Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Adult mortality surveillance by routine health workers using a short verbal autopsy tool in rural north India
  1. Anand Krishnan1,
  2. Rakesh Kumar1,
  3. Baridalyne Nongkynrih1,
  4. Puneet Misra1,
  5. Rahul Srivastava1,
  6. Suresh K Kapoor2
  1. 1Centre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
  2. 2Department of Community Health, St Stephen's Hospital, New Delhi, India
  1. Correspondence to Dr Anand Krishnan, Comprehensive Rural Health Services Project, Civil Hospital Ballabgarh, Faridabad, Haryana 121004, India; kanandiyer{at}yahoo.com

Abstract

Background Most of the standard verbal autopsy tools are long and are used in a research setting. This study aims to compare a short verbal autopsy (VA) tool developed at Ballabgarh, India to be used by health workers for routine mortality surveillance with a standard tool.

Methods A short VA tool was developed which was used by health workers during their routine house visits while a standard International Network of Field Sites with continuous Demographic Evaluation (INDEPTH) VA tool was filled by trained research workers for all adult deaths that occurred in 2008. The cause-specific mortality fraction using two tools, validity of the Comprehensive Rural Health Services Project (CRHSP) VA tool with INDEPTH VA tool as reference and agreement between the two tools, was compared.

Results The cause-specific mortality fraction was 11.6% and 12% for ischaemic heart disease (IHD), 10.6% and 11.8% for chronic pulmonary obstructive disease (COPD), and 9.4% and 7.3% for tuberculosis, using the INDEPTH and CRHSP VA tool, respectively. 16% and 21% of the deaths could not be classified using the INDEPTH and CRHSP VA tool respectively. The sensitivity of the CRHSP VA tool was 78.5% for IHD, 80% for COPD, 58.3% for tuberculosis, 92.8% for malignant neoplasm and 97.2% for intentional self harm. The kappa between two tools for IHD, COPD, tuberculosis, malignant neoplasm and intentional self harm was 0.754, 0.711, 0.628, 0.876 and 0.892 respectively.

Conclusion The short VA tool had a good sensitivity and fair to excellent agreement with the standard tool in different age groups across the major causes of death. It can be used within the routine healthcare delivery framework and can fill the gap in mortality surveillance.

  • Verbal autopsy
  • health workers
  • agreement
  • cause-specific mortality fraction
  • health services research
  • mortality SI
  • vital statistics

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Funding This study was funded by the intramural research grant of the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Ethics approval Ethics approval was provided by the Institutional Ethics Committee, All India Institute of Medical Sciences.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.