Article Text

other Versions

The effects on health of a publicly-funded domestic heating programme : a prospective controlled study
  1. Jeremy J Walker1,
  2. Richard J Mitchell2,
  3. Mark Petticrew3,
  4. Stephen D Platt1
  1. 1 University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom;
  2. 2 University of Glasgow, United Kingdom;
  3. 3 London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom
  1. E-mail: steve.platt{at}


Objectives: To assess the effect of a publicly-funded domestic heating programme on self-reported health.

Design: Prospective controlled study.

Setting: Scotland.

Participants: Heads of household (or partners) from 1,281 households receiving new central heating systems under a publicly-funded initiative, and from 1,084 comparison households not receiving new heating (total 2,365).

Main outcome measures: Self-reported diagnosis of asthma, bronchitis, eczema, nasal allergy, heart disease, circulatory problems or high blood pressure during the two-year study period; number of primary care encounters and hospital contacts in past year; SF-36 health survey scores.

Results: Usable data were obtained from 61.4% of 3,849 respondents originally recruited into the study. Central heating programme recipients reported higher scores on the SF-36 Physical Functioning scale (difference 2.51 units; 95% CI: 0.67 units to 4.37 units) and General Health scale (difference 2.57 units; 95% CI: 0.90 units to 4.34 units). Heating recipients were less likely to report having received a first diagnosis of heart disease (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.52 to 0.91) or high blood pressure (OR 0.77; 95% CI 0.61 to 0.97) during the study period, but the groups did not differ significantly in use of primary care or hospital services. Recipients were also more likely to report a first diagnosis of nasal allergy (OR 1.52; 95% CI 1.05 to 2.20).

Conclusions: Provision of central heating was associated with significant positive effects on general health and physical functioning; however, effect sizes were small. Evidence of a reduced risk of first diagnosis with heart disease or high blood pressure must be interpreted with caution, due to the self-reported nature of the outcomes, the limited time period covered by the study and the failure to detect any difference in health service use.

Statistics from


    Request permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.