Article Text

PDF
Effect of street connectivity and density on adult BMI: results from the Twin Cities Walking Study
  1. Kelsey N McDonald1,
  2. J Michael Oakes1,
  3. Ann Forsyth2
  1. 1University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, School of Public Health, Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
  2. 2Department of City and Regional Planning, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
  1. Correspondence to J Michael Oakes, University of Minnesota, School of Public Health, Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, West Bank Office Building, 1300 S. Second St., Suite 300, Minneapolis, MN 55454-1015, USA; oakes007{at}umn.edu

Abstract

Background The prevalence of overweight and obesity in the US population has risen dramatically in recent years. To try to explain this, some studies have examined the association between the built environment and obesity (measured using the body mass index (BMI)). Most of these studies have not sought to identify causal effects, but rather correlations.

Methods Data from the Twin Cities Walking Study were used to examine the effect of population density and block size on BMI. Although the Twin Cities Walking Study is a cross-sectional observational study, the matched-sampling design is novel in that it maximises environmental variance while minimising person variance to enhance exchangeability of subjects and more closely mimic an experimental study.

Results Contrary to expectations, the hypothesised most walkable neighbourhood (high density, small block stratum) had the greatest mean and median BMI. After adjusting for demographic covariates, physical activity and clustering due to neighbourhood, no conclusive effect of population density by block size on BMI was found (β=−1.024, 95% CI −2.408 to 0.359).

Conclusion There is no evidence of an effect of population density by block size on BMI.

  • Built environment
  • neighbourhood effects
  • obesity
  • walkability
  • matched-sample
  • body mass index
  • obesity EPI
  • study design
  • urban health

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Funding This study was supported by a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation through the Active Living Research Program.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Ethics approval This study was conducted with the approval of the University of Minnesota, Institutional Review Board.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.