Table 4

Quality assurance for screening mammography programmes represented in the International Breast Cancer Screening Network: Outcome Components, 1998

% Population screenedMonitor/assess
Set goalMonitor goalTechnical recallSet maximum recall4-150Follow up careAdverse eventsClient satisfactionCancer detection rateProgramme improvement
National programmes
AustraliaYesYesYesYes (3%)YesYesYes4-1 YesYes
FinlandNoNoYesYesYesYesYes
IcelandYesYesNoYesNoYesYesYes
IsraelYesYesNoYesYesYesYesYes4-1
LuxembourgYesYesYesNoYesYesYesCan beYes
NetherlandsYesYesYesNoYesYesYesYesYes4-1
United KingdomYesYesYesYes (3%)YesYesYes4-1 YesYes4-1
State, provincial, local programmes
Established
BelgiumYesNoNoYesYesYesCan beYes
Canada4-152 YesYesYesYes (2–5%)NoNoYesYesYes4-1
DenmarkNoYesNoYesYesYes4-1 YesYes4-1
France4-152 YesYesYesYes (2%)YesYesYesYesYes
Italy4-152 YesYesYesNoYesYesYesYesYes
NorwayYesYesYesYes (2%)YesYesYesYesYes4-1
PortugalNoYesYes (1%)YesYesYesYesYes4-1
SpainYesYesYesNoYesNoYesYesYes4-1
Sweden4-152 YesYesYesNoYesYesYesYesYes
Pilot
Germany4-151 YesYesYesYes (3–5%)YesYesYes4-1 YesYes4-1
GreeceYesYesYesYes (3%)YesYesYes4-1 YesYes4-1
HungaryYesYesYesYes (5%)YesYesNoYesYes
JapanYesYesNoYesNoNoYesNo
UruguayNoYesNoYesNoYesYesYes4-1
Registry programme
United States4-2 YesYesYesNoYes4-3 Yes4-3 Yes4-1 YesYes
  • 4-150 For technical reasons.

  • 4-1 Routinely.

  • 4-2 The Mammography Quality Standards Act (MQSA) requires all mammography facilities to conduct medical outcomes audits, in which mammography results are systematically collected and compared with outcomes data. Individual facilities determine which outcomes to examine.

  • 4-3 Required of all mammography facilities in the US under the Mammography Quality Standards Act (MQSA).

  • 4-151 Denotes programme in implementation.

  • 4-152 Denotes countries with a decentralised (subnational) organisation of screening mammography, but in which the totality of organised screening programmes attains national coverage.