Elsevier

Annals of Epidemiology

Volume 6, Issue 1, January 1996, Pages 12-20
Annals of Epidemiology

Original report
The shape of the relationship between income and mortality in the United States: Evidence from the National Longitudinal Mortality Study

https://doi.org/10.1016/1047-2797(95)00090-9Get rights and content

Abstract

A follow-up study based on a large national sample was used to examine differences in the welle-stablished inverse gradient between income and mortality at different income levels. The study showed the income-mortality gradient to be much smaller at high income levels than at low to moderate income levels in the working age (25 to 64 years) and elderly (over 65 years) populations for men and women both before and after adjustment for other socioeconomic variables. In addition, a much larger gradient existed for working age women at extreme poverty levels than for those women at low to moderate income levels. The income-mortality gradient was much smaller in the elderly than in the working age population. The study also examined the ability of several different mathematic functions of income to delineate the relationship between income and mortality. The study suggested that the health benefits associated with increased income diminish as income increases.

References (33)

  • CH Slater et al.

    The independent contributions of socioeconomic status and health practices to health status

    Prev Med

    (1985)
  • GB Rodgers

    Income and inequality as determinants of mortality: An international cross-section analysis

    Popul Stud

    (1979)
  • RG Wilkinson

    Income distribution and life expectancy

    BMJ

    (1992)
  • RG Wilkinson

    National mortality rates: The impact of inequality?

    Am J Public Health

    (1992)
  • RG Wilkinson

    Income and mortality

  • EM Kitagawa et al.

    Differential Mortality in the United States

  • PD Sorlie et al.

    Mortality by economic, demographic, and social characteristics; the National Longitudinal Mortality Study

    Am J Public Health

    (1995)
  • M Blaxter

    Health and Lifestyles

  • S Schwartz

    The fallacy of the ecological fallacy: The potential misuse of a concept and the consequences

    Am J Public Health

    (1994)
  • M Susser

    The logic in ecological: The logic of analysis

    Am J Public Health

    (1994)
  • S Arber

    Social class, non-employment, and chronic illness: Continuing the inequalities in health debate

    BMJ

    (1987)
  • RG Wilkinson

    Income distribution and mortality: A ‘natural’ experiment

    Sociol Health Illness

    (1990)
  • E Rogot et al.

    A Mortality Study of One Million Persons by Demographic, Social, and Economic Factors: 1979–1981 Follow-up

  • E Rogot et al.

    A Mortality Study of 1.3 Million Persons by Demographic, Social, and Economic Factors: 1979–1985 Follow-up

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census

    The Current Population Survey: Design and Methodology

  • National Center for Health Statistics

    National Death Index Users Manual

  • Cited by (248)

    • Income inequality and non-communicable disease mortality and morbidity in Brazil States: a longitudinal analysis 2002-2017

      2021, The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
      Citation Excerpt :

      There is little knowledge from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) on the relationship between income inequalities and population health, which is vital as LMICs have experienced rapid economic growth in recent years and often have weak health and social protection systems. Increases in income have a well-established beneficial effect on population health [5]. This association, however, is not homogenous as income increases for the poor deliver greater health benefits than increases for the rich [5].

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    The views expressed in this manuscript are attributable to the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the US Census Bureau.

    View full text