Elsevier

The Lancet

Volume 360, Issue 9332, 17 August 2002, Pages 565-567
The Lancet

Viewpoint
Addressing health inequalities

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09713-1Get rights and content

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (19)

  • Inequalities in health: report of an independent inquiry chaired by Sir Donald Acheson

    (1998)
  • Our healthier nation

    (1998)
  • Health inequalities: breaking the link between poverty and ill health

  • Press release: reference 2001/0511

  • Diderichsen F. Policies for health equity: an ethical and epidemiological framework and targets for a new national...
  • Sihto M. Finnish national strategies to reduce socio-economic inequalities in health. In Oliver A. Health care priority...
  • JA Auerbach et al.

    Improving health: it doesn't take a revolution

    (2000)
  • International Society for Equity in Health

  • J Fitzpatrick et al.

    Mapping health inequalities across London: executive summary

    (2001)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (43)

  • Learning lessons for avoiding the inadvertent exclusion of communities from smart city projects

    2020, Shaping Smart for Better Cities: Rethinking and Shaping Relationships between Urban Space and Digital Technologies
  • Addressing equitable health of vulnerable groups ininternational health documents

    2013, Alter
    Citation Excerpt :

    and accessible health services. The framework for analyses, EquiFrame, was based on CCs of disability as developed by Turnbull et al. (Reichard, Sacco, & Turnbull, 2004; Turnbull et al., 2002; Stowe & Turnbull, 2001), the right to the highest attainable standard of health and in particular the need to address health inequalities (Braveman & Gruskin, 2003; Oliver, Healey, & Le Grand, 2002), and current thinking in health policy analysis more broadly (Gilson et al., 2008; Russel & Gilson, 2006). Development and application of EquiFrame is part of a larger study, EquitAble, on accessibility and quality of health care for VGs in poor countries, and funded by EU FP 7.

  • Measuring socioeconomic inequality in health, health care and health financing by means of rank-dependent indices: A recipe for good practice

    2011, Journal of Health Economics
    Citation Excerpt :

    Second, we discuss and prove several of the properties of rank-dependent indices for bounded variables that were presented in Erreygers (2009a,b), and provide – if possible – the corresponding properties for unbounded variables. Third, we revisit the discussion of Erreygers and Wagstaff and show its relation with the long-lasting debate in epidemiology (and health economics) on measuring absolute versus relative health differences (among others Wagstaff et al., 1991; Mackenbach and Kunst, 1997; Oliver et al., 2002; Regidor, 2004; Avendano Pabon, 2006; Harper and Lynch, 2007; Mackenbach et al., 2008; Regidor et al., 2009; Harper et al., 2010). We show that a lot of confusion derives from defining absolute and relative inequality on the raw indicators.

  • Major reduction in AIDS-mortality inequalities after HAART: The importance of absolute differences in evaluating interventions

    2009, Social Science and Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    In their opinion, these measures are consistent with the use of ratio measures in epidemiologic research. However, a number of authors have noted the need to use both absolute and relative measures (Harper & Lynch, 2006; Mackenbach & Kunst, 1997; Oliver et al., 2002; Regidor, 2004). It seems clear that, from the point of view of evaluation of public health interventions, the use of absolute differences, which show the number of deaths or cases avoided, may sometimes be more appropriate than the use of relative differences, which reveal how effective an intervention is in different socioeconomic groups.

  • On absolute socioeconomic health inequality comparisons

    2023, European Journal of Health Economics
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text