Background: The potential impact fraction is a measure of effect that calculates the proportional change in disease risk after a change in the exposure of a related risk factor. Potential impact fractions are increasingly used to calculate attributable fractions when lowest exposure is non-zero.
Methods: Risk factor exposure can be expressed as a categorical or a continuous variable. For a categorical risk factor a change in risk factor exposure can be expressed as a change in the proportion of the population in each category (“proportions shift”). For a continuous risk factor the change is expressed as a change in its parameters (“distribution shift”). A third method (“relative risk shift”), takes elements of both the categorical and the continuous approach. We compare the three calculation methods using hypothetical data on body mass index and an intervention that affects the obese category.
Results: The “proportion shift” calculation produces non-linear artifacts, and is best avoided. The “relative risk shift” and “distribution shift” calculation require the estmation of a relative risk function to describe excess risk, but perform much better.
Conclusion: The “proportion shift” calculation is best avoided. The “relative risk shift” and “distribution shift” calculation produce virtually the same results. For evaluating high risk strategies the “relative risk shift” calculation is the simplest and therefore preferred. The “distribution shift” is best suited for evaluating population strategies.