Table 1

 Baseline characteristics of the sample of fatigued employees (n = 1143) classified according to outcome (caseness) at 44 month follow up

VariableGroup 1Group 2Group 3p Values for differences between the groups†
CFS-like cases (n = 94)Non-CFS fatigue cases (n = 457)No fatigue cases (n = 592)1 v 21 v 32 v 3
*p Value is significant at p<0.05. †Pairwise comparisons for continuous and dichotomous variables, overall comparison for categorical variable educational level. CFS-like cases, fatigued employees at baseline who met CFS research criteria at follow up; non-CFS fatigue cases, fatigued employees at baseline who were (still) fatigued but did not meet CFS research criteria at follow up; no fatigue cases, fatigued employees at baseline who were no longer fatigued at follow up.
Demographic
Age, mean (SD)43.8 (7.5)41.2 (7.9)41.3 (7.9)0.009*0.010*1.000
Male sex, number (%)61 (65)336 (73)397 (67)0.0900.6790.024*
Educational level
    High, number (%)18 (20)187 (42)231 (40)0.000*
    Medium, number (%)45 (48)184 (41)250 (43)
    Low, number (%)30 (32)77 (17)100 (17)
Continuous, mean (SD)
Fatigue severity (scale 35–56)44.7 (5.9)42.7 (5.6)40.6 (5.0)0.005*0.000*0.000*
Emotional exhaustion (scale 0–6)3.5 (1.2)3.0 (1.2)2.6 (1.1)0.005*0.000*0.000*
Psychological distress (scale 0–12)5.5 (4.2)4.4 (3.8)3.6 (3.6)0.022*0.000*0.002*
Anxious mood (scale 3–12)6.1 (1.8)6.0 (1.7)5.5 (1.5)1.0000.002*0.000*
Dichotomous, number of cases (%)
Depressed mood34 (37)106 (24)120 (21)0.009*0.001*0.266
Physical attribution of fatigue44 (47)157 (34)200 (34)0.022*0.014*0.847
Psychological attribution of fatigue45 (48)240 (53)282 (48)0.4120.9660.117
No specific attribution of fatigue21 (23)89 (19)111 (19)0.5270.4120.767
Self rated health (good)42 (45)256 (57)431 (73)0.045*0.000*0.000*
Health complaints71 (76)252 (55)283 (48)0.000*0.000*0.022*
Absent from work9 (10)33 (7)37 (6)0.4340.2310.532