).2×2 factorial design:23/79 (29.1%)
No incentive v 20 pence v
No booklet v booklet explaining survey included35/80 (43.8%)
John 19947549 cosmetologists aged 22–36 years (US).Recent health problems, pregnancy and childbirth.1. No incentive 2. $1 in first mailing327/443 (73.8%) 2257/2791 (80.9%)
3. $1 in second mailing3385/4315 (78.4%)
Kasprzyk 2001300 general internists listed on the American Medical Association files who spend time on direct patient care, dealing with STD diagnosis (US).STD diagnosis, treatment and control practices.3×2 factorial design: No incentive v $15 cash v $25 cash First class mailing v FedEx mailing25/100 (25%) v 67/100 (67%)
v
66/100 (66%)
Keown 1985a100 business executives (Japan).Attitudes to business risks.1. No incentive11/50 (22%)
2. $124/50 (48%)
Keown 1985b100 business executives (Hong Kong).Attitudes to business risks.1. No incentive6/50 (12%)
2. $10/50 (0%)
Kephart 1958500 women who had passed their Pennsylvania State Nursing Board exams (US).Attitudes to aspects of the nursing profession.1. No incentive 2. Penny52/100 (52%) 55/100 (55%)
3. Nickel54/100 (54%)
4. Dime57/100 (57%)
5. Quarter70/100 (70%)
Leung 20024850 physicians randomly selected from the full and limited registration lists of the Hong Kong Medical Council (Hong Kong).Computerisation of clinical and administrative tasks among physicians.1. No incentive 2. HK$10 cash 3. HK$20 cash281/1700 (16.5%) 9/50 (18.0%) 15/50 (30.0%)
4. HK$40 cash17/50 (34.0%)
5. Entry into HK$1000 lottery175/1000 (17.5%)
6. Entry into HK$2000 lottery197/1000 (19.7%)
7. Entry into HK$4000 lottery203/1000 (20.3%)
London 19901000 electronics design engineers (US).Use of components.1. No incentive24/500 (4.8%)
2. $1116/500 (23.2%)
Martinson 20004200 adolescents aged 14–17 years in the Minneapolis/St Paul metropolitan area (US).Behaviour and attitudes toward smoking.1. No incentive 2. $2 included with questionnaire483/1050 (46.0%) 650/1050 (61.9%)
3. $15 on completion and return of questionnaire721/1050 (68.7%)
4. Promise of entry into ten drawings for $200 cash prizes on completion and return of questionnaire589/1050 (56.1%)
McConochie 198511057 men aged 18–34 (US).Radio listening.1. $0.502312/5249 (44.0%)
2. $21448/2874 (50.4%)
3. $51660/2934 (56.6%)
Mizes 1984200 physicians specialising in allergy, randomly selected from all physicians listed under allergy or allergy/immunology in the telephone directory yellow pages of major metropolitan areas (US).The incidence, treatment and success of treatment of rhinitis medicamentosa.1. No incentive; Answer sheet on postcard 2. $1 cheque; answer sheet on postcard 3. $5 cheque; answer sheet on postcard 4. $1 cheque; answer on bank cheque21/40 (52.5%) 29/40 (72.5%) 29/40 (72.5%) 21/40 (52.5%)
5. $5 cheque; answer on bank cheque29/40 (72.5%)
Paolillo 1984400 business professionals from the mid-west (US).1. No incentive36/100 (36.0%)
2. $1 enclosed with questionnaire65/100 (65.0%)
3. $2 promised on return of questionnaire41/100 (41.0%)
4. Entry into a lottery for a cash prize promised on return of questionnaire33/100 (33.0%)
Parkes 20002561 adults aged 20–74 years who were controls in a Canadian case-control study of cancer (Canada).Lifetime residential and occupational history, smoking, diet, physical activity and use of medication.1. No incentive 2. $2 sent with questionnaire 3. $5 sent with questionnaire519/838 (61.9%) 623/856 (72.8%) 669/867 (77.2%)
Peck 19815850 men and women who had been high school juniors in spring 1973 (US).Work experience and career plans.1. No incentive 2. Prepaid $3566/1462 (38.7%) 1882/2918 (64.5%)
3. $3 on return of questionnaire773/1470 (52.6%)
Perneger 19931235 young adults enrolled in various insurance plans (Geneva, Switzerland).Health status.1. No incentive 2. Reminder card243/311 (78.1%) 252/309 (81.6)
