rss
J Epidemiol Community Health 2010;64:10-15 doi:10.1136/jech.2008.086793
  • Evidence-based public health, policy and practice

A community-based targeting approach to exempt the worst-off from user fees in Burkina Faso

  1. V Ridde1,2,
  2. M Yaogo3,4,
  3. Y Kafando5,
  4. O Sanfo6,
  5. N Coulibaly6,
  6. P A Nitiema6,
  7. A Bicaba5
  1. 1
    Research Centre of the University of Montreal Hospital Centre (CRCHUM), Canada
  2. 2
    Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Montréal, Canada
  3. 3
    Groupe de recherche, d’Expertise et de Formation en Santé pour le développement (GREFSaD), Burkina Faso
  4. 4
    Université Catholique de l’Afrique de l’Ouest-Unité Universitaire de Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso
  5. 5
    Société d’étude et de recherche en santé publique (SERSAP), Burkina Faso
  6. 6
    Ministère de la santé, Burkina Faso
  1. Correspondence to Dr V Ridde, CRCHUM, International Health Unit, 3875 rue Saint-Urbain, Montréal, Québec, CANADA (H2W 1V1); valery.ridde{at}umontreal.ca
  • Accepted 31 July 2009
  • Published Online First 19 August 2009

Abstract

Background: To contend with the risk of exclusion created by user fees, those implementing the Bamako Initiative (BI) were asked to organise exemption schemes for the indigent. But those exemption schemes were never put in place in Africa due to difficulties identifying the indigent. An action research was implemented to test the hypothesis that a community-based process for selecting beneficiaries of user-fee exemptions in an African environment of BI organisation is feasible.

Methods: This study was carried out in 10 primary health centres (CSPS) in Burkina Faso. Village selection committees (VSC) made lists of those worst-off, and the lists were validated by village chiefs, mayors, and health committees (COGES). A process evaluation was implemented using documentation analysis, accounting calculation, focus groups and in-depth interviews.

Results: The 124 VSCs selected 566 persons. The 10 COGESs retained 269 persons (48%), ie 2.81 per 1000 inhabitants. Except for one CSPS, the annual profits from the user fee schemes could support on average six times more indigents than the mean number selected by the VSCs.

Conclusions: In the rural African context, villagers are capable of selecting those who should be exempted from user fees according to their own perspective. Thanks to the BI, health centres have a certain financial capacity to take care of the indigent. In a community-based targeting approach using endogenous resources generated from BI profits, local perceptions of the health centres’ financial viability, coupled with the hierarchical social context, led to a very restrictive selection of candidates for exemption.

Footnotes

  • Funding This action research was made possible through funding from the International Development Research Centre (IDRC) in Canada. Valéry Ridde currently holds a research fellowship from the Fonds de Recherche en Santé du Québec (FRSQ).

  • Competing interests None.

  • Ethics approval Canada and Burkina Faso ethics committees.

  • Provenance and Peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Register for free content


Free trial
Individuals may register for a free 60 day online trial to all content.

Free archive
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they ar

Latest infectious diseases and epidemilogy jobs

Ophthalmology Jobs