rss
J Epidemiol Community Health doi:10.1136/jech.2010.108852
  • Research report

Propensity score matching approach to test the association of income inequality and mortality in São Paulo, Brazil

  1. Sabina Léa Davidson Gotlieb1
  1. 1Departamento de Epidemiologia, Faculdade de Saúde Pública, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
  2. 2Department of Society, Human Development and Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts. USA
  1. Correspondence to Alexandre Dias Porto Chiavegatto Filho, Rua Santa Rosa Júnior, 123, apto 91B, 05579-010 Butantã, São Paulo - SP, Brazil; alexdiasporto{at}usp.br
  • Accepted 31 May 2010
  • Published Online First 5 October 2010

Abstract

Background Support for the adverse effect of high income inequality on population health has come from studies that focus on larger areas, such as the US states, while studies at smaller geographical areas (eg, neighbourhoods) have found mixed results.

Methods We used propensity score matching to examine the relationship between income inequality and mortality rates across 96 neighbourhoods (distritos) of the municipality of São Paulo, Brazil.

Results Prior to matching, higher income inequality distritos (Gini ≥0.25) had slightly lower overall mortality rates (2.23 per 10 000, 95% CI −23.92 to 19.46) compared to lower income inequality areas (Gini <0.25). After propensity score matching, higher inequality was associated with a statistically significant higher mortality rate (41.58 per 10 000, 95% CI 8.85 to 73.3).

Conclusion In São Paulo, the more egalitarian communities are among some of the poorest, with the worst health profiles. Propensity score matching was used to avoid inappropriate comparisons between the health status of unequal (but wealthy) neighbourhoods versus equal (but poor) neighbourhoods. Our methods suggest that, with proper accounting of heterogeneity between areas, income inequality is associated with worse population health in São Paulo.

Footnotes

  • Funding Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES).

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Free sample

This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of JECH.
View free sample issue >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Navigate This Article