Attributions for smoking behavior: Comparing smokers with nonsmokers and predicting smokers' cigarette consumption

https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(83)90034-XGet rights and content

Abstract

A revised version of J. H. Coan's (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1973, 26, 86–104) Smoking Survey was completed by smokers and nonsmokers in two studies. The Revised Smoking Survey was factor analyzed and discriminant function analysis was used to compare smokers and nonsmokers on the resulting nine smoking motives. Nonsmokers gave significantly more agreement to items on the Revised Smoking Survey comprising the following smoking motives: Sophistication, Health-Nuisance, Addiction, Stimulation, Sensorimotor Pleasure. Smokers gave significantly more agreement than nonsmokers to only one smoking motive: Relaxation. Multiple correlations between smoking motives and selfreported cigarette consumption were .754 (Study 1) and .670 (Study 2). The most important motives predicting cigarette consumption were Addiction and Affective Smoking. Results were related to attributional theories of arousal and to research measuring people's (in)ability to accurately explain their behaviors. It was recommended that cigarette smoking cessation programs should provide smokers with skills for relaxation and for coping with withdrawal.

References (36)

  • V.J. Adesso et al.

    A behavioral test of a smoking typology

    Addictive Behaviors

    (1978)
  • J.A. Best et al.

    A situation-specific model for smoking behavior

    Addictive Behaviors

    (1978)
  • J. Flaxman

    Affect-management and habit mechanisms in the modification of smoking behavior

    Addictive Behaviors

    (1979)
  • R. Joffe et al.

    A validity test of the Reasons for Smoking Scale

    Addictive Behaviors

    (1981)
  • J.H. Burn

    Action of nicotine on the heart

    Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

    (1960)
  • J.H. Coan

    Personality variables associated with cigarette smoking

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1973)
  • J.R. Eiser et al.

    Smokers, non-smokers, and the attribution of addiction

    British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology

    (1977)
  • J.R. Eiser et al.

    Smokers' and non-smokers' attributions about smoking: A case of actor-observer differences?

    British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology

    (1978)
  • C. Elliott et al.

    A multiple-component treatment approach to smoking reduction

    Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

    (1978)
  • C. Frith

    Smoking behavior and its relation to the smoker's immediate experience

    British Journal of Social and Clincial Psychology

    (1971)
  • D. Horn

    Smoker's self testing kit

  • F.F. Ikard et al.

    A scale to differentiate between types of smoking as related to the management of affect

    International Journal of Addictions

    (1969)
  • F.F. Ikard et al.

    The experience of affect as a determinant of smoking behavior: A series of validity studies

    Journal of Abnormal Psychology

    (1973)
  • E.E. Jones et al.

    The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior

    (1971)
  • C.L. Kleinke

    Self-labeling of bodily states

    JSAS Catalogue of Selected Documents in Psychology

    (1977)
  • C.L. Kleinke

    Self-perception: The psychology of personal awareness

    (1978)
  • H.A. Lando

    Successful treatment of smokers with a broad-spectrum behavioral approach

    Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

    (1977)
  • H. Leventhal et al.

    Pleasure, addiction, and habit: Factors in verbal report or factors in smoking behavior?

    Journal of Abnormal Psychology

    (1976)
  • Cited by (23)

    • The role of cognitive attributions for smoking in subsequent smoking progression and regression among adolescents in China

      2013, Addictive Behaviors
      Citation Excerpt :

      Therefore, a health education message that attempts to dispel the myth that smoking has social benefits would not resonate with this smoker, who believes that he/she smokes to relieve stress. Attribution research has been conducted to address cigarette smoking, a public health problem worldwide, among adolescents (Allbutt, Amos, & Cunningham-Burley, 1995; Aloise-Young, Hennigan, & Graham, 1996; Barton, Chassin, Presson, & Sherman, 1982; Cronan, Conway, & Kaszas, 1991; Kleinke, Staneski, & Meeker, 1983; McGee & Stanton, 1993; Rugkasa et al., 2001; Sarason, Mankowski, Peterson, & Dinh, 1992; Stanton, Mahalski, McGee, & Silva, 1993; Treacy et al., 2007). However, although previous attribution studies have identified self-reported cognitive attributions for smoking, they did not report whether those attributions were truly correlated with actual smoking behaviors, nor did they examine whether the attributions influenced future smoking behaviors.

    • Do cognitive attributions for smoking predict subsequent smoking development?

      2012, Addictive Behaviors
      Citation Excerpt :

      To design more effective smoking prevention and cessation program, it is better to not only understand cognitive attributions and their associations with current smoking behaviors, but also understand their influences on subsequent smoking behaviors and the underlying mechanisms of those influences, so that relevant issues can be addressed in health communication curricula. Most previous attribution studies have been conducted in western countries (Berlin et al., 2003; Eiser, Sutton, & Wober, 1977; Jenks, 1994b; Kleinke et al., 1983; Sarason et al., 1992). Few have been conducted in China, where smoking has caused more than 600 million people, 72% of the total population including 60% of female non-smokers of childbearing age, to be either directly or indirectly exposed to cigarette smoke (Yang et al., 1999).

    • Cognitive attributions for smoking among adolescents in China

      2010, Addictive Behaviors
      Citation Excerpt :

      Several studies have identified cognitive attributions for smoking by asking people directly why they and other people initiate, maintain, or become addicted to smoking (Allbutt, Amos, & Cunningham-Burley, 1995; Rugkasa et al., 2001; Sarason, Mankowski, Peterson, & Dinh, 1992; Treacy et al., 2007). However, most of these studies have not assessed the relative importance of attributions to the individual, and most have not linked cognitive attributions with actual smoking behaviors to determine which are most influential (Kleinke, Staneski, & Meeker, 1983). A comprehensive investigation about cognitive attributions, their relative importance, and their associations with actual smoking behaviors could provide a better understanding about how people rationalize their decisions about smoking, which could be helpful in the design of more effective health communications for smoking cessation and prevention.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This research was presented at the meeting of the Southeastern Psychological Association, Washington, D.C., 1980.

    View full text