A comparison of foetal SAR in three sets of pregnant female models

Phys Med Biol. 2009 May 7;54(9):2755-67. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/9/011. Epub 2009 Apr 15.

Abstract

This paper compares the foetal SAR in the HPA hybrid mathematical phantoms with the 26-week foetal model developed at the National Institute of Information and Communications Technology, Tokyo, and the set of 13-, 26- and 38-week boundary representation models produced at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. FDTD calculations are performed at a resolution of 2 mm for a plane wave with a vertically aligned electric field incident upon the body from the front, back and two sides from 20 MHz to 3 GHz under isolated conditions. The external electric field values required to produce the ICNIRP public exposure localized restriction of 2 W kg(-1) when averaged over 10 g of the foetus are compared with the ICNIRP reference levels.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Absorption
  • Female
  • Fetus / physiology
  • Fetus / radiation effects*
  • Gestational Age
  • Humans
  • International Agencies / standards
  • Models, Biological*
  • Mothers
  • Phantoms, Imaging
  • Pregnancy
  • Radiation Protection / standards
  • Reference Values
  • Temperature