In the 1970s Archie Cochrane noted that many healthcare procedures and forms of organisation lacked evidence of effectiveness and efficiency, and argued for improved methods of evaluation, moving from clinical opinion and observation to randomised controlled trials (RCT). His arguments gradually became accepted in medicine, but there has been considerable resistance among policymakers and researchers to their application to social and public health interventions. This essay argues that opposition to RCT in public health is often based on a false distinction between healthcare and community settings, and sometimes on a misunderstanding of the principles of RCT in health care. It suggests that just as in medicine, good intentions and received wisdom are not a sufficient basis for making public policy and allocating public funds for social or health improvement.
- Archie Cochrane
- comm interven trials
- evid based med SI
- lack of evidence
- objections to trials
- randomised controlled trials
- social and public health interventions
- social inequalities
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Funding This work is supported by the UK Medical Research Council, wbs U.1300.00.006.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; not externally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.