Article Text

PDF
Evaluating the impact of non-response bias in the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS)
  1. Karen L Schneider1,
  2. Melissa A Clark2,
  3. William Rakowski2,
  4. Kate L Lapane3
  1. 1John Snow, Inc, Boston, Massachussets, USA
  2. 2Department of Community Health, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
  3. 3Department of Epidemiology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
  1. Correspondence to Karen L Schneider, John Snow, Inc. (JSI), 44 Farnsworth Street, Boston, Massachusetts USA; kschneider{at}jsi.com

Abstract

Background Response rates of national health surveys are decreasing, which potentially can bias obtained prevalence estimates. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the extent to which non-response impacts the representativeness of the 2000 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) sample compared to the 2000 Decennial Census.

Methods The 2000 BRFSS had a median response rate of 48%, while the 2000 Decennial Census had a response rate of 67%. Representativeness of the BRFSS sample was evaluated on gender, race, ethnicity, age, household income and marital status. Prevalence of each factor in the BRFSS was compared to the prevalence found in the US Census on both the state and county levels. Prevalence differences between the BRFSS and Census were calculated and their association with response rates was evaluated using robust OLS regression and polytomous logistic regression. The relationship between prevalence differences and other survey design elements, such as data collection procedure and sampling fraction, was also explored.

Results The BRFSS prevalence estimates diverged from the Census estimates on several sociodemographic factors even after adjustment for non-response/non-coverage. This was found on both the state and county levels; however, smaller absolute differences between the BRFSS and Census prevalence estimates were found for factors included in the non-response/non-coverage adjustment weight. Lower response rates (<40%) were associated with the under-representation of racial/ethnic minorities, women and younger individuals in the BRFSS survey.

Conclusion Future research should examine alternative approaches to increase response rate (eg, mixed mode) and to adjust for non-response (eg, multiple imputation).

  • Health surveys
  • behavioural risk factor surveillance system
  • surveillance SI
  • surveys me

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.