Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Assessing the effect of regional deprivation on mortality avoiding compositional bias: a natural experiment
  1. Katharina Reiss1,
  2. Ursula Berger1,2,
  3. Volker Winkler3,
  4. Sven Voigtländer1,4,
  5. Heiko Becher3,
  6. Oliver Razum1
  1. 1Department of Epidemiology & International Public Health, Bielefeld School of Public Health (BiSPH), Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
  2. 2Department for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology (IBE), Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
  3. 3Unit Epidemiology and Biostatistics (EpiStat), Institute of Public Health, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
  4. 4Section Quality of Health Care, Health Economics, Health System Analysis (GE6), Bavarian Health and Food Safety Authority (LGL), Erlangen, Germany
  1. Correspondence to Dr Sven Voigtländer, Section Quality of Health Care, Health Economics, Health System Analysis (GE6), Bavarian Health and Food Safety Authority (LGL), Eggenreuther Weg 43, 91058, Erlangen, Germany; sven.voigtlaender{at}lgl.bayern.de

Abstract

Background and objective We assessed the effect of regional deprivation on individual mortality by making use of a natural experiment: we followed up ethnic German resettlers from Former Soviet Union countries who were quasi-randomly distributed across the socioeconomically heterogeneous counties of Germany's federal state North Rhine-Westphalia (NRW).

Methods We used data from the retrospective cohort study ‘AMOR’ on the mortality of resettlers in NRW (n=34 393). Based on the postcode of the last known residence we linked study participants to the 54 counties of NRW, which were aggregated in six deprivation clusters. Mortality rates and standardised mortality ratios (SMRs) were calculated for each cluster. After a mean follow-up of 10 years, 2580 resettlers were deceased.

Results For male and female cohort members, mortality rates and SMRs were highest in the cluster ‘poverty poles’ (SMR men: 1.21, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.41; SMR women: 1.17, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.37), whereas they were lowest in the cluster ‘prospering regions and suburban counties’ (SMR women: 0.86, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.05) as well as in the cluster ‘heterogeneous counties’ (SMR men: 0.73, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.88).

Conclusions The population which was quasi-randomly distributed to counties of differing socioeconomic status experienced different levels of mortality. It was highest in regions with the highest level of regional deprivation. Previous studies describing this positive relationship between mortality and regional deprivation could not differentiate between compositional and contextual effects. Thus, our findings indicate that in terms of mortality, regional deprivation does matter.

  • Mortality
  • Geography
  • Clusters

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.