3. Promise of 10 Swiss francs260/310 (83.9%)
4. Reminder card and promise of 10 Swiss francs252/305 (82.6%)
Pressley 1977280 marketing research directors (US).2×2×4 factorial design:45/140 (32.1%)
No incentive v Dime v
Cartoons v No cartoons61/140 (43.6%)
Yellow v Blue v Green v White questionnaire
Roberts 20001000 English women aged 40–65 years (UK).Menopause services in the north west of England.2×2 factorial design: No incentive v payment of £5 on response420/750 (56.0%) v
No lottery incentive v entry into lottery for £50 on response169/250 (67.6%)
Robertson 1978450 people systematically selected from the Denver Metropolitan area phone directory (US).1. No incentive 2. Promise of $1 cash on return of questionnaire35/150 (23.3%) 39/150 (26.0%)
3. Promise of $1 donation to charity on return of questionnaire62/150 (41.3%)
Shackleton 198085 partially sighted school leavers aged 17–20 years who had left schools for the visually handicapped during the previous academic year (UK).Occupational experiences during the first year after leaving school.2×2 factorial design: No incentive v £1 offered No examination v Previous examination38/42 (90.5%) v 40/43 (93.0%)
Shaw 20011800 HealthSystem Minnesota enrolees aged 20–80 years (US).Quality of life, anxiety, depression, morbidity and health care utilisation.1. $2 2. $5590/900 (65.6%) 649/900 (72.1%)
Skinner 1984300 marketing professors (Canada).Needs of instructors for an introductory marketing text.1. No incentive 2. $1 pre-paid23/60 (38.3%) 30/60 (50.0%)
3. $1 on return of completed questionnaire; Respondent identified20/60 (33.3%)
4. $1 on return of completed questionnaire; respondent not identified15/60 (25.0%)
5. $1 promised to charity16/60 (26.7%)
Spry 19893388 residences listed in the Haines Directory who had not responded to a questionnaire (San Diego, US).Health and physical activity.1. No incentive 2. Promise of $5 on return of completed questionnaire323/3114 (10.4%) 21/96 (21.9%)
3. Promise of $1 on return of completed questionnaire12/90 (13.3%)
4. $1 bill enclosed11/88 (12.5%)
Tullar 1979200 large manufacturing firms (US).Product development.2×2 factorial design:50/100 (50.0%)
No incentive v $0.10 v
No follow-up v Follow-up78/100 (78.0%)
VanGeest 2001873 physicians randomly selected from the American Medical Association’s master file of all practising physicians (US).Attitudes toward, and responses to, utilisation review pressures.1. $5 cash 2. $10 cash 3. $20 cash176/292 (60.3%) 198/291 (68.0%) 189/290 (65.2%)
Warriner 19963044 households listed in the Grand River Watershed region of south-western Ontario (Canada).Environmental issues.4×5 factorial design: No monetary incentive v Canadian $2 v $5 v $10219/347 (63.1%) v
No offer to make a charitable donation v $2 offer v $5 offer v $10 offer v Lottery (five prizes of Can$200)1441/2007 (71.8%) v 270/351 (76.9%)
v
263/339 (77.6%)
Weltzien 1986942 people who had terminated from mental health treatment centres (US).Client satisfaction.1. No incentive 2. $0.0286/471 (18.3%) 115/471 (24.4%)
Wiseman 1973464 residents in a state-wide telephone listings, Massachusetts (US).Attitudes and opinions toward the Massachusetts State lottery.2×2×2×2 factorial design No incentive v $0.1090/232 (38.8%) v
No follow-up v Postcard follow-up 3 days after initial mailing109/232 (47.0%)
Stamped v Business reply return envelope
No offer of survey results v offer of survey results
Wotruba 1966150 urban household residents (US).1. No incentive9/50 (18%)
2. $0.25 with questionnaire20/50 (40%)
3. $0.50 promised on return of questionnaire10/50 (20%)
Zusman 1987371 undergraduate transfer students (US).1. No incentive74/171 (43.3%)
2. $1 sent with first mailing122/200 (61.0%)