rss
J Epidemiol Community Health 64:243-251 doi:10.1136/jech.2008.083535
  • Research report

International migration and adverse birth outcomes: role of ethnicity, region of origin and destination

Table 5

OR (and 95% CI)* for LBW for migrant women compared with European-born and US-born women, and for various world regions according to their place of destination (Europe vs USA)

Migrant group Infants born in Europe Infants born in USA Infants born take over in Europe take over versus in USA†
OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI)
Native-born women 1.00 1.00 0.61 (0.47 to 0.79)
Migrants from
 Western Europe and north America 0.91 (0.77 to 1.07)
 East Europe 0.99 (0.79 to 1.25)
 North Africa and Middle East 0.78 (0.60 to 1.01)
 Sub-Saharan Africa 1.75 (1.44 to 2.12) 0.75 (0.55 to 1.02) 1.42 (0.95 to 2.14)
 South-central Asia 1.84 (1.54 to 2.20) 1.33 (1.01 to 1.77) 0.84 (0.57 to 1.23)
 East and south-east Asia 1.20 (0.72 to 2.02) 0.89 (0.73 to 1.09) 0.82 (0.46 to 1.46)
 Latin America and Caribbean 1.46 (1.17 to 1.83) 0.72 (0.62 to 0.82) 1.24 (0.90 to 1.72)
  • LBW, low birth weight; OR, odds ratio.

  • * Obtained with a three-level model including random effects (subgroup and studies) and fixed effects (migrant status, maternal region of origin, place of destination, maternal region of origin × place of destination and infant's year of birth).

  • Infants born in the USA are the reference group.

This Article

Free sample

This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of JECH.
View free sample issue >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.