Logistic regression analysis: Combined effect of effort-reward imbalance and job strain on risk of myocardial infarction (multivariate odds ratios (95% CI), number of exposed)
| Men | Women | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| adjustment (*) | adjustment (†) | adjustment (*) | adjustment (†) | |
| *Adjusted for effort-reward-ratio or overcommitment respectively and hypertension, total cholesterol, history of diabetes, family history of CHD; †Additionally adjusted for smoking (non-smoker, ex smoker, current smoker), lack of physical exercise, BMI. | ||||
| Model I | ||||
| neither effort-reward-ratio >1 nor job strain present | 1.00 n=805 | 1.00 n=796 | 1.00 n=238 | 1.00 n=235 |
| effort-reward-ratio > 1 but job strain absent | 1.31 (0.87 to 1.97) n=115 | 1.42 (0.92 to 2.18) n=114 | 0.49 (0.18 to 1.37) n=23 | 0.50 (0.17 to 1.44) n=23 |
| job strain present but effort-reward-ratio ≤ 1 | 1.28 (0.93 to 1.74) n=216 | 1.30 (0.94 to 1.82) n=214 | 1.45 (0.90 to 2.34) n=124 | 1.31 (0.78 to 2.20) n=124 |
| effort-reward-ratio >1 AND job strain present | 1.75 (1.18 to 2.59) n=132 | 2.02 (1.34 to 3.07) n=130 | 1.53 (0.77 to 3.03) n=50 | 1.05 (0.50 to 2.19) n=50 |
| Model II | ||||
| neither overcommitment nor job strain present | 1.00 n=683 | 1.00 n=675 | 1.00 n=196 | 1.00 n=196 |
| overcommitment present but job strain absent | 1.25 (0.92 to 1.71) n=237 | 1.20 (0.86 to 1.66) n=235 | 1.52 (0.82 to 2.03) n=62 | 1.19 (0.62 to 2.30) n=62 |
| job strain present but overcommitment absent | 1.36 (0.97 to 1.89) n=196 | 1.51 (1.05 to 2.15) n=193 | 1.62 (0.95 to 2.76) n=102 | 1.23 (0.69 to 2.20) n=102 |
| overcommitment AND job strain present | 1.49 (1.01 to 2.18) n=152 | 1.31 (0.88 to 1.97) n=151 | 2.47 (1.33 to 4.59) n=72 | 2.19 (1.11 to 4.28) n=72 |