Article Text

other Versions

PDF

Characterisation of smoking behaviour across the life course and its impact on decline in lung function and all-cause mortality: evidence from a British birth cohort
  1. Suzanne Clennell1,
  2. Diana L Kuh2,
  3. Jack Guralnick3,
  4. Kushang Patel3,
  5. Gita D Mishra2
  1. 1 Medical Research Council National Survey of Health and Developement, United Kingdom;
  2. 2 Medical Research Council National Survey of Health and Development, United Kingdom;
  3. 3 National Institute on Aging, United States
  1. E-mail: g.mishra{at}nshd.mrc.ac.uk

Abstract

Objectives To describe smoking trajectories from early adolescence into mid-life, and to examine the effects of these trajectories on health and all-cause mortality. Design A nationally representative birth cohort study. Setting England, Scotland, Wales. Study members 3387 men and women followed up since their birth in 1946. Main outcome measure All-cause mortality by age 60 years, rate of decline in FEV1.

Results Eighteen percent of the sample were categorised as lifelong smokers (smokers at all 6 waves at ages 20, 25, 31, 36, 43, 53 years), of whom 90% had begun smoking by age 18. By age 60, 10% of all lifelong smokers had died. They had a threefold increase in mortality rate compared with never smokers (hazard ratio=3.2, 95%confidence interval:2.1,4.8). For predominantly smokers (smokers for at least four of the six data collections) mortality rate remained higher than never smokers (HR=1.6, 95%CI:1.0,2.5). Predominantly non-smokers did not differ from those who never smoked (HR=1.3, 95%CI:0.9,2.0). Using the most recent smoking status available, current smokers had more than doubled risk of mortality compared with never smokers (HR=2.4, 95%CI:1.6,3.5). Lifelong smokers and predominantly smokers had greater rate of decline in lung function than never-smokers (regression coefficients=-18mL/year, 95%CI:-22,-13; -6, 95%CI: -10.3, -1.7, respectively). For current smokers the decline was 8.4 ml/year (95% CI: -12.0,-5.0) faster than never smokers.

Conclusions: The strength and differentiation of adverse effects identified by using simplified smoking behaviours has highlighted the advantages of obtaining further information on lifelong smoking behaviour from former smokers, rather than just current smoking status.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

    Request permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Linked Articles

    • In this issue
      Mauricio L Barreto