Article Text

PDF
Initial non-participation and loss to follow-up in a Danish youth cohort: implications for relative risk estimates
  1. Trine N Winding1,
  2. Johan H Andersen1,
  3. Merete Labriola1,2,
  4. Ellen A Nohr3,4
  1. 1Department of Occupational Medicine, Danish Ramazzini Centre, Regional Hospital Herning, Herning, Denmark
  2. 2Department of Clinical Social Medicine, Public Health and Quality Management, Central Denmark Region and Section of Clinical Social Med, and Rehabilitation, School of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
  3. 3Research Unit of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Institute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
  4. 4Department of Public Health, Section for Epidemiology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
  1. Correspondence to Trine Nøhr Winding, Department of Occupational Medicine, Danish Ramazzini Centre, Regional Hospital Herning, Gl. Landevej 61, Herning 7400, Denmark; trinwind{at}rm.dk

Abstract

Background Initial non-participation and loss to follow-up in the Danish youth cohort Vestliv could introduce selection bias of the measured risk estimates.

Objective To investigate the impact of initial non-participation and loss to follow-up on the validity of descriptive measures and selected estimates of relative risk.

Methods Of the 3681 young people defining the source population, 83% answered a questionnaire at baseline in 2004. At follow-up waves in 2007 and 2010, the response rates were 71% and 64%, respectively. Relative ORs (RORs) were used to examine the impact of initial non-participation and loss to follow-up on the association between socioeconomic or personal risk factors at age 14/15 and educational attainment at age 20/21. RORs were calculated as OR (baseline population)/OR (source population) or OR (follow-up population)/OR (baseline population).

Results The participants had slightly better school abilities and came more often from homes with two adults, higher income or higher educational level. These differences increased at subsequent follow-ups. The effect of initial non-participation on the ORs was modest with most RORs being close to one. Loss to follow-up led to larger variations in the RORs ranging from 0.77 to 1.62 although for most estimates, the bias was minor. None of the measured RORs were statistically different from one indicating no significant bias.

Conclusions Although certain characteristics were related to those who initially chose to participate and especially to those who participated at follow-ups, it did not have any large influence on the relative risk estimates measured in the study.

  • Cohort studies
  • EPIDEMIOLOGY
  • ADOLESCENTS CG

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.