Table 2

Education specific age adjusted prevalence rates* of self rated health less than good and their odds ratios† and relative indices of inequalities (RII)‡ among Korean men and women aged 20–59: 1989, 1992, 1995, 1999 Social Statistics Survey of Korea’s National Statistical Office

Elementary or lessMiddleHighCollege or higherTotal
*Age adjusted prevalence rates were calculated with age adjustment to five year age groups according to the direct method with distribution of 1999 data; †odds ratios were computed using logistic regression. “college or higher” groups was the referent (1.0); ‡relative indices of inequalities were computed using logistic regression analyses.
Men aged 3059
1989
Number of the surveyed520043577415333120303
Self rated health less than good (n)25221954290011708546
Age adjusted prevalence rates (95% CI)45.5 (44.1 to 46.8)45.1 (43.6 to 46.6)40.6 (39.5 to 41.7)35.9 (34.2 to 37.5)42.2 (41.5 to 42.9)
Odds ratio (95% CI)1.51 (1.38 to 1.66)1.46 (1.33 to 1.61)1.20 (1.10 to 1.31)1.00
RII (95% CI)1.67 (1.51 to 1.86)
1992
Number of the surveyed459044248502418821704
Self rated health less than good (n)261023043997165910570
Age adjusted prevalence rates (95% CI)53.0 (51.5 to 54.4)51.8 (50.4 to 53.3)47.9 (46.9 to 49.0)40.4 (38.9 to 41.8)48.9 (48.2 to 49.5)
Odds ratio (95% CI)1.73 (1.58 to 1.89)1.56 (1.43 to 1.70)1.33 (1.24 to 1.44)1.00
RII (95% CI)1.86 (1.68 to 2.05)
1995
Number of the surveyed348839409275492621629
Self rated health less than good (n)214222194813225711431
Age adjusted prevalence rates (95% CI)58.6 (57.0 to 60.3)55.2 (53.7 to 56.8)52.6 (51.6 to 53.6)46.3 (44.9 to 47.7)53.0 (52.3 to 53.7)
Odds ratio (95% CI)1.63 (1.49 to 1.79)1.42 (1.31 to 1.55)1.25 (1.17 to 1.34)1.00
RII (95% CI)1.71 (1.55 to 1.89)
1999
Number of the surveyed226828848406481818376
Self rated health less than good (n)14971765432921359726
Age adjusted prevalence rates (95% CI)60.3 (58.3 to 62.3)59.0 (57.2 to 60.8)52.1 (51.0 to 53.2)44.5 (43.1 to 45.9)52.9 (52.2 to 53.6)
Odds ratio (95% CI)2.09 (1.87 to 2.33)1.79 (1.63 to 1.98)1.30 (1.21 to 1.40)1.00
RII (95% CI)2.26 (2.02 to 2.52)
RII trend (p value) 0.001
Women aged 3059
1989
Number of the surveyed1044149824602106321088
Self rated health less than good (n)63742881252655612337
Age adjusted prevalence rates (95% CI)57.8 (56.9 to 58.8)60.4 (59.1 to 61.8)59.3 (57.9 to 60.7)53.0 (50.0 to 56.0)58.6 (58.0 to 59.3)
Odds ratio (95% CI)1.07 (0.94 to 1.23)1.20 (1.05 to 1.37)1.12 (0.98 to 1.29)1.00
RII (95% CI)0.96 (0.86 to 1.07)
1992
Number of the surveyed938755845938151922428
Self rated health less than good (n)65973671365989514822
Age adjusted prevalence rates (95% CI)67.0 (66.0 to 67.9)67.8 (66.5 to 69.0)63.7 (62.5 to 64.9)58.9 (56.4 to 61.4)66.2 (65.5 to 66.8)
Odds ratio (95% CI)1.26 (1.12 to 1.42)1.25 (1.11 to 1.41)1.12 (1.00 to 1.25)1.00
RII (95% CI)1.21 (1.09 to 1.35)
1995
Number of the surveyed721954197373204822059
Self rated health less than good (n)523237294646122114828
Age adjusted prevalence rates (95% CI)68.2 (67.1 to 69.3)69.2 (68.0 to 70.4)65.3 (64.2 to 66.3)60.5 (58.3 to 62.6)67.4 (66.8 to 68.0)
Odds ratio (95% CI)1.34 (1.20 to 1.50)1.34 (1.20 to 1.49)1.13 (1.02 to 1.25)1.00
RII (95% CI)1.35 (1.21 to 1.50)
1999
Number of the surveyed476741447610230718828
Self rated health less than good (n)371030254780136012875
Age adjusted prevalence rates (95% CI)73.5 (72.3 to 74.8)72.5 (71.2 to 73.9)65.3 (64.3 to 66.4)59.8 (57.7 to 61.8)68.4 (67.7 to 69.0)
Odds ratio (95% CI)1.81 (1.60 to 2.04)1.60 (1.43 to 1.79)1.14 (1.03 to 1.25)1.00
RII (95% CI)1.94 (1.72 to 2.19)
RII trend (p value) <0.0001