Article Text

PDF
Mechanistic causality and counterfactual-manipulative causality: recent insights from philosophy of science
  1. Raffaella Campaner
  1. Correspondence to Dr Raffaella Campaner, Department of Philosophy, University of Bologna, Via Zamboni 38, 40126 Bologna, Italy; raffaella.campaner{at}unibo.it

Abstract

Current epidemiological and statistical theory about research methods and how to elicit causation from epidemiological studies is strongly influenced by counterfactual-manipulative thinking. However, thinking about how disease states develop is rooted in mechanistic ‘webs of causes’. After a tremendous growth of research in molecular biology, biochemistry and genetics, attention has increasingly been paid to environmental and socioeconomic factors as determinants of diseases. This led to conceiving of most pathologies as caused by multilevel mechanical systems. The nature of ‘mechanisms’ has been the subject of extensive philosophical reflection over the past couple of decades. The present paper will first present some of today's philosophical insights in what are called biologic or other ‘mechanisms’ and thereafter show how these concepts can be linked to counterfactual-manipulative views.

  • Mechanisms
  • interventionist-counterfactuals
  • explanation
  • methodology ME
  • multicausation

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.