Background Few studies address the profiles of antihypertensive compliance among ethnic Chinese. The levels of and factors associated with antihypertensive drug compliance among Chinese patients were evaluated in this study.
Methods All Chinese hypertensive patients who paid at least two consecutive visits in any government primary care clinics for antihypertensive drug refill in a large territory of Hong Kong from January 2004 to June 2007 were included. Medication possession ratio (MPR), defined as the ratio of total days of medication supplied (not including the last prescription) to total days in a period of time, was used a measure of drug compliance.
Results From 83 884 eligible patients, 71 685 (85.5%) had good compliance to antihypertensive drugs (MPR ≥80%). Binary logistic regression analysis was conducted, with good compliance as the outcome variable while controlling for potential confounders. Advanced age (adjusted ORs (aOR) 1.36–1.55, p<0.001), female gender (aOR for male patients 0.84, 95% CI 0.80 to 0.87, p<0.001), payment of fees (aOR 1.14, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.19, p<0.001), attendance in family medicine specialist clinic (aOR 1.52, 95% CI 1.40 to 1.66, p<0.001), follow-up visits (aOR 3.21, 95% CI 3.06 to 3.36, p<0.001) and use of drugs acting on the renin–angiotensin system (aOR 1.18, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.30, p=0.001) were positively associated with good compliance to drugs. Use of β-blockers was negatively associated with drug compliance (aOR 0.78, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.84, p<0.001).
Conclusions Physicians should practice caution when prescribing antihypertensive drugs to patients with these factors where closer monitoring of their compliance patterns is warranted.
- Antihypertensive drugs
- associated factors
- clinical pharmacology
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Data access: All authors had full access to all study data and can take responsibility for the integrity of data and the accuracy of data analysis. Data Sharing: Technical appendix, statistical code and dataset are available from the corresponding author at
Competing interests None.
Ethical approval This study was approved by the Survey and Behavioural Research Ethics Committee, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.