Article Text

PDF
Does the school fruit and vegetable scheme improve children’s diet? A non-randomised controlled trial
  1. J K Ransley1,
  2. D C Greenwood2,
  3. J E Cade1,
  4. S Blenkinsop3,
  5. I Schagen3,
  6. D Teeman3,
  7. E Scott3,
  8. G White3,
  9. S Schagen3
  1. 1Nutritional Epidemiology Group, Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Leeds, 30–32 Hyde Terrace, Leeds LS2 9LN, United Kingdom
  2. 2Biostatistics Unit, Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Leeds
  3. 3National Foundation for Educational Research, The Mere, Upton Park, Slough, Berks SL1 2DQ, United Kingdom
  1. Correspondence to:
 J K Ransley
 Nutritional Epidemiology Group, Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Leeds, 30–32 Hyde Terrace, Leeds LS2 9LN, United Kingdom; j.k.ransley{at}leeds.ac.uk

Abstract

Objective: Evaluation of the impact on diet of the school fruit and vegetable scheme (SFVS).

Design: Non-randomised controlled trial.

Setting: Infant and primary schools in the north of England.

Participants: 3703 children aged four to six years (reception, year 1, and year 2).

Intervention: One portion of fruit or vegetable provided per child on each school day between February and December 2004.

Main outcome measures: Fruit and vegetables consumed and intake of nutrients.

Results: The SFVS was associated with an increase in fruit intake across reception and year 1 pupils of 0.4 portions (95% confidence interval, 0.2 to 0.5) and 0.6 portions (0.4 to 0.9), respectively, at three months, which fell to 0.2 (0.1 to 0.4) and 0.3 (0.1 to 0.6) at seven months. In year 2 it was associated with an increase of 0.5 portions (0.2 to 0.7) of fruit at three months, which fell to baseline values at seven months when these children were no longer eligible for the scheme. Overall, at seven months there were no changes in vegetable consumption, no associations between the SFVS and energy, fat, or salt intake, and small changes in carotene and vitamin C intake.

Conclusions: The SFVS promoted an increase in fruit intake after three months. At seven months the effect remained significant but reduced, and it returned to baseline in year 2 when pupils were no longer part of the scheme. There was a small impact on the intake of some nutrients across the children surveyed.

  • CADET, child and diet evaluation tool
  • EAL, English as an additional language
  • SEN, special educational needs
  • SFVS, school fruit and vegetable scheme
  • school
  • children
  • diet
  • fruit
  • vegetables

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Funding: Big Lottery Fund (BLF). Independence from funder (BLF): All authors have acted independently of the body funding this research.

    Competing interests: None.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles

  • In this issue
    Carlos Alvarez-Dardet John R Ashton