Article Text

other Versions

PDF
To nudge or not to nudge: cancer screening programmes and the limits of libertarian paternalism
  1. Thomas Ploug1,
  2. Søren Holm2,3,
  3. John Brodersen4
  1. 1Centre for Applied Ethics and Philosophy of Science, Department of Communication, Aalborg University Copenhagen, Ballerup, Denmark
  2. 2Centre for Social Ethics and Policy, School of Law, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
  3. 3Center for Medical Ethics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
  4. 4The Research Unit and Section for General Practice, Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
  1. Correspondence to Dr Thomas Ploug, Centre for Applied Ethics and Philosophy of Science, Department of Communication, Aalborg University Copenhagen, Lautrupvang 2B, 2750 Ballerup, Denmark; ploug{at}hum.aau.dk

Abstract

‘Nudging—and the underlying idea ‘libertarian paternalism’—to an increasing degree influences policy thinking in the healthcare sector. This article discusses the influence exerted upon a woman's choice of participation in the Danish breast screening programme in light of ‘libertarian paternalism’. The basic tenet of ‘libertarian paternalism’ is outlined and the relationship between ‘libertarian paternalism’ and informed consent investigated. Key elements in the process of enrolling women into the Danish mammography screening programme are introduced. It is shown that for several reasons the influence exerted upon women's choices of participation cannot be justified within a welfare-enhancing libertarian paternalistic framework. The article suggests that screening programmes alternatively adopt a liberty-enhancing approach and considers the practical implications of this alternative.

  • Nudging
  • libertarian paternalism
  • informed consent
  • mass screening
  • breast neoplasms
  • ethics
  • public health policy
  • screening
  • general practice
  • preventive medicine
  • psychometrics
  • public health

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.