Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Association between income trajectories in childhood and psychiatric disorder: a Swedish population-based study
Free
  1. Emma Björkenstam1,2,
  2. Siwei Cheng3,
  3. Bo Burström2,
  4. Anne R Pebley1,
  5. Charlotte Björkenstam4,5,6,
  6. Kyriaki Kosidou7,8
  1. 1Department of Community Health Sciences, Fielding School of Public Health and California Center for Population Research, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
  2. 2Division of Social Medicine, Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
  3. 3Department of Sociology, New York University, New York, New York, USA
  4. 4Department of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
  5. 5Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
  6. 6Department of Sociology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
  7. 7Division of Public Health Epidemiology, Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
  8. 8Center for Epidemiology and Community Medicine, Stockholm County Council, Stockholm, Sweden
  1. Correspondence to Dr Emma Björkenstam, Division of Social Medicine, Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm SE-171 77, Sweden; emma.bjorkenstam{at}ki.se

Abstract

Background Childhood family income variation is an understudied aspect of households' economic context that may have distinct consequences for children. We identified trajectories of childhood family income over a 12-year period, and examined associations between these trajectories and later psychiatric disorders, among individuals born in Sweden between 1987 and 1991 (n=534 294).

Methods We used annual income data between the ages of 3–14 years and identified 5 trajectories (2 high-income upward, 1 downward and 2 low-income upward trajectories). Psychiatric disorders in the follow-up period after age 15 were defined from International Classification of Disease (ICD)-codes in a nationwide patient register. Multiadjusted risks for all psychiatric disorders, as well as for specific psychiatric diagnoses, were calculated as HRs with 95% CIs.

Results Of the 5 identified income trajectories, the constant low and the downward trajectories were particularly associated with later psychiatric disorder. Children with these trajectories had increased risks for psychiatric disorder, including mood, anxiety, psychotic disorders and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. The association remained, even after adjusting for important variables including parental psychiatric disorder. In contrast, the relationship was reversed for eating disorders, for which children in higher income trajectories had elevated risks.

Conclusions Findings show that children growing up in a household characterised by low or decreasing family income have an increased risk for psychiatric disorder. Continued work is needed to reduce socioeconomic inequalities in psychiatric disorders. Policies and interventions for psychiatric disorders should consider the socioeconomic background of the family as an important risk or protective factor.

  • CHILD HEALTH
  • LONGITUDINAL STUDIES
  • MENTAL HEALTH
  • POVERTY
  • Social and life-course epidemiology

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors EB, SC and ARP originated the idea. EB and SC analysed the data. EB wrote the manuscript draft. All authors contributed to the interpretation of the results and to the writing of the final article.

  • Funding This study was supported by a grant from the Swedish Society for Medical Research (CB), Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research (grant number 2013-2729, EB).

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Ethics approval This project has been reviewed and approved by the Regional Ethical Review Board of Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden (dnrs: 2010/1185-31/1 and 2013/1118-32).

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.