Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Disparities in injury morbidity among young adults in the USA: individual and contextual determinants
  1. Susanne Schmidt1,
  2. P Johnelle Sparks2
  1. 1Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA
  2. 2Department of Demography, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Susanne Schmidt, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio 78229, Texas; schmidts4{at}uthscsa.edu

Abstract

Background Injuries have been recognised as important public health concerns, particularly among adolescents and young adults. Few studies have examined injuries using a multilevel perspective that addresses individual socioeconomic status (SES) and health behaviours and local socioeconomic conditions in early adolescence. We offer a conceptual framework incorporating these various components.

Methods We test our conceptual framework using population data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health Wave 4 when respondents were young adults and linked them to contextual level data from when they were middle-schoolers. We use logistic and multilevel regression models to examine self-reported injury risk in young adults by sex (n=14 356).

Results Logistic regression models showed that men were more likely to experience serious injuries than women (OR 1.75, P<0.0001), but SES and health behaviours operated differently by sex. In stratified models, men with lower education had consistently higher injury risk, while only women with some college had increased injury risk (OR 1.40, P=0.0089) than college graduates. Low household income (OR 1.54, P=0.0011) and unemployment (OR 1.50, P=0.0008) increased female injury risk, but was non-significant for men. Alcohol consumption increased injury risk for both sexes, while only female smokers had elevated injury risk (OR 1.38, P=0.0154). In multilevel models, significant county-level variation was only observed for women. Women living in disadvantaged neighbourhoods during adolescence had increased injury risk (OR 1.001, P<0.0001).

Conclusions These findings highlight the importance of investigating mechanisms that link early-life contextual conditions to early adult SES and health behaviours and their linkage to injury risk, particularly for women.

  • injuries
  • SES
  • health behaviors
  • adolescents
  • multilevel modelling
  • national longitudinal study of adolescent health

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Funding SS is supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, through Grant KL2 TR001118.

  • Disclaimer The content of this project is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Correction notice This article has been corrected since it published Online First. The author affiliations have been corrected.

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